pizza-party-pooper

Well, now I guess there's no question as to why he's 49ht most influential in Washington.

jonnythaiwongy9

Be weary of CL ads, that 'fake new troll found dead' was creating loads of ads making it look like Hil was doing it, and when Trump supporters went for it, everyone said look they fall for fakes easily they're idiots.

srayzie

What do you mean by fake new troll found dead?

micha_

Indeed very much looks like Alefantis. But without the original source of the photo, it can't be trusted. Where is this photo from?

srayzie

I agree. A couple of people have said they’ve seen this before. I’d like to see as well. But he sure has the same features. He has a unique face. To me it looks like he put on glasses and a hat to try to disguise himself somewhat and that woman that looks like his mother is in the same picture. He looks just like her. I hope somebody has a more clear photo.

micha_

You have the pic from @fartyshorts . Where did he get it from?

srayzie

Well I was was assuming he took a snapshot of the video. It didn’t cross my mind that it could be a copy of the photo. Well since you pinged fartyshorts, hopefully we find out.

micha_

I have done some research. It's fake! I would appreciate it, if you would update your original post with that info:

The picture is original and not photoshopped: http://www.gettyimages.com/license/582627350

But the 250th Rothschild anniversary was 1994:

From ghetto to Golden Book: Steve Crawshaw was at the Rothschild family's 250th anniversary party in Frankfurt http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/from-ghetto-to-golden-book-steve-crawshaw-was-at-the-rothschild-familys-250th-anniversary-party-in-1426223.html

The man on that picture would be way too old for J. Alefantis today.

srayzie

Thanks!

micha_

I see you edited the post. Great. It would be more professional, if you would add to the topic headline: [DEBUNKED], too.

srayzie

You can’t change the headline

unbiased_researcher

Not Alefantis. Looks like him, but it's not. This man is older and appears in the other family photos.

srayzie

Can you share the other photos so that we can verify?

srayzie

Are you thinking that’s who’s in the picture? Or a relative?

cussingaintfunny

I think so. JA's possible brother or half-brother. Philippine's son.

srayzie

See the update. Maybe that’s his real father 😮

snappypickle

this makes me want to reference his brother's wedding photos again

Blacksmith21

Well, what do you know. Get ready for another attack. Shit is starting to come to the light of day. Excellent discovery. With the caveat that there isn't enough detail in the photo to convince a jury. We know what we are looking at but any defense attorney would put that down in 10 minutes.

wellendowedduckling

Why didn't they just archive the page from craigslist? Anyone can fake a jpeg that is then embedded in a video?

2impendingdoom

Sunshine85 keeps doing that. very annoying.

srayzie

What’s annoying? That I posted this video? Who is Sunshine85?

2impendingdoom

Its annoying how sunshine85 posts videos of documents instead of the actual documents and doesn't explain what the videos are of, there have been multiple occasions of him doing this. I find find videos annoying because I can read faster and my internet is slow. you are not annoying. your post made me laugh.

srayzie

I didn’t make the video by the way. I found it.

srayzie

Oh ok. I was about to go all donkeyhote on you lol

2impendingdoom

you still can, but I might not be as fun

srayzie

When I saw him using another forum, he was calling everyone cunts and stupid like he does here. I hope I didn’t offend you. I was just playing.

srayzie

I had to say that because he calls everyone here that

srayzie

Just kiiiiidding 😁

srayzie

🤣😂🤣😂😮😂😮

srayzie

CUNT!

2impendingdoom

oh JEW stupid JEW bitches JEW don't JEW know JEW how JEW to JEW shut JEW up JEW

srayzie

🤣😂😆 I wonder how long it will take The little bitch to use ALL CAPS and tell us how stupid we are hahaha.

wellendowedduckling

its not just annoying it's not useful and only stirs the pot without providing evidence

2impendingdoom

and given that Sunshine85 also posted a clip from the movie spinal tap as evidence of child abuse tunnels under stonehenge, that's very likely the intent. Sigh.

https://voat.co/v/news/2159459

NASAoperativesDC

It could be true though.

2impendingdoom

satanic tunnels could be true, but the video from Spinal Tap didn't provide any evidence or even suggestion of satanic tunnels.

NASAoperativesDC

You know Aristotle teaches us a little thing called the mark of an educated mind entertaining a thought without accepting it. Voat would do well to remember Panda Moon waits for no man.

2impendingdoom

you are so wise two hour old internet stranger. how about I entertain the idea of ignoring your next comment? besides, I highly doubt you've ever actually been taught anything by Aristotle.

NASAoperativeDC

Well he is my ancestor, so as Plato would say, I am capable of reaching the form of his knowledge, since it resides in me.

Unlike you, peasant. ;)

2impendingdoom

did equinelvr let you out of the barn today donkey?

NASAoperativeDC

Did Lost Angels Trumpet for you?

NASAoperativeDC

Yeah.

wellendowedduckling

oh dear

scoobatron

J'aime Les Enfants

Vigilia_Procuratio

Is that photo actually supposed to be real? Everybody has been superimposed onto that, it's obvious judging by the colour/lighting differences around peoples hair and coats. There are also serious discrepancies with shadows, which is even more strange given that vampires don't even cast them. The direction people are looking in suggests there are multiple cameras, or clowns dancing in the background to make them laugh... some people are looking directly into the viewer's perspective, others are looking away from it. It's fake.

Blacksmith21

I completely disagree with you. I am an expert in the field and I can tell you the shadows are completely consistent with a single point light source at 2 o'clock on the 2D photo. All chin and under shadowing are consistent. Color temperature and exposure are equally consistent throughout the image. There are no visible signs of pixel stitching or manipulation Should I go on?

Vigilia_Procuratio

I'm no expert either, but I can clearly see the child on the left is casting no shadow. The old lady's hand on the other child looks completely unnatural (but then again that girl has no hands). The woman next to her has her right shoulder slightly in front, yet she's behind the man who's slightly behind the child - that woman is also much shorter than everybody else, a foot or so shorter than a woman twice her age.

It may look like a neat photo at first, but zoomed in there are discrepancies to my eye. I'm not buying it.

NASAoperativesDC

Tell that to the Moon. Mhm.

srayzie

Vampires? Clowns? Really? 🙄 You seem brilliant.

I think it looks like there is shade from the trees on the right. People tend to smile for pictures. Have you not seen pictures taken before? People smile, there is usually more than one camera if it’s a big group of people.

I wasn’t present when the photo was taken. Nor was I there when it was possibly photoshopped. So, I guess it’s up for you all to decide. I’m just the messenger.

DeathTwoMasons

For whatever reason, I missed this the first time. Outstanding. .

Jem777

This was posted on Voat the same day the Stratfor emails were posted. I believe it could have contributed to DDOS on Voat... good job re-posting.

OhRutherfordBehave

Wait so were there new Stratfor emails? Those have been around for a long time.