rickman

So gay guy/Alefantis, library/P&P shop, chickenlover/chickenlover, associating kids with adult sex/same.

Matt and Trey knew exactly what they were mocking with this one and it comes after the Chickenhawk paedophile documentary.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

Another important element to these pervs, is that they attach themselves to some faux charity. Another term is "false compassion". In this case "learning to read". Another episode 'nambla' about equality and "all that crap". South Park called out these faux charities with the Clintons in the White House at that time.

Also, interestingly enough Speaker Paul Ryan is a huge Ayn Rand fan boy. Atlas is also another roman pagan related figure. Related to that particular book, the authority figures in this episode don't display the omnipotence and or magnamity that the book portrays of such figures. Barbrady's simply did his job despite his shortcomings and eventually caught the chickenf*cker. His rejection of the atlas shrugged book was a really clever insight.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

Don't recall the context however normally chickenhawk is a term Ventura uses for politicians that awoided military service, get into office and suddenly hawks.

AgainstPedos

For many years I've heard it re a "hawk" who preys on little chickens. The hawk is an older, stronger, often very heavy, totally unappealing man desiring to prey on innocent little kids.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

It may be a double entendre as well, which Ventura/SEALS use that term to really jab at such politicians.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

It's likely South Park used that term on purpose, however it's also possible that the pedo sodomite community owned the term after this episode as a badge of honor, inside joke type thing as well. Either way, keep in mind the bookmobile, Politics and Prose is a couple doors down with the kids section underground! These f-ing sodomites. So sick of them getting away with this crap.

TruthEarthOrg

Wow I forgot about the bookstore next to Comet that you mentioned...crazy...Barf..

HighLevelInsider

Did you ever see the episode about Super Adventure Club , the old men that travel around the world the have sex with children?

TruthEarthOrg

Yes! Very disturbing..

HighLevelInsider

The behavior depicted is certainly disturbing, but it's quite courageous for the South Park team to go so far to expose it.

darkknight111

Let's also not forget the episode where they rip NAMBLA a new one for being a bunch of disgusting pedophiles trying to justify their behaviour. I've been wondering if South Park has been trying to warn us about pedophiles for years, using humor as a way to help red pill.

Entertainment can be an effective red pill tool. For example, Iron Man 3 is about the anatomy and methodology of false flags. Captain America: Winter Soldier is about Operation Paperclip and to a lesser extent, MKUltra. The Angry Birds Movie is an allegory to what's really going on with the Syrian Refuge Crisis.

Major spoilers ahead. Persona 5 is a MASSIVE red pill video game for those who understand its deeper truths, especially the final act. Allegories to the Deep State, Hillary Clinton, Monsanto abound.

TruthEarthOrg

You just gave us a bottle of 1000 red pills in your post...

AgainstPedos

Almost all popular horror movies are designed to communicate fears of pedos and predators, as well as other evil abuse.

Drnoway

Have you seen lego 3d? It's great.

druhill007

gonna have to give that game a look then

1_61803399

Persona 5 is based as fuck, it's true.

srayzie

I am guilty of liking South Park. Since Pizzagate, I can really see how they use humor to desensitize people. They make fun of perverts.

carmencita

Why does anyone even watch this garbage? If no one watched it there would be no reason for them to create it. Sick stuff. Thanks for posting to clue us in, but if anybody out there is still watching, go cold turkey. Edit: Wow. The shills are out full force. Or people are getting really touchy. No more a place to speak your mind.

spacewitch

I still watch some of those shows, because they are interesting as they give some clues & private jokes that we can pick up on, regarding pizzagate and the whole "satanic/globalist/deep state" shit.

carmencita

If you want to hear something very interesting that @can 'tsleepawink and I have discovered please see this thread https://voat.co/v/pizzagatewhatever/2155035 It connects Rigby Idaho to the LDS and to so many other things. It involves the trucker Wm Gray. It also ties in relatives of Mitt Romney. Amazing and also it includes Eleanor Rigby by the Beatles.

TruthEarthOrg

The episode is about a man who goes around raping 'chickens'. I couldn't help but think that the South Park writers were trying to convey this terminology back when this episode was created. It could be a coincidence though. However, let us not forget the episode of South Park where 'The Super Adventure Club' that brainwashed the character 'Chef' was a bunch of old men going around the world raping kids for their energy...

Oldno7

They were also one of the first to expose NAMBLA in the episode Cartman joins NAMBLA.

Magonia

Someone was just streaming that episode on YouTube yesterday and I remember the part where the kids were like “we’re all about love and equality and all that crap, but you fuck kids, seriously dude, fuck you”

I remember reading something a long time ago about the creators connections to Columbine and even Jonbenet. It really is a small world...

StSimonTrentPray4Us

The Columbine kids had a sodomite pedophile older "friend" in the neighborhood that gave them alcohol etc. They were also devout darwinists and did the crime on hitler's bday. Trey Parker was interviewed about this event on Bowling for Columbine and he nor Michael Moore went anywhere close to these issues.

Crensch

They were also devout darwinists

No such thing. Understanding evolution doesn't make having the knowledge and using it anything resembling "devout". Nobody worships Darwin.

eagleshigh

They were also devout darwinists

You say this as if it's a problem. @crensch

StSimonTrentPray4Us

Yes, the british invasion of this godless ideology is a great threat to our Constitutional government which affrims that our rights come from our Creator. Nothing good has come from that stupid grotesch and morbid ideology. Just child and baby skulls are are the fruits of darwinism.

eagleshigh

Nothing good has come from that stupid grotesch and morbid ideology

Nothing good has come from Darwinism? Bold claim. Also wrong.

Yes. Knowing that all life shares a common origin is "nothing good [coming] from this stupid and grotesque ideology"? What's" stupid and grotesque" about it?

Just child and baby skulls are are the fruits of darwinism.

This is retarded.

@crensch

StSimonTrentPray4Us

People with an extra chromosome are "retarded". You're just further refuting your own stupid ideology.

eagleshigh

People with an extra chromosome are "retarded".

Meaningless to this conversation.

You're just further refuting your own stupid ideology.

Quote me on how I further refuted my "own stupid ideology."

@crensch

StSimonTrentPray4Us

You're welcome to reject the Creator like Marx, Mao, Lenin etc. Marx loved darwin's book. Charlie married his cousin btw and lemented about his child probably which died as a result of his racist inbreeding darwinism. Sad! There are plenty of godless countries to take you and your stupid ideology in. Here are rights come from our Creator. Please respect that.

Crensch

You're welcome to reject the Creator like Marx, Mao, Lenin etc. Marx loved darwin's book.

Marx was Jewish and loved communism.

The other two weren't human, either.

Charlie married his cousin btw and lemented about his child probably which died as a result of his racist inbreeding darwinism.

How is that relevant to anything? Poe did the same thing, but that doesn't mean his literature is garbage.

Sad! There are plenty of godless countries to take you and your stupid ideology in. Here are rights come from our Creator.

Your creator is a sad fiction that weak individuals tell themselves to feel better about not actually making a difference in the grand scheme of things. It's a narcissistic vanity of epic proportions.

eagleshigh

So you're strawmanning me. Good job. Are you saying that evolutionism is wrong? Charles Darwin married his cousin, therefore his theory is wrong? Mao, Marx and Lenin liked Darwin's books and were godless, therefore Darwinism refuted? Lol

@crensch

antiracist

Hey faggot, how's Nagel. Nah, argue like shitheads about if evolution is real. Fuck you eagleshigh.

@bojangles @sarmegahhikkitha

Sar, your God is a lie. I challenge you to a debate on prime moverism and I'll mop the floor with ya. What's that? You want me to find God through faith? God knows the rules I'll play by. Reason or bust.

Fuck you eagleshigh.

SarMegahhikkitha

You said my God allows rapes to happen, meaning the prime mover is my God. And why would I debate a fake person?

antiracist

Because you subscribe to prime moverism.

@eagleshigh @bojangles

SarMegahhikkitha

Then what would we debate? You can't prove using logic what falls out of the Prime Mover. According to you the Prime Mover has no Will, so He never created this fake reality. It's not even really clear to me why illusory reality would even need to a creator.

antiracist

Why didn't you take up my challenge?

@eagleshigh @bojangles

SarMegahhikkitha

You're not real

antiracist

Answer about the prime mover premise. Come on.

@eagleshigh @bojangles

SarMegahhikkitha

First prove to me you're not just an illusion.

Then prove to me why I should have a desire to answer when desire is illusory.

Then answer me: what doth life?

antiracist

I think therefore I am.

Desire is action with expectation of reward. Action for intrinsic love is acceptable. Philosophy is for its own sake.

Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more.

@eagleshigh @bojangles

SarMegahhikkitha

So why couldn't the Prime Mover have intrinsic love for Himself and be motivated to create us? If He can't have Will then I can't have Will, it's only an illusion, only He's real.

antiracist

Because creation requires potential, and God is pure act. Potential doesn't exist.

@eagleshigh @bojangles

SarMegahhikkitha

Then creation doesn't exist so I don't exist.

antiracist

You, God, exists.

SarMegahhikkitha

I, God, don't argue with myself.

antiracist

Does God think? What does God think of First Way?

@eagleshigh @bojangles

SarMegahhikkitha

According to you, you're God, so you must know you think and what you think about First Way. But if the Infinite is God, Will and Thought have "real" existence insofar as they exist in potentia in a mathetically perfect being, therefore they're concrete.

antiracist

Then I could suicide bc I have a backup copy in God.

antiracist

Shut up.

Antiracist2

There is no prime mover. The topic of debate is the premise that anything which changes is changed by another. https://voat.co/v/Theology/2141534

That premise is false.

You have the intellectual obligation to argue for its truth, given your belief in prime moverism.

I have the intellectual obligation to argue for its falsity, given my lack of belief in prime moverism.

Have at it.

@eagleshigh fag.

@bojangles cool.

Nagel goy.

@crensch is a fucking idiot. eagleshigh you should stop pinging him.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

Those are the fruits of Darwinism. It just gives you an idea of how good it is. Alternatively Bible toting Christians moved into the desolate Great Plains and turned it into a food basket for the world. Those were good fruits. The Constitution was also a fruit of Creationism. Judge for yourself. Take a second look at it. Read up on what the people you mock and despise have to say. Maybe they have some points and you're ugly mocking attitude is not about you, but about the godless ideology you're trying to accommodate. Give it a shot for a week. You can always return to darwinism like how dogs return to their vomit.

Crensch

Maybe they have some points and you're ugly mocking attitude is not about you, but about the godless ideology you're trying to accommodate.

They don't have any points. The Jewish religion gave us nothing but a belief system to crowd around in general - something that separated us from "those other religions".

The science of modern civilization happened in spite of stupid religious belief systems, not because of them.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

The modern University system (note uni-verse) was constructed by the Holy Roman Catholic Church. Galeo was off his rocker and thought the entire universe revolved around the sun. Slap on the wrist with house arrest was for his own good. I have not read this book so its impolite to recommend it, however I have heard very good things. I would encourage you to at least crack it open.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/313011.How_the_Catholic_Church_Built_Western_Civilization

Crensch

The modern University system (note uni-verse) was constructed by the Holy Roman Catholic Church.

The majority of literate people during the dark ages were priests and nobles. Your point?

Galeo was off his rocker and thought the entire universe revolved around the sun.

Your point?

Slap on the wrist with house arrest was for his own good. I have not read this book so its impolite to recommend it, however I have heard very good things.

"I can't argue this point, but let me tell you to read something so that I can pretend I'm right still without doing any work - YOU, however, have to do lots of reading because I AM SO SMART I hand-waved you to a book."

@eagleshigh

StSimonTrentPray4Us

I'm not trying to but heads with you. If you prefer to read what google and amazon recommends, fine. Iron sharpens iron, and I'm not trying to bring you down, or something. Trying to help. You have your freewill. Have a nice day.

Crensch

Iron sharpens Iron, but your own arguments are like wet noodles.

I'll say this, I really have no desire to fight with the christians right now, as I've got much bigger fish to fry.

Y'all are less of a danger to me and my life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness than kikes, niggers, sandniggers, and spics. As such, I've been more or less letting you all have your say.

If you want a fight, keep taking pot shots at those of us that reject not just your god, but all gods. I can promise that I'll beat you at every resolution - scripture, interpretations, facts, logic, internal consistency, external consistency, provenance, canon...

As knowledgeable as I've become about Jews and their bullshit in the past year, that's nothing compared to the 14 years I spent debating christians; while I may be a bit rusty, I can just about guarantee that you'll wind up losing your faith.

If you don't want that, keep your attacks directed towards someone that is actually a danger to your lifestyle. I'll be here to give you satisfaction when the dust clears and our true enemies are all dead.

@eagleshigh

antiracist

It doesn't matter how motivational creationism was for our constitution, and it doesn't matter how big of a faggot @eagleshigh is for sucking the cock of Charles Darwin and Hitler; you do not need God to establish human rights. That is, even if God exists and is the source of our human rights, he need not be. If there were no God, you could construct human rights without him. Eagleshigh is dumb because he doesn't read Nagel, goy.

@bojangles @sarmegahhikkitha

Bojangles

I think natural rights require God, but legal rights don't. You could argue that our founding fathers gave us better legal rights due to their belief in natural rights, but even then, the law remains arbitrary. And there's nothing wrong with that; all law is arbitrary.

The term "human rights" seems like it applies to everyone on the planet, so I don't see that happening unless we end up with some AI or space alien king that is somewhat benevolent, keeps its promises, and rules the entire world with an iron fist (since the people most likely to violate your rights are non-government actors). But this assumes that rights need to be enforceable. If they don't need to be, then we already have the laughable UN Declaration of Human Rights. Mission accomplished!

antiracist

Law isn't arbitrary.

Rights are invisible things, like moral obligations. Regardless of enforcement, people have moral obligations. Regardless of actualization in society, people have rights.

@eagleshigh @sarmegahhikkitha

Hay eaglesdyke why don't you tell me how the existence of rights falls out of Darwinism.

antiracist

re:bowl

lyke dys if u cry everytyme

banned from the forum you posted it to

ahahaha, banned from this one too

StSimonTrentPray4Us

The Founders were not judeo-Christian. No 'jews' signed the Declaration of Independance. 'Jews' contributed zero. None of the Founders wore yamikas, spun dretals or sacrificed children to their babylonian molech god. They studied the just the Christian values, schools and congregations most all thier lives. They also fought the muhammadists who saw them as kaffir.

antiracist

who cares

StSimonTrentPray4Us

Children.

antiracist

You don't need God for human rights.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

UN and Planned Parenthood would agree with that position.

antiracist

I don't care who agrees with the proposition. It is true.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

Christ is True.

antiracist

So is the proposition that you don't need God to construct human rights.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

Who are you sleeping with?

antiracist

Ladies.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

Pick one and marry her. We can chat after.

antiracist

No.

StSimonTrentPray4Us

Thanks for the chat. Cheers.