[–]goonsack 1 point 11 months ago

I don't understand where this part comes from?

The following organization rejected your message: mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com . S,.:nt by Mil:,msoft Exchange Server 2007 P.Nagncstic informatirm for avdmhlistraters: Generating server: CIATINET08.clinton.local sbwhoeop rntain-c.lc05,r1000.mx,aoi.corn. #554 5,2.1 : (HVU:62) http:ilpostrnasterinfo.aol,cornierrors,1421hvub2.html ## Original message headers: Received from 'L 1fe80::3;7c:8a53:432C:37 a 9 b y CLNTINET08.clinton.local hie80::3c3c:8a15:1520:37a9ci-.11:) maoU Sa . 24 Dec 2011 07:05:51 -0500 From: H <HDR225ciir,tonemail.com> To: "'sbwhoep '" <sbwhoeop Date: Sat, 24 Sec 2011 07:05:21 -0500 Subject: Re: Hdppy holidays! From Fe tranabel Notice it originates from From: H <[email protected] >

permalinkembed

[–]rake16[S] 4 points 11 months ago

Search for the country in the main email search. That is how I found it looking for rejected emails people may have missed.

                From:[email protected]
                To: [email protected]
                Date: 2015-05-21 17:24
                Subject: Re: do u have two minutes?



                Sid's ass?

Sent from my iPhone

On May 21, 2015, at 3:24 PM, John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com<mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com > wrote:

I can sink my teeth into that.

On Thursday, May 21, 2015, Glenn Thrush gthrush@politico.com<mailto:gthrush@politico.com > wrote: I'm not proud of what I do, but they provide free snacks

And BTW, I'm working on a longer-term entirely substantive story u are going to want to ignore me on even more: The formulation of her income inequality policy!

Glenn Thrush Chief Political Correspondent, POLITICO Senior Staff Writer, POLITICO Magazine Cell (call first): 202-731-4974 Desk: 703-647-8543 http://www.politico.com/reporters/GlennThrush.html

From: John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','john.podesta@gmail.com'); > Date: Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 11:28 AM To: Glenn Thrush gthrush@politico.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gthrush@politico.com'); > Subject: Re: do u have two minutes?

Boy, you are really whetting my appetite to return your calls.

On Thursday, May 21, 2015, Glenn Thrush gthrush@politico.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gthrush@politico.com'); > wrote:

I'm doing a Sidney thing (your favorite subject) and want to clear some stuff I've been hearing (namely that he's always been a pain in the ass to u because he ignores appropriate channels of influence)

Glenn Thrush Chief Political Correspondent, POLITICO Senior Staff Writer, POLITICO Magazine Cell (call first): 202-731-4974 Desk: 703-647-8543 http://www.politico.com/reporters/GlennThrush.html

                From:[email protected]
                To: [email protected]
                Date: 2015-05-28 12:37
                Subject: Re:

            Great on the memo. It always amazes me that people like Sid either

completely lack self awareness or self respect. Maybe both. Will you promise to shoot me if I ever end up like that?

Re: New Clinton emails

From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2016-01-01 20:01 Subject: Re: New Clinton emails

Sid is lost in his own web of conspiracies. I pay zero attention to what he says.

On Friday, January 1, 2016, Brent Budowsky brentbbi@webtv.net wrote:

John, assume I wrote a thousand words about this. It is disquieting that when HRC was secretary of state she spent a good time of time doing gossip emails with Sid Blumenthal about various matters, the ubiquitous Lanny Davis shilling for himself in pathetic ways, and Neera Tanden gossiping about what Soros thinks of Obama. At least Tanden I regard as a serious person. Sid and Lanny I do not by standards of a secretary of state or potential president.

I was not in touch with you at the time of the healthcare debate, but what Sid suggests does not strike me as your style. I was in very regular and close touch with Daschle at the time, and he would never have said to the press what Sid suggests, and since I am in the press I know those were not his views. I guarantee that based on direct personal knowledge of Tom's views and actions at the time. Blumenthal did not have the slightest idea of what he was talking about in his girlie gossip with the secretary of state about this. Why she places such great stock over so much time in these exchanges with Blumenthal is mystifying to me---and frankly troublesome.

This whole subject, to use vernacular, gives me the creeps. Secretaries of state, presidential candidates and presidents should not be spending their time on this kind of minor league stuff.

Sent from my iPad