purpleabyss

"The b. of joy is the project Bernard was advertising in his famous interview."

Um, no? Please give me a time-stamp in that interview where he "was advertising" the B of Joy.

"This is mainly why he did the interview."

Wrong again. He revealed his exact reasons for doing the interview in the third part - but seems like you didn't pay much attention to it.

"This one gets deeper into what we can find out about him and his project b. of joy."

Where exactly is the content about him (Ronald Bernard) here? Quoting from his interview is not exactly "getting deeper" is it? More than half the article deals with Hans van der Liet and what he likes on facebook.

"Hans van der Liet, lawyer working for the b. of joy, is a big supporter oft Israel. Isn’t that odd? I his video interview, Ronald Bernard made some remarkable claims that many people consider anti-Semitic. [...]"

You realize you just provided great evidence that Mr. Bernard can't be the anti-semite certain people accuse him to be? If he was, why would he have someone on his team whose favorite topic is fighting anti-semitism and making no secret about that? Exactly.

Why would someone whose favorite topic is fighting anti-semitism be on the same team with an anti-semite? Exactly.

Is that what you would call shooting yourself in the foot? Great job :D

neverobey

You draw your conclusions, I draw mine. I just ignore your tone and tell you once again: If you want to question my agenda: Fine, always good to not just trust anyone blindly. Go ahead, ask your questions but please be a little more cooperative. I dpn't know why you seem to have a personal problem with me as a person.

purpleabyss

Go ahead, ask your questions

Yeah I did, how about you answer them? Also the questions in this thread . Or try to debunk my arguments? But what kind of cop-out reply is this answer?

I dpn't know why you seem to have a personal problem with me as a person.

Um, I don't...? Paranoid much? I don't even know you, why would I have a problem with you personally? What I have a problem with is the content of your articles - your attempted character assassination of Ronald Bernard.

Besides, you claim to be a former journalist and we have to take your word for it, right? Great. Let's see some proof for that claim.

neverobey

I really don't get it. Why would you need a proove for my life? Just take the informations about the b of joy and do with it whatecver you like. I am investigating pizzagate like you are. Give me a proove for whoever you are?! What's that all about?

purpleabyss

Why are you evading my questions like that? Ok, don't give me prove of whoever you are - but if you claim you were involved in the msm once then why so shy? Let's see some articles or whatever you have published. Or let's not, whatever.

But how about you answer my other questions? Your evasiveness isn't really helping your credibility.

And you're not "investigating pizzagate" by attacking Mr. Bernard or the B of Joy. Not by a long shot.

neverobey

peace, brother. I pray for you.

purpleabyss

I'm female.

2impendingdoom

Oh FFS! everybody just go switch your accounts to a local credit union and fuck the banks. We don't need this guy or Jamie Dimon either.

carmencita

I don't follow any of the Bernard stuff, really. I do not have time. But if the pope is ok, in relation to this b. of joy, then I do not want any part of it. BTW, I used to be a practicing Catholic.