I see what u are saying. I viewed it as even tho Braverman didn't work for Clinton Foundation for a long time, he was connected to Chelsea for a long time. Trusted enough by her to bring him in.
But I guess the campaign leaker (clearly one of them being Seth Rich) has more to do with the "making example".
Seth Rich is absolutely not the campaign leaker and is not even alleged to be the campaign leaker. And that email came out in 2015.
Seth Rich never worked on the campaign. (Ironically for the folks who claim Seth Rich wanted to damage the DNC and the Clinton Campaign, he was thinking about moving to New York to work on the Clinton Campaign. This is why he was having fights with his girlfriend, she didn't want to move.)
Lol, Seth Rich was a hardcore Bernie supporter, as his social media accounts prove. His gf was on video saying whoever killed him was extremely angry w him. The leaks to wikileaks are from Seth Rich. The fbi changed their stolen weapon "timeframe" on their website to reflect the weapons were stolen between midnight & 2am (before Seth Rich was shot), the police report on said stolen weapons show they were stolen well after Seth Rich was shot, with a very specific timeframe down to the minute. Kim Dotcom can prove Seth Rich was the leak and wrote Congress saying he's testify. Wikileaks offered a reward for info leading to murderer. If u think Seth Rich was Not the leak, then you haven't been paying attention...or...you're just a liberal attempting to debunk facts. Maybe he wasn't the campaign leaker but he was the DNC leaker... which DNC & HRC campaign are nearly the same since DNC promoted HRC. Seth Rich was 100000% the leaker and was also 100000% a Bernie supporter pretending to be a Hillary supporter.
I could be wrong, but I remember them discussing back and forth about the leak and who could've done it and Podesta or one of them said Braverman (or whoever quit the Clinton Foundation, chelsea's friend, i think that was braverman). The date of the email about "making an example of" coincides with their talk about the leak in the foundation.
Coincidence or not, the the "making an example of" is talking about a different situation, the campaign not the Foundation. Podesta did not work at the foundation.
And yes, they did discuss Braverman, back and forth. But the very next email - which the pizzagaters don't focus on - dismisses this possibility because the source is describe as a long time Clinton person which Braverman was not.
This was just another thing where the discussion and the context was misunderstood where it blown up into some giant event.
He sought asylum. You folks will truly believe anything.
The "evidence" he was missing was he hadn't posted on twitter in a while.
The "evidence" he was in "danger" was immediately followed by an email explaining why he wouldn't be in "danger." That email was of course ignored. He was supposedly in "danger" because he was the source for an article. Except they realized he couldn't be the source for the article.
▼ Millennial_Falcon
Eric Braverman, Clinton Foundation CEO
▼ noworldorder
Comey’s FBI put him under protective custody? lol right. Not buying it. He’s probably dead.
▼ Are_we_sure
And what do you base this silliness on?
▼ WakeyWake
Braverman is the one Podesta wanted to make an example out if bc he thought he was the leak in the Clinton Foundation.
▼ Are_we_sure
"the example of" email did not involve the Clinton Foundation.
▼ WakeyWake
Email talking about the leak at Clinton Foundation & Braverman https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/49210#efmAEFAETAHIAK7
▼ Are_we_sure
Look for the very next email that replies to that one.
They dismiss Braverman because he doesn't fit the description. See this part at the top
The conversation continues and they answer who fits that description.
▼ WakeyWake
I see what u are saying. I viewed it as even tho Braverman didn't work for Clinton Foundation for a long time, he was connected to Chelsea for a long time. Trusted enough by her to bring him in.
But I guess the campaign leaker (clearly one of them being Seth Rich) has more to do with the "making example".
▼ Are_we__sure
Seth Rich is absolutely not the campaign leaker and is not even alleged to be the campaign leaker. And that email came out in 2015.
Seth Rich never worked on the campaign. (Ironically for the folks who claim Seth Rich wanted to damage the DNC and the Clinton Campaign, he was thinking about moving to New York to work on the Clinton Campaign. This is why he was having fights with his girlfriend, she didn't want to move.)
▼ WakeyWake
Lol, Seth Rich was a hardcore Bernie supporter, as his social media accounts prove. His gf was on video saying whoever killed him was extremely angry w him. The leaks to wikileaks are from Seth Rich. The fbi changed their stolen weapon "timeframe" on their website to reflect the weapons were stolen between midnight & 2am (before Seth Rich was shot), the police report on said stolen weapons show they were stolen well after Seth Rich was shot, with a very specific timeframe down to the minute. Kim Dotcom can prove Seth Rich was the leak and wrote Congress saying he's testify. Wikileaks offered a reward for info leading to murderer. If u think Seth Rich was Not the leak, then you haven't been paying attention...or...you're just a liberal attempting to debunk facts. Maybe he wasn't the campaign leaker but he was the DNC leaker... which DNC & HRC campaign are nearly the same since DNC promoted HRC. Seth Rich was 100000% the leaker and was also 100000% a Bernie supporter pretending to be a Hillary supporter.
▼ WakeyWake
I could be wrong, but I remember them discussing back and forth about the leak and who could've done it and Podesta or one of them said Braverman (or whoever quit the Clinton Foundation, chelsea's friend, i think that was braverman). The date of the email about "making an example of" coincides with their talk about the leak in the foundation.
▼ Are_we_sure
Coincidence or not, the the "making an example of" is talking about a different situation, the campaign not the Foundation. Podesta did not work at the foundation.
And yes, they did discuss Braverman, back and forth. But the very next email - which the pizzagaters don't focus on - dismisses this possibility because the source is describe as a long time Clinton person which Braverman was not.
This was just another thing where the discussion and the context was misunderstood where it blown up into some giant event.
▼ TimesUp
Eric Braverman went missing after resigning as CEO of the Clinton Foundation, if that's who you're thinking of. He sought asylum, then disappeared. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/03/clinton-foundation-eric-braverman-115598
▼ Are_we_sure
No he did not. This is ludicrous.
He sought asylum. You folks will truly believe anything.
The "evidence" he was missing was he hadn't posted on twitter in a while.
The "evidence" he was in "danger" was immediately followed by an email explaining why he wouldn't be in "danger." That email was of course ignored. He was supposedly in "danger" because he was the source for an article. Except they realized he couldn't be the source for the article.
▼ chronikfunk
eric braverman
▼ chronikfunk
his twitter is just weekly retweets.
▼ chronikfunk
no some other dude, they said he was in russia embassy or something.
▼ RagingShieldMaiden
Eric Braverman.