The idea behind this reaction is being suggested as Huma Abedin knows what its like to have a husband thats been unfaithful. I don't understand why Chapman would ever want to compare her situation to Abedin's though.

"My husband has been sexually assaulting women at work for years." "Yes, its just like the time my husband was found guilty of possessing child porn and having a sexual interest in underage girls"

What exactly do these two have in common? I wouldn't even say Weiner is as publicly well known as Weinstein for Abedin to give Chapman advice on handling the press. This is huge. On another level to Weiner for the amount of attention Chapman is going to get now.

The only thing these two have in common is that they're all part of the same crowd of people. Weinstein, Weiner, Clinton, Obama. So I have to wonder if Chapman has gone to Abedin to pass on information, or confirm some kind of loyalty to a secret, an update on a plan on how to move forward. Because to me it stinks of something rotten.