pby1000

And she still lost. Lol.

Jimmycog

And still a loser

Commoner

@Are_we_sure

Our government: 1. Used and paid for a fake dossier to 2. Lie to a FISA Court to 3. Surveil an opponent’s political campaign to 4. Ensure the win to Hillary by 5. Using our intel community to do the dirty work AND 6. When Trump complained about it, the media called him a fool. 7. Then, the Obama holdovers/Comey and crew, further used the KNOWINGLY fake dossier to obtain warrants to search Paul Manafort’s home, pick the front door lock of Paul Manafort, enter his home in the wee hours of the morning.. 8. STOLE priviledged communication between Manafort and his lawyer…. 9. Threatening an impending indictment. What do you think such a government would do to you or me?

(credit to another site)

RweSure

You think the Intel Community used the dossier to ensure the win to Hillary? Because they didn't acknowledge the dossier. They didn't acknowledge any investigation into the Trump campaign even though a FISA warrant had been issued for Manafort. So you have this wrong.

Comey intervened to ensure Hillary won? Can you say that with a straight face? Can you remember how Comey did intervene in late October? Because he didn't need to do that at all. In fact, following DOJ requirements meant he shouldn't intervene.

Threatening an impending indictment?

Manafort is getting indicted. Also notifying targets of an impending indictment is common and in part of the US attorney's manual https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-11000-grand-jury#9-11.153

9-11.153 - Notification of Targets

When a target is not called to testify pursuant to USAM 9-11.150, and does not request to testify on his or her own motion (see USAM 9-11.152), the prosecutor, in appropriate cases, is encouraged to notify such person a reasonable time before seeking an indictment in order to afford him or her an opportunity to testify before the grand jury, subject to the conditions set forth in USAM 9-11.152. Notification would not be appropriate in routine clear cases or when such action might jeopardize the investigation or prosecution because of the likelihood of flight, destruction or fabrication of evidence, endangerment of other witnesses, undue delay or otherwise would be inconsistent with the ends of justice.

Dressage2

👏 Bravo!! Remember, HRC spent a $Billion on her campaign, had Qs ahead of time before debates, roped off reporters, hid from press corp almost a year, had DNC rigging her primaries, destroyed her emails under subpoena, Bitbleached her servers, voter fraud, lied so much to voters she lost track, and after all this shit, she still lost!

Are_we_sure

Hi. TruePundit lies to you. Why would you believe True Pundit?

Look at the tweet. Look at the time

https://i1.wp.com/truepundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/bitch1.jpg

Now compare it to the Slate story. What you mean TruePundit didn't link to the Slate article so you could check the time yourself? I'm shocked.

Here's the link they didn't want you to see. Look at the time.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html

Commoner

But a small, tightly knit community of computer scientists who pursue such work—some at cybersecurity firms, some in academia, some with close ties to three-letter federal agencies—is also spurred by a sense of shared idealism and considers itself the benevolent posse that chases off the rogues and rogue states that try to purloin sensitive data and infect the internet with their bugs. “We’re the Union of Concerned Nerds,” in the wry formulation of the Indiana University computer scientist L. Jean Camp. In late spring, this community of malware hunters placed itself in a high state of alarm. Word arrived that Russian hackers had infiltrated the servers of the Democratic National Committee, an attack persuasively detailed by the respected cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike

Word arrived that Russian hackers had infiltrated the servers of the Democratic National Committee,

This^ premise is based on something they knew to be false. Russian did not infiltrate the DNC server. Somebody leaked the info

this community of malware hunters placed itself in a high state of alarm
Huh??

Which community is he talking about, the corrupt Obama CIA operatives?

“We wanted to help defend both campaigns, because we wanted to preserve the integrity of the election,” says one of the academics, who works at a university that asked him not to speak with reporters because of the sensitive nature of his work.

What sensitive nature of his work?

found what looked like malware emanating from Russia, The researchers quickly dismissed their initial fear that the logs represented a malware attack. The communication wasn’t the work of bots. The irregular pattern of server lookups actually resembled the pattern of human conversation—conversations that began during office hours in New York and continued during office hours in Moscow.

Duh!! Obama's CIA was behind all of it, to make it look like Russian.

You seriously get your news from this?

Hey, one more question: Was Trump right when he said Trump Tower was wiretapped during the Obama Admin.?

If you care to see the truth read this https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/09/19/revelations-of-comey-wiretapping-manafort-may-explain-uncomfortable-march-20th-congressional-answer/

Jem777

Hi @Are_We_Sure for checking in...you are a fucking idiot..who links to Slate an outright propaganda news organization like Washington Post, NYT, CNN, MSNBC, Fox half the time.

True Pundit is actually a whistleblower publication. There info is from whitehats? You are obviously a black hat 🎩 as I've stated before. Tell George Soros I said Hi when you pick up your check!

@TheHolyGrail , @jangles , @Dressage2 , @scrazie @Carmecita @blacksmith21 @TrishaUk @Ang23

Dressage2

Hey shill, don't forget about CIA crap software Wikileaks dumped in Vault 7. Posted to re-fresh your memory.

RweSure

Look above your head. There goes the point.

The Slate article is evidence. TP claims the Clinton tweet came out before the slate article and thus they must be getting info in other ways. This false. The Clinton tweet is 3 hours After the Slate article.

Jem777

James explain yourself!

Fucking moron @Are_We_Sure who thinks he can switch his name to @Rwesure and everyone thinks this must be a different guy. Many people here give you credit like you are some D-HRC supporter.

You could care less about HRC or anyone else except your masters in the DeepState.

Hey I get it your a blackmailed pedophile who likes to fuck little children and want that fresh supply to keep coming.

No worries bro....you are scared and wetting your pants that you will be next on the assasin hit list.

Want a recommendation for a pedophile support group? Need some mental health counseling because they have a gun to your head.

Don't be scared. You are doing a good job for George Soros and his hit teams..Keep up the good work. I recommend a raise.

I will forward my recommendation to the Open Society Foundation and Cc: the Feds

Now James I realize threatening has always worked for you but it is over buddy. Tell your mom and dad you fucked up.

@Dressage2 @Commoner @jangles @TheHolyGrail @carmecita @blacksmith21 @darknight111

Dressage2

💥💥💥💥💥

RweSure

Fucking moron @Are_We_Sure who thinks he can switch his name to @Rwesure and everyone thinks this must be a different guy.

Are you truly this stupid? Or just too angry to think?

You can't really think I chose Rwesure as some sort of secret name can you?

If you believe, anybit of the rest of what you have posted, you are an insane person

Dressage2

Yes, we can really believe it. Shills usually don't step out of their small box unless they get that raise. You're still here so evidently you didn't get one.

RweSure

You want to admit to believing something really stupid? Uh, OK. Be my guest.

LongDongKeyhote

They do. They say the same thing for me having @DanKeyhote . Then they do some half-baked good-cop/bad-cop thing. It's a form of larping.

TheHolySnail

@Are_We_Sure @Rwesure John, Jerry wants a word with you upstairs.

RweSure

????

TheHolySnail

John.

Jerry wants a word with you upstairs.

TheHolySnail

@Jem777 Speaking poorly about George Soros at this instance is not recommended.

TheHolySnail

@crensch What's this charade here brother?

Crensch

1) Who are you?

2) Why should I care?

3) Gas yourself.

TheHolySnail

Sorry I meant to ping @reprobate

Easy mistake to make.

darkknight111

"But..but...muh Russians, it was her turn, waahhhh".

Look how fast the "Leftist Elite Defender Shill" comes to jump to the defense of his ever so precious Crooked Hillary.

The reason he has so many accounts is so he can make more shill comments.

Go away snow flake. Nobody trusts you around here. Nobody believes you since you're a known shill.

Go do something of actual value to society, like help expose elite pedophile rings. If you would do that, maybe more people would have trusted you.

Jem777

Relevant to Pizzagate because it demonstrates the horrendous abuse of power and confirms HRC while under FBI investigation was getting Top Secret Classified briefings on an FBI wiretap of competing Pressidential Nominee....Pizzagate was also being investigated and there were many high level assasinations....She maintains TS Security Clearance now so is getting briefings.

@ESOTERICshade

Dressage2

And she still is running free through the milk and bottled water aisles of Costco to this day!

Jem777

Disgusting...so she needs to go away.

LA_Trump

The level of corruption is mind blowing.