9217

Thank you so much!

9217

For everyone that takes issue with Jung in this post:

Jung is one very small part of a very large body of research here. Please read all of the research to understand the scope of this. Even if you totally disgaree with me mentioning him, he is one very small part of a huge amount of research that needs further investigation. None of my posts before this one mentioned Jung. So I am hardly on a warpath against him.

Please research this yourself, it's important.

Jem777

For all you Jungians out there I have a few words. Yes he did appear as if he was differentiating himself from Freud but was he? Look a little deeper.

Dr. Carl Jung was actually a double agent working for the OSS (CIA) Dulles. He would get the wealthy (almost always female) to tell him their strories through Analysis and then feed that info to Dulles if the CIA.

His history is very well hidden. Not saying he is the monster Freud was but their is a sanitized version of him for a reason. I knew someone who was a personal confidant and can prove it.

What @9217 wrote is correct.

9217

Honestly I was a fan of Jung before researching this. But his connection to Tavistock, which is publicly available information, changed my mind. I still don't feel he was the monster that Freud was - but this entire area needs more research.

Jem777

Yes I agree. When you realize what Tavistock does and is then you begin to understand what we have been allowed to know of Jung is missing something. How can Tavistock have a statue if that monster Freud still today when Jung was around much longer and allegedly completely disagreed with his teaching which were being implemented at Tavistock.

cantsleepawink

Because Jung wasn't all about sex. Freud was a pervert. That's the hidden bit. Jung pissed off because he couldn't deal with Freud and his inner circle any longer. Jung was also heterosexual...unlike Freud.

cantsleepawink

The Tavistock and Portsman Foundation Trust https://tavistockandportman.nhs.uk/about-us/who-we-are/history/

Among the most influential figures in the history of the Tavistock Clinic was Dr Wilfred Bion. With fellow army psychiatrist and psychoanalyst Dr John Rickman, Bion pioneered a therapeutic community for soldiers, and a method of group selection of officers which became the War Office Selection Board.

The legacy of Wilfred Bion : http://www.psychoanalysis-and-therapy.com/human_nature/glover/chap4.html

This chapter will look at Bion's development of Freud and Klein's metapsychology and the impact of his ideas on current aesthetic debate, largely developed through the work of Donald Meltzer.

9217

Very nice! I definitely knew as I wrote this that I would inevitably miss important pieces like this. It's just too huge of an area for one person to catalogue it all.

cantsleepawink

Very recently there was a UK television programme called "Make or Break" which included an Esalen sex therapist :

Make or Break: Fans in shock over sex therapist Louise Mazanti and her X-Rated comments about Elle and Jess

MAKE or Break viewers were left in shock by the new arrival on the Channel 5 dating programme.

Louise Mazanti / Esalen : https://www.esalen.org/person/louise-mazanti

Louise Mazanti works in private practice as a psychotherapist specializing in sex and intimacy issues using Psychosexual SomaticsĀ®. She is also an international teacher together with her husband, Mike Lousada. Danish-born, Louise holds degrees in art and design theory and Psychosynthesis Counseling.

9217

Esalen, Rebillot's European groups, the centers gathering campuses, and the Harbin tied groups like HAI Global, are huge into sex ed. The lesser known groups also advocate child sex ed at 4 yrs old, and I did connect HAI to a pedophile.

Shillaxe

Harbin burned down, sadly destroying evidence AND Highway 1 between Carmel & Cayucus is closed for a year because of a slide, Esalen is in between.Karma 😈

9217

Yeah and Esalen shut down after the mudslides there too. Convenient timing.

cantsleepawink

Sad to see Carl Jung's name tainted in this article here because of his early association with Freud. They were two very different psychoanalysts. Jung split from Freud because of Freud's obsession with sex and insistence with filtering all human experience through that lens. He developed a more spiritual approach to psychology as well as the concepts of the collective unconscious distinguishing it from the personal unconscious of Freudian psychoanalysis. He argued that the collective unconscious had profound influence on the lives of individuals, who lived out its symbols and clothed them in meaning through their experiences.. There is a vast chasm between Freudian and Jungian psychotherapists and psychoanalysts which lasts to this day.

Here is a link with a very simple summary about the two men https://www.simplypsychology.org/psychodynamic.html

Jung's close collaboration with Freud lasted until 1913. Jung had become increasingly critical of Freud's exclusively sexual definition of libido and incest. The publication of Jung's Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido (known in English as The Psychology of the Unconscious) led to a final break.


From Wikipedia :

Critics of the collective unconscious concept

They mean Freudians

have called it unscientific and fatalistic, or otherwise very difficult to test scientifically (due to the mythical aspect of the collective unconscious) for those faith-based scientists.[2] Proponents suggest that it is borne out by findings of psychology, neuroscience, and anthropology.

Meaning: can no longer hide the fact that neuroscience and other scientific disciplines are corroborating Jung's theories.

The world of psychology is still largely dominated by Freudian disciples. Please don't get the two men and their work confused. It would be a huge disservice to Jung.

9217

I was a fan of Jung before I researched this. I don't think he was the monster Freud was, but his connections to Tavistock and Esalen do need to be looked into.

I am aware of the difference between Jung and Freud -- I have always liked Jung. However, Jung also describes having had an alter personality as a child, and described his mother similarly. So I cannot ignore these types of things while researching this area. I think I wrote in the article that he would be as much a victim as perpetrator, if the indications from childhood are correct.

eg: "Jung was a solitary and introverted child. From childhood, he believed that, like his mother,[11] he had two personalities—a modern Swiss citizen and a personality more suited to the 18th century.[12] "Personality Number 1", as he termed it, was a typical schoolboy living in the era of the time. "Personality Number 2" was a dignified, authoritative and influential man from the past."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Jung

cantsleepawink

You will realize from my posts that I am a big fan of Jung. I regard him as one of the great minds of the 20th Century. He was also deeply spiritual. He was not connected to Esalen. Esalen was founded in 1962. They have taken some of his teachings because he was so influential and his concepts extremely powerful in terms of the human psyche. Freud on the other hand seems to have been a pervert and some of that has been hidden in the writing of his history. His family line is still influential in London - with Tavistock and other psychological institutions. Most psychology textbooks are heavily Freudian. Jung was too spiritual and somewhat more complex for materialists. However as we as a society become more complex we can see Jung's influence in companies like Disney and Marvel comics, for example, who use his ideas on archetypes to create characters that are deeply influential to young people. And we see some of these ideas played out ever more crudely in pop culture.

9217

I mostly agree with everything you've said here. I think it is unwise to allow our personal respect for anyone to negate research around them.

Seriously. This entire series of posts mentioned Jung in brief in one part of a much longer investigation into a related topic, but is not and was not intended to unfairly mar Jung. And since he is listed in association with Tavistock directly, it is not unfair to think that he warrants further research.

Tavistock's wiki page mentions Jung's association with Tavi:

"Many well-known psychologists and psychiatrists have passed through the Tavistock Institute over the years, and it became known as the focal point in Britain for psychoanalysis and the psychodynamic theories of Sigmund Freud and his followers. Other names associated with the Tavistock are Melanie Klein, Carl Gustav Jung, J. A. Hadfield, Beckett, Charles Rycroft, Wilfred Bion, and R. D. Laing."

Here's what I wrote about him:

"Before stumbling upon this area of research, I had believed Jung to have been a genuinely positive influence in developing therapuetic methods. After researching his connections to Tavistock, and Esalen, it is clear to me that despite my previous assumptions, Jung was most likely involved in similar studies of trauma based mind control. His life is haunting when viewed from this perspective. He acknowledged that in childhood he perceived himself and his mother to have had alternate personalities."

"His interest in primitive cultures and ritual is also significant in understanding Esalen and associated group's near-obsession with these same cultures.Jung's artistic expression in works like the Red Book might be viewed as much as the inner work of a DID sufferer, as that of a person involved with the research and perpetuation of abuses by military intelligence groups."

I feel this was at once truthful and sympathetic to Jung. No where did I call him a monster.

This link is more food for thought on Jung's behaviour; I am not intending to smear OR support him. Only point out that this is all worth more research, that is all.

I would ask you to please read the entire articles I posted, which are much larger in scope than an argument around Jung, and I think are very important in regards to ritual abuse.

cantsleepawink

Sure. I'm sure Jung can handle the scrutiny :-)

Now let's get down to business:

After researching his connections to Tavistock, and Esalen, it is clear to me that despite my previous assumptions, Jung was most likely involved in similar studies of trauma based mind control.

You need to back up that statement. Where's the evidence to qualify that statement?

9217

Also, you are apparently ignoring the fact that Jung slept with a mentally ill patient. When he dumped her, she stabbed him. This was the catalyst for the Red Book.

Are you going to tell me that he was a cool guy so him sleeping with a patient is ok? I do not go for covering up the reality of abuse. Ever.

9217

Among many other issues, Carl Jung's involvement with John Weir Perry, who studied directly with him.

Perry set up Diabasis House in connection with Esalen, which was closely modeled on RD Laing's similar exp in london.

Weir Perry is deeply involved with problematic groups. Which I wrote about here -

https://steemit.com/news/@whitedeer9217/ra-anon-esalen-part-3

Not intending to mar. I just want people to look into this. I am not here to argue about the good or bad of Jung's personality or his work individually. I am here to try to explain how ritual abuse is tied to "hippy" retreat centers that had military intelligence ties, including to the Finders.

10314366?

i was told by my own "RA Anon" that it's all very, very compartmentalized and often the people involved don't know the full story or the extent of what they're working on. i personally believe Jung probably didn't know the exact significance of his work for them if he was involved.

angry_mob

yeah i agree with you on this. we have to remember that it's always a smaller handful of people that are actually aware of & involved with issues like trafficking and SRA.

although there probably does exist various connections that the writer of the article lays out, i just don't jive with his perspective and also the conclusions that he jumps to. i'm actually quite interested in consciousness studies myself, at least at one point i was doing some reading about that.

10320379?

they co-opt everything real and valuable and turn it into shit. they're like reverse alchemists. (within my spiritual frame of reference they literally are reverse alchemists; turning value into shit, manifestation into void, life into death, etc)

it would be painful and baffling if literally every person who ever wondered about higher truths or spiritual growth was secretly in on it for the MK Ultra lulz, so i just can't believe that's the case. Jung had some really valuable ideas and i genuinely don't think he was "in on it."

cantsleepawink

I'm sure that's true too.

darkknight111

This pisses me off. Just about every fan of the videogame series "Persona" are gonna be pissed about this tainting of Jung's name, for Jungian Psychology is the center piece of the entire series.

9217

Pointing out the truth factually is not tainting his name. If he did shameful things, he tainted it all by himself.

darkknight111

Question is "Did he do something, or were his ideas co-opted"? That I don't know.

Jungian Psychology has potential to be used both for great good or for great evil.

I hope that the truth is that he was "Co-opted" rather than actively corrupt.

9217

If you think my research is only about Jung, you've missed the entire point.

darkknight111

I'm just saying my personal feelings. My reasons for being upset.

The other stuff in there is actually quite interesting and worth further inquiry.

Happy hunting.

cantsleepawink

I'm not into videogames myself so I just had a quick look and I'm quite impressed with the deep use of Jungian psychology. Do you think something like that could be used to mess with people's heads and 're-program them', so to speak?

darkknight111

Depends on context and how its used. Many things can be used for both good and evil, except the things that are inherently evil.

A "shadow" self isn't nessecarily evil as it represents what exists in a person's subconsious. The road to self improvement requires a person to understand and accept their shadow. Or at least that's how it works for a decent person. In an evil person, a shadow is what they subconsciously hide not from themselves, but what they actively hide from others to keep appearances.

Persona is thoroughly about the POSITIVE side of Jungian Psychology in its "Social Link" quests, namely the part about self improvement, facing the deeper truths of yourself and the world.

Persona 5 is actually a big time "Red Pill Game" for those who understand its deeper truths.

The final arc is a massive allegory for the Deep State and its dirty tactics. Due to his MO, the main villain is an allegory to Hillary Clinton. One of the game's party members is an allegory for 4chan possibly /pol due to her weaponized autism (she is believed to have Aspergers).

cantsleepawink

As someone steeped in Jungian psychology I certainly don't see a 'shadow self' as evil. Video games can be used for good or bad or neither. As I have not played Persona I just wondered what you thought of it. Thanks for the feedback and introducing me to it.

darkknight111

The Persona series (3 and beyond) are widely considered gaming masterpieces, and thus have my highest recommendation.

Persona 5 (the red pill game) is already being considered one of the greatest RPGs of all time despite only being about 4.5 months old (US, 11 months old in Japan). Easily the best game in the series.

One of 5's party members requires a basic understanding of Jungian psychology to understand half of what he's talking about.

cantsleepawink

A videogame ? What? Lol. I'm going to check it out.

madhatter67

I'm with you on that....Jung provided a very useful framework for understanding this shit show we are in....and rejected the purely materialistic approach to the mind that got us here in the first place....

That said his ideas also do seem to have been taken up by the shady mind controlly end of new age which brought us pizzagate

cantsleepawink

That said his ideas also do seem to have been taken up by the shady mind controlly end of new age which brought us pizzagate

That's because they co-opt everything and use all human knowledge to turn it against the masses.

9217

I just hope this gives people an idea of where to start looking, etc, rather than fill in every gap and answer every question in and of itself.

Beginning of post:

"this anonymous poster, who stated that a fundamental purpose of Esalen and the work of Carl Jung and Joseph Campbell there was to "create Messiahs" - this is another way of phrasing what I called in previous posts "controlling the controllers." It can be seen in the creation of cult leaders, as much as in political puppets like Macron. This reference to 'creating messiahs' is also a way of referencing the creation of multiple personality disorder in cultural and political leaders (or cult leaders).

As the anonymous poster observes, major figures in psychoanalysis like Carl Jung and Joseph Campbell were involved with Esalen. Whereas my previous posts on Esalen described its association with the CIA, OSS and Tavistock, this final section will examine and attempt to provide context for shamanistic style ritual abuse which may take place at Esalen and associated centers.

In doing so, we see that figures like Paul Rebillot and Joh Weir Perry bridge Esalen, the Human Potential Movement and the work Campbell and Jung. Rebillot's focus on ritual and association with Findhorn as well as the works of Joseph Campbell inform an understanding on the focus at Esalen on shamanic cultures and rituals, as does Weir Perry's work and related groups."

9217

My hope here is not to map out every connection to Esalen or to completely define ritual abuse, but to provide a degree of context which might aid further research into both ritual abuse and the aforementioned groups. If my hypothesis about the reality of campuses like Esalen is correct, then there are others who know that this is the case, and can continue research on the matter.

9217

"Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud are important in discussions of Esalen, because both were associated with Tavistock, which as we have seen, greatly influenced the founding of Esalen. Tavistock was also associated with John Rawlings-Rees, and received a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation."

Read the rest here .

cantsleepawink

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosynthesis

Freud, however, was opposed to what he saw as the directive element in Jung's approach to psychosynthesis,[8]

and

Psychosynthesis is therefore one of the earliest forerunners of both humanistic psychology and transpersonal psychology, even preceding Jung's break with Freud by several years.

Sadly, the article brushes over the reasons for Jung's break with Freud.

9217

Psychosynethesis's founder was a huge fan of Alice Bailely, who brought us the UN's Lucis Trust. Psychosynthesis ties in to Findhorn, the work of the Huxleys, and more.

Am not arguing Freud vs Jung or against Jung, I am calling for more research because of the connection to ritual abuse here, as well as military intel agencies - all centered at Esalen and similar campuses like Findhorn.