New Hillary FOIA Emails on State.Gov... Filtered for Pizza? ( pizzagate )

submitted by SoSpricyHotDog

Ok, ok, this is weird. So, I saw the new HRC emails dumped on State.gov:

https://foia.state.gov/search/results.aspx

Then you search for this to filter out the most recent into view "FOIA emails Hillary Clinton"

For shits n giggles I added "+ Pizza" to the search query.

The result was blank. But... not only were the results blank, the original search of "FOIA emails Hillary Clinton" is now also blank. Refreshing doesn't fix it. Clearing cache doesn't fix it. For that browser, I can no longer search for "FOIA emails Hillary Clinton" at all. It's totally blanked out.

Going to another browser allowed me to filter by "FOIA emails Hillary Clinton"

Weird, no?

In fact... any new search I do blocks access to the filtered emails now. No matter the search query. It seems that any search parameter modifiers can somehow block your access after a 2nd attempt.

Did I break something? Anyone else seeing this? Ways to fix?

darkknight111

Somewhat related, I received info that there might be a potential new person of interest.

Cathy L Lanier. Former DC police chief. Member of the Knights of Malta. Friend of John Podesta. High level person in NFL Security.

Need some diggers.

@Commoner

jonnythaiwongy9

Oh my god Podesta and the like are able to just install anyone anywhere, its like a roysl court or something ffs

IShallNotFear

The FOIA website isn't very reliable. It is a government run website, and similar to the infamous healthcare.gov launch, if too many people are using it at once it freezes up.

zeroinstinct

everyone I know is using the FOIA it's almost like a DDoS

weeds-in-the-garden

Press refresh a couple of times to return to normal screen.

Click with mouse search. Pressing enter makes things vanish. Bad UI design.

zeroinstinct

it's clearly the deep state or fake news.

10 days ago I said this bullshit you're all huffing was started by 4chan. you didn't refute it but said sorry and mentioned 2 websites. now i'm back and ready to listen to the evidence you have that precedes this nonsense.

Dig4Dutroux-Holland

The code is real, shillpants. regardless of who made it up it is being used in darknet.

SoSpricyHotDog

I don't have "evidence" - the https://foia.state.gov/search/results.aspx site fucked up in the midst of search queries... I've used it plenty of times before without issues. Thought it was strange, but most likely just a resource drain causing broken search results.

zeroinstinct

I told you 10 days ago that this nonsense was started by 4chan inventing a code. Back then you were talking about Awan, remember?

Well you apologised and told me to look to 2 different websites. Now I ant you to show me the evidence you have before the imaginary code 4chan invented from those hacked emails

SoSpricyHotDog

I was floating over a possible lead as it was being developed... I didn't see much of anything that resulted in a concrete lead that needed to be pursued.

And honestly, no, I don't remember... haha, sorry. I saw your comment, haven't had time to respond/dig deeper.

zeroinstinct

Awan is the floating lead? Doesn't matter that you bring up any key word for Trumps red meat.

You said Pizzagate has evidence that predates Podestas hack.Where is it?

SoSpricyHotDog

Wait... your post is all over the place... you are still focused on the Don Jr. meeting w/ Veselsketnya? You think sensitive material was passed back and forth? Where is it? From the most recent intel I saw this didn't lead to much of anything. And it was already established that the meeting itself wasn't illegal.

As for this:

Don't give me names of websites, explain the evidence other than 4chan inventing a code for hacked email which started this bullshit. I do believe paedophilia is far too rampant in all walks >of life. There has also been cover ups for all kinds of things but that isn't evidence for this, as i'm sure you understand.

i don't see links to the occult, neither do I see strange language, only the type of shorthand everyone uses with friends. It's funny because for all your denials you are admitting here it's all about the "strange languages" which the guys who gave you the grifter was happy to interpret.

You don't think the prior cover-ups and the extent at which they've been covered up, adds anything to what we're collectively looking into? Hampstead, Saville, Epstein, The Dutroux Affair, the Catholic Church, reports of Hollywood pedophelia/cover-ups... none of this causes you to draw any parallels when it comes to the PG evidence?

You don't see links to the occult? Spirit Cooking? Moloch? Mother Moon? Mentions of sacrifices? The artists/musicians that were related to those who are linked to the Podesta links?

You think these are all just innocent jokes? I think they may never be proven, but, that they offer important surrounding context.

zeroinstinct

What is the pizzagate evidence? Lets start there.

You don't see links to Russia? Manafort? Flynn? rohrababacher? Sater? The bit part players who were linked to Russians. Cohn? Page? Stone? Assange? Don jr? Kushner?

Are these are just innocent jokes? I'm sure several of these names will be indicted by the grand jury Mueller set up. And it will be obstruction of justice which impeaches trump before his own indictment.

SoSpricyHotDog

I've said numerous times that it's all circumstantial... I simply provided a number of examples that were also only circumstantial to begin with - and all underwent extreme levels of suppression in attempts to cover tracks.

Yes. I see some of those Russian connections, but certainly not all of them. Stone and Assange? Really? C"mon... you're drinking the wrong Kool Aid.

Manafort? Kushner? Don Jr? Yeah. Sure. I get it. But I want to see what they actually did/conspired to do... so far it's all discussions and seemingly unrelated biz deals.

Mueller is keeping a super tight lid on his findings, acting with a level of professionalism that makes Comey look like a fucking joke that he is/was. I am hoping that he delivers concrete findings for WHOMEVER (Left or Right) is implicated and cracks the whip.

But when it comes to Assange's evidence the Russia did not hack vs. domestic leaks... and comparing this to Crowdstrike's "report"? I'll put my money on Assange.

zeroinstinct

I'm not going to waste my time presenting a thoroughly researched post with links. I'll leave that to arewesure. However if you're willing to present your evidence in support of pizzagate, then i'll take the time to explain Russian infiltration and influence of the US elections.

SoSpricyHotDog

Go for it...

BTW - the presentation of (circumstantial) evidence in support of Pizzagate is all of the high ranked posts here on Voat. To randomly hold me, individually, to a higher standard than everyone looking into this on Voat, Reddit, Chan, YouTube, etc... makes absolutely no sense.

To question why I'm here also doesn't make any sense. Because I single-handedly am unable to provide concrete evidence to prove PG, I should leave?

Your logic is sound.

zeroinstinct

I asked you to talk me through the pizzagate evidence. That's why you're here after all.

So before we start can we agree you have nothing to back up this bullshit?

SoSpricyHotDog

I never claimed I did... no one does... you think someone on here is just sitting on hard evidence and waiting around to see what happens?

You keep saying this as if I made some sort of claim that I had evidence.

Why the fuck are you here?

zeroinstinct

If that's the case then, why are you here is the pertinent question

Are_we_sure

You are still focused on the Don Jr. meeting w/ Veselsketnya? ... From the most recent intel I saw this didn't lead to much of anything. And it was already established that the meeting itself wasn't illegal.

There are several things that have come out of this meeting that have significance for a prosecutor.

For one, when you apply for a security clearance you have to list the meetings you have had with foreign nationals. Jared Kushner did not do that. This is a crime within itself

The Trump camp lied about it for several days straight, which indicates they clearly wanted to cover it up.

We then learned that the President himself was involved in these lies, aids initially wanted to release a truthful statement, but the President overruled them and took part in revising the statement and coming up with the dishonest cover story. So there is potential obstruction of justice charges if anything illegal occurred during the meeting.

We just learned the White House Counsel almost resigned recently because he was worried that Kushner and the President were meeting to coordinate stories, so the White House Counsel is afraid of possible obstruction of justice.

So what crime might have taken place? Paul Manafort took notes during that meeting and the special counsel has them. One of the notes said "active sponsors of the RNC." After this meeting Russian Americans flowed 2 million dollars to the RNC and the Trump campaign. The special counsel is looking to see if they were directed to give this money or of this money really came from foreign sources.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-dictated-sons-misleading-statement-on-meeting-with-russian-lawyer/2017/07/31/04c94f96-73ae-11e7-8f39-eeb7d3a2d304_story.html?utm_term=.d168b8757f81

http://www.businessinsider.com/don-mcgahn-almost-resigned-over-concerns-about-trump-kushner-meetings-russia-probe-2017-9

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/investigators-follow-flow-money-trump-wealthy-donors-russian/story?id=50100024

SoSpricyHotDog

Ok... I guess we'll see what Mueller's findings are. There have been so many "Strike outs" with the Russian narrative, it's hard for me to believe the seriousness of these angles until some concrete evidence is presented.

And before we get all riled up and start saying "But, wait, no, THESE ARE crimes..." let's not be quick to forget how many actual crimes were committed within the HRC/DNC email debacles that went totally unpunished.

I'm not suggesting that 2 wrongs cancel each other out. Only an observation of the hilarious unbalanced scale of justice when it comes to the Left Side (will do/say/grant immunity to anyone to avoid indictment) vs. the Right Side (will grasp at all straws possible to find ANYTHING to indict with).

If Trump or anyone on his team is found guilty of working with/accepting funding from Russian sources tied to the Kremlin - they should absolutely be held accountable. But it will be a slap in the face to the entire country if they are held over a fire and HRC/Lynch/Comey all walk away unscathed from a clearly compromised investigation... not to mention the pre-existing ties to Russia on top of that pile of nonsense that relate back to Clinton/Podesta.

2impendingdoom

that asshat must be one of Meuller's team