Relevancy: The Cannibal Queen and Sanders are central to Pizzagate. They were political rivals in the last election and the role of POTUS is key in carrying out The Cannibal Elite's agenda. The emails in the original Wikileaks drop are what started and revealed Pizzagate, and Lynn Forester de Rothschild should always be taken seriously.

This is a follow-up post to my first submission:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2104750

While I knew the information about having leverage and Sanders having an agreement was important, I had no idea how important! Turns out that Sanders’ criticism of Killary’s wealth was a HUGE deal. So much so, it pulled a big dog into the fight! What big dog? None other than Lynn Forester de Rothschild herself. She wrote an email of her own, championing her little wittle maligned Killary. The original email Reynolds sent is dated May 26, 2015, and Puppet Master Rothschild’s (hereinafter referred to as PM Rothschild) is dated May 28, 2015. The exact same issue Is being addressed so there’s no doubt that the same incident provoked both and that this is the classic tale of the snowball rolling down a mountain causing an avalanche:

Here is what PM Rothschild wrote:

http://linkis.com/wikileaks.org/podest/HpPVO

From: Lynn Forester de Rothschild < [email protected] Date: May 28, 2015 at 9:44:12 AM EDT To: Nick Merrill nmerrill@hrcoffice.com , "Cheryl Mills ( [email protected] )" cheryl.mills@gmail.com

Subject: FW: POLITICO Playbook

Morning,

I am sure you are working on this, but clearly, the opposition is trying to undercut Hillary’s reputation for honesty (the number one characteristic people look for in a President according to most polls)…..and also to benefit from an attack on wealth that Dems did the most to start……I am sure we need to fight back against both of these attacks.

Xoxo

Lynn

PM Rothschild herself addressing the attacks on Killary's reputation? What reputation? The one where political enemies wind up dead? Or the one where she “allegedly” spirits kids off the streets of Haiti never to be seen again? It’s not mentioned, but what is mentioned is that the PM is out of sorts over the accusation of “wealth” and finds it troubling. She further points a sharpened painted talon at the Dems for starting the ball rolling.

But what about The Cannibal Queen? How did HRC take Sanders’ jabs? Well, MSN helps us out by publishing an excerpt from her book, “What the Fuck Happened?”

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/clinton-blasts-sanders-for-lasting-damage-in-2016-race/ar-AArldlI?OCID=ansmsnnews11

She said that his attacks against her during the primary caused "lasting damage" and paved the way for "(Donald) Trump's 'Crooked Hillary' campaign." …

"When I finally challenged Bernie during a debate to name a single time I changed a position or a vote because of a financial contribution, he couldn't come up with anything," Clinton wrote. "Nonetheless, his attacks caused lasting damage, making it harder to unify progressives in the general election and paving the way for Trump's 'Crooked Hillary' campaign."

Evidently, she’s still pissed. REALLY pissed, but let’s get back to PM Rothschild’s email. The memo is addressed to Nick Merrill. So who the hell is he? Well, it’s another meteoric rise story – much like Cinderella. In rags one moment, and marrying the prince and living in the castle the next. Don’t know how many of these we’ve run across as concerns the dems. And you know the promotion isn’t merited. These scumsuckers are nothing but assholes who deserve jail time, but instead they zoom up the chain of command into high-powered positions. Ed Buck was a civilian who followed that pattern. So is the “Sleep Your Way to the Top by Bedding Willie Brown” Kamala Harris. But here’s a little something on Nick who somehow started as a staff worker and ended up as HRC’s campaign press secretary? WHAT? Yes, but first let me perform due diligence in providing a reliable source that proves Nick was a nothing burger:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/gallery/2016/07/2016-hillary-clinton-campaign-entourage-advisors-aides-photo-gallery-huma-abedin-nick-merrill-palmieri-robby-mook-john-podesta-000647?slide=0

The affable traveling press secretary joined Clinton world as a lowly advance staffer on the 2008 campaign, gained Clinton’s trust at the State Department and was one of a few staffers who remained with her between Foggy Bottom and the 2016 campaign, serving as a one-man press team in her personal office.

Hey, we all know how that happens … we start our new job flipping burgers and the next day we’re sitting with Warren Buffet on a divan in the master’s chambers. But about Nick, here’s a REALLY interesting article about the Timeline of those HRC emails (note him holding the purple umbrella – this will come into play in another post I’m working on – or supposed to be working on):

http://www.thompsontimeline.com/tag/nick-merrill/

Now the above link ties in perfectly with what the subject of PM Rothschild’s email:. POLITICO Playbook. Keep your eye on the moving ball and do not let it out of your sight.

January 13, 2015: Clinton’s press secretary has “teed-up stories” for a New York Times reporter before and she has “never disappointed.”
Nick Merrill, Clinton’s campaign press secretary, writes an email memo to Clinton’s other core staffers (including John Podesta and Robby Mook) who are developing a strategy that is described as being “designed to plant stories on Clinton’s decision-making process about whether to run for president.” The email names Maggie Haberman who at the time writes for Politico, but will switch to covering the election for the New York Times one month later. Merrill writes, “We have ha[d] a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed. … [F]or this we think we can achieve our objective and do the most shaping by going to Maggie.” …

So that’s what PM Rothschild was sticking her nose into … er, I mean, inquiring about. They were losing their stooge/parrot at Politico and looking to replace her with another stooge/parrot, but this brouhaha about Sanders interrupted discussing solutions to the problem of Haberman leaving.

But what about the Cannibal Queen? Take a look at a recent Politico article:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/09/07/hillary-clinton-book-bernie-sanders-democrats-215584

Hillary’s Message To Dems: Don’t Give Bernie The Keys Her new book relaunches the Democratic civil war of 2016.

And what’s Bernie saying?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bernie-sanders-responds-to-hillary-clinton-book-criticism-stop-%E2%80%98arguing-about-2016%E2%80%99/ar-AAru2M1

Earlier in the evening, on MSNBC’s All In with Chris Hayes, Sanders responded to a section of Clinton’s book that references, of all things, the film There’s Something About Mary. “A deranged hitchhiker says he’s come up with a brilliant plan. Instead of the famous ‘eight-minute abs’ exercise routine, he’s going to market ‘seven-minute abs.’ It’s the same, just quicker,” Clinton writes of the movie. “Then the driver, played by Ben Stiller, says, ‘Well, why not six-minute abs?’ That’s what it was like in policy debates with Bernie. We would propose a bold infrastructure investment plan or an ambitious new apprenticeship program for young people, and then Bernie would announce basically the same thing, but bigger.” “Does anybody really believe that?” Sanders asked of the notion that he “stole” Clinton’s best ideas. “The truth is, and the real story is, that the ideas we brought forth in that campaign, which were so crazy and so radical, have increasingly become mainstream.”

So Huma Abedin got that quote from Killary. It was an excerpt from her book, but the dynamic has changed and Sanders is not backing down.. It means there’s a new “agreement” and HRC is not liking it one bit. The Puppet Masters are seeing Sanders’ popularity as something they can use in 2020 and Killary is going ballistic.

As for this “leverage”, like West Virginia, there is an opioid crisis. It’s what happens when you have Dim I mean, Dem leadership.

https://www.timesargus.com/articles/vermonts-opioid-crisis-looking-at-the-numbers/

VERMONT’S OPIOID CRISIS: Looking at the numbers

And I had to include this one. This idiot in New Hampshire wants to solve the opioid crisis by not using the word “addict” and instead call it: SUD. That’s person with a substance use disorder”. Yup, normalizing addiction by calling it SUD will help a lot!

http://digital.vpr.net/term/opioid-addiction

As for the leverage, this scandal has the right timing. It's an essay on gang raping women. Note the date: May 31, 2015. Was this leak partial payback for insulting Killary? I don’t think it was THE leverage, maybe a hint at what they had onhim? Like I said, the timing is extremely suspicious and this certainly is lurid and out of keeping with his squeaky clean image. It had him backpedaling.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2015/05/31/bernie-sanders-new-claim-about-his-gang-rape-essay-and-fifty-shades-of-grey/

The Vermont senator — who’s running for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination — has come under fire for an essay he wrote in which he claimed that women fantasize about being gang-raped. On “Meet the Press” Sunday, he compared his very old essay to a very new literary phenomenon. “This is a piece of fiction that I wrote in 1972, I think,” Sanders said. “That was 43 years ago. It was very poorly written and if you read it, what it was dealing with was gender stereotypes, why some men like to oppress women, why other women like to be submissive, you know, something like ‘Fifty Shades of Grey.'”

Yeah, right.