First post... I don't know law enforcement. This seems weird to me.
The felonies appear to be about a single video that he possessed and offered to someone.
The warrant was about photos he downloaded but they are not part of the charges.
So the police knew he had visited a site perhaps set up by them or taken over by them or how would they know he visited?
What I'm wondering is how easy would it be to set someone up. Can photos be hidden on a home page so visiting the page automatically downloads the child porn onto your temp file. Now the police can pick and choose who they want to harass with warrants. In this case they might be trying to destroy the mayor or his son or get a two-fer.
This guy had a single video that offended the officers. Not an overflowing database. He might have many many photos but not offending enough to charge him with. Don't the cops try to throw the book at you? Do they hold back charges and add them in later even if the photos were found on his PC at the same time as the video?
I'm not commenting on this guy's guilt or innocence, I'm thinking of you researchers who are going onto all kinds of crazy sites I won't go. Isn't every page you visit a download? They are all preserved on a temp file, right?
I wish I knew more so I knew how to think about it. This story is not like others I've cheered for. People had tons of shit. The story doesn't make me feel safer. It made me wonder how easy it would be for the cops to entrap someone.
Here is an excerpt from the story above ...
Nelson, 62, was charged with one felony count each of promoting a sexual performance by a child and possessing a sexual performance by a child.
Nelson was taken into custody by investigators with State Police and the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. The investigation began after members of the State Police Computer Crimes Unit became aware that an IP address located in Stillwater had downloaded photographs depicting child pornography, according to a news release.
Is this in Florida? I think so but not sure. DWS your hold on things is slipping. This will surely not be a good thing for Patrick Nelson's run for office.
OOPS! This kind of stuff will not be helping Chelsea either. She will be running for Congress from past reports. I am still coming off my Jet Lag. My clock is upside down. This should be blasted all over by those of you that live in NY. The Dem. Party needs to clean house big time. There have been other NY arrests as well, a couple of big ones I believe. Was not one of them the aide to Cuomo?
Can't really blame you for not knowing what state this was in. I've noticed a trend on Internet reporting consistently omitting the state from articles. This makes it more difficult to research, at least at a glance, because many states have cities and towns of the same name.
YES, I find that so infuriating. My husband and I have noticed this on the news as well when reporting about foreign countries. They name the small town but not the state, as in Mexico. As we know Real Journalism is nearly dead.
Ha Ha. Yeah, remember that now. They are all covering up for them because they are also involved. Many of the top MSM are caught up in this stuff as well. If we really deeply investigated them all, they would go scurrying out like a bunch of rats out of a burning building. I hope and pray for this day. Oh Please Let It Be.
▼ Miercoles
First post... I don't know law enforcement. This seems weird to me. The felonies appear to be about a single video that he possessed and offered to someone.
The warrant was about photos he downloaded but they are not part of the charges.
So the police knew he had visited a site perhaps set up by them or taken over by them or how would they know he visited?
What I'm wondering is how easy would it be to set someone up. Can photos be hidden on a home page so visiting the page automatically downloads the child porn onto your temp file. Now the police can pick and choose who they want to harass with warrants. In this case they might be trying to destroy the mayor or his son or get a two-fer.
This guy had a single video that offended the officers. Not an overflowing database. He might have many many photos but not offending enough to charge him with. Don't the cops try to throw the book at you? Do they hold back charges and add them in later even if the photos were found on his PC at the same time as the video?
I'm not commenting on this guy's guilt or innocence, I'm thinking of you researchers who are going onto all kinds of crazy sites I won't go. Isn't every page you visit a download? They are all preserved on a temp file, right?
I wish I knew more so I knew how to think about it. This story is not like others I've cheered for. People had tons of shit. The story doesn't make me feel safer. It made me wonder how easy it would be for the cops to entrap someone.
Here is an excerpt from the story above ...
Nelson, 62, was charged with one felony count each of promoting a sexual performance by a child and possessing a sexual performance by a child.
Nelson was taken into custody by investigators with State Police and the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. The investigation began after members of the State Police Computer Crimes Unit became aware that an IP address located in Stillwater had downloaded photographs depicting child pornography, according to a news release.
▼ Mad_As_Hell
I don't know the ins and outs of this case but it's possible they found more but are using this one instance as a sample to base their charges on?
▼ carmencita
Is this in Florida? I think so but not sure. DWS your hold on things is slipping. This will surely not be a good thing for Patrick Nelson's run for office.
▼ Mad_As_Hell
It's upstate New York
▼ carmencita
OOPS! This kind of stuff will not be helping Chelsea either. She will be running for Congress from past reports. I am still coming off my Jet Lag. My clock is upside down. This should be blasted all over by those of you that live in NY. The Dem. Party needs to clean house big time. There have been other NY arrests as well, a couple of big ones I believe. Was not one of them the aide to Cuomo?
▼ cult_of_philanthropy
Can't really blame you for not knowing what state this was in. I've noticed a trend on Internet reporting consistently omitting the state from articles. This makes it more difficult to research, at least at a glance, because many states have cities and towns of the same name.
▼ carmencita
YES, I find that so infuriating. My husband and I have noticed this on the news as well when reporting about foreign countries. They name the small town but not the state, as in Mexico. As we know Real Journalism is nearly dead.
▼ Mad_As_Hell
The head of NY Young Democrats was arrested on similar charges - not a peep from MSM of course
▼ carmencita
Ha Ha. Yeah, remember that now. They are all covering up for them because they are also involved. Many of the top MSM are caught up in this stuff as well. If we really deeply investigated them all, they would go scurrying out like a bunch of rats out of a burning building. I hope and pray for this day. Oh Please Let It Be.