A federal judge ordered the FBI on Thursday to disclose more details about how it handled its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s secret email account.
U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg said court papers describing the grand jury subpoenas the FBI obtained to compel information from Mrs. Clinton’s internet service providers can be made public.
In doing so, he overruled objections by the Trump administration that had insisted making the information public would violate grand jury secrecy rules.
“After reviewing the document in camera, the court concludes that it largely rehashes information already made public, thus obviating any need for secrecy,” the judge said.
Two groups, Judicial Watch and Cause of Action Institute, have been prodding the government for more information about the Clinton emails, and they cheered the judge’s ruling as a victory for transparency.
“This order makes public details submitted by the government about the FBI’s efforts to recover then-Secretary Clinton’s unlawfully removed emails. Americans deserve to know the full scope of that investigation,” said COA President John J. Vecchione.
Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said he didn’t understand why the Trump administration was still backing the Obama administration’s fight against transparency in this case.
“President Trump ought to be outraged his appointees are protecting Hillary Clinton,” Mr. Fitton said. “The State Department should initiate action with the Justice Department — and both agencies should finally take the necessary steps to recover all the government emails Hillary Clinton unlawfully removed.”
The case stems from questions about Mrs. Clinton’s secret server and the trove of emails she belatedly turned over.
The former secretary of state said she included all of her work-related emails in what she returned to the department, then wiped the server — which she had kept at her home in New York — clean.
But the FBI managed to obtain some emails that were clearly work-related, but which the former senator and first lady didn’t turn over, raising questions about what else may be out there.
Mrs. Clinton’s critics have said the FBI needs to make a more robust effort to try to recover those messages.
The FBI this week also refused an open-records request from a lawyer seeking the bureau’s file on its investigation into Mrs. Clinton. The FBI said there was too little public interest in the case to outweigh Mrs. Clinton’s privacy interests.
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/31/judge-fbi-must-disclose-hillary-clinton-email-prob/
▼ Lunger
Apparently, the only work they did was to draft the exoneration letter.
▼ ThePuppetShow
That's already coming back to haunt them too. More red pills are coming.
▼ carmencita
“President Trump ought to be outraged his appointees are protecting Hillary Clinton,” Mr. Fitton said. “The State Department should initiate action with the Justice Department — and both agencies should finally take the necessary steps to recover all the government emails Hillary Clinton unlawfully removed.” First of all McCabe needs to go. What is the hold up on that. We will keep getting Standoffs until serious steps are taken. Kudos to this Judge and the two groups, especially Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch.
▼ EricKaliberhall
It is time for some high-level arrests, the swamp is enormous.
▼ Gorillion
I can see the rationale of the FBI snake refusing to comply until legally compelled to do so. They want a nice fat paper-trail showing they had no choice in the matter and performed due diligence for their masters to the extent of their abilites, so Hillary etc has no reason to call a suicide hit on them for suspected complicity with investigative forces.
When a serious scandal like this moves up a pay grade, the lower level minions can breath a sign of relief.
▼ izze
this judge is really sticking his neck out there. And honestly i am surprised anyone in this type of position is standing up to the FBI's decision. Good on him, U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg!
▼ Gbuggers
Amen...
▼ 2impendingdoom
yes, I agree with what you are saying but imagine being the judge who gives the FBI precedence for ignoring evidence, you basically are admitting that the federal justice system is fraud... it never should have got to this point.
▼ DeathTooMasons
Most of it will be redacted and blacked out.
▼ ThePuppetShow
I wouldn't be shocked.
▼ RoBatten
The swamp is still neck-deep . . .
▼ ThePuppetShow
Yeah.. it's more like a polluted ocean.