Bill Clinton history professor caroll quigley is pretty well thought of amongst conspiracy theorists. He wrote two important history books "tragedy and hope" and " the anglo/American establishment"
Niall Ferguson is very well thought of by people who would normally dismiss conspiracy theorists. That's why his new book could be highly effective in changing perspectives. He has a very high profile in the UK, and headlines like "The Conspiracy Theorists Were Right After All" in The Telegraph this weekend will at least get the unenlightened to start scratching their heads.
Just read his Wikipedia page, interesting character. Wrote two books on the Rothschilds, a warts and all biography of Kissinger (with his blessing and input), attended Bilderberg meeting in 2012, was pro-Iraq war, formerly anti-Trump but now considers him to be the greatest hope for world peace. Hrad to know what to make of him. His wife Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a bad-ass, highly critical of Islam and its treatment of women.
One of those books is the
authorised
biography of the Rothschilds. I personally bought
The Cash Nexus
. It was well-written for the fist 60 pages but descends into incoherent rubbish after ~ the first 60 pages.
The Square and the Tower by Niall Ferguson review – a new understanding of global history? | Books | The Guardian
'The result of the Brexit referendum “was a victory for a network – and network science – over the hierarchy of the British establishment”. '
'Some of the book’s material will be familiar to readers of recent British history, such as a lively account of Cambridge’s Conversazione Society (or “Apostles”) and the university’s Soviet spies. '
'An academic journal article in 2002 noted that influential work using network science to illuminate history had been published throughout the previous decade. '
'But in his ambitious new book, The Square and the Tower, he claims that historians have paid too little attention to networks of all kinds. '
'At the start of his book, Ferguson concedes that his all-encompassing dichotomy between hierarchies and networks is an “over-simplification”, but he contends that it is a useful starting point. '
▼ european
Bill Clinton history professor caroll quigley is pretty well thought of amongst conspiracy theorists. He wrote two important history books "tragedy and hope" and " the anglo/American establishment"
▼ icuntstopswearing
Niall Ferguson is very well thought of by people who would normally dismiss conspiracy theorists. That's why his new book could be highly effective in changing perspectives. He has a very high profile in the UK, and headlines like "The Conspiracy Theorists Were Right After All" in The Telegraph this weekend will at least get the unenlightened to start scratching their heads.
▼ Mad_As_Hell
Just read his Wikipedia page, interesting character. Wrote two books on the Rothschilds, a warts and all biography of Kissinger (with his blessing and input), attended Bilderberg meeting in 2012, was pro-Iraq war, formerly anti-Trump but now considers him to be the greatest hope for world peace. Hrad to know what to make of him. His wife Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a bad-ass, highly critical of Islam and its treatment of women.
▼ MichaelCaine
Isn’t Kissinger all warts?
▼ GlobalSouth
One of those books is the authorised biography of the Rothschilds. I personally bought The Cash Nexus . It was well-written for the fist 60 pages but descends into incoherent rubbish after ~ the first 60 pages.
▼ derram
https://archive.fo/I4kz9 | https://files.catbox.moe/9e8kvv.png :
'The result of the Brexit referendum “was a victory for a network – and network science – over the hierarchy of the British establishment”. '
'Some of the book’s material will be familiar to readers of recent British history, such as a lively account of Cambridge’s Conversazione Society (or “Apostles”) and the university’s Soviet spies. '
'An academic journal article in 2002 noted that influential work using network science to illuminate history had been published throughout the previous decade. '
'But in his ambitious new book, The Square and the Tower, he claims that historians have paid too little attention to networks of all kinds. '
'At the start of his book, Ferguson concedes that his all-encompassing dichotomy between hierarchies and networks is an “over-simplification”, but he contends that it is a useful starting point. '
This has been an automated message.