LMAO if you can't imagine a dozen ways in 30 seconds that the rich use ARBITRARYILY VALURD art to hide money you have zero financial sophistication. I'm an erstwhile defender of yours, why the weak shilling faggot
Terrible. This whole process illustrates how the elites think of us. They think the population is too stupid to criticize their art and too lazy to investigate this laundering. When the news shows a talking head extolling the virtues of this art, the masses are supposed to go back to sleep.
Art has been perverted and it is how jews launder money. They stole a lot of art. They create art and then praise it as "great" when in fact it looks like something a 3 year old made. Its absurd. Absolutely zero talent.
Tracy beanz (YouTube) had an excellent video discussing that 450 million fraud. It is laundering a t it's finest. That particular piece started out as a 10k dollar reject.
Half a billion dollars. How much money does one need to have to make such a discretionary purchase? I bet Soros has the coin. I bet Soros is going to have a party and burn it or defile it somehow. Wonder if TP/JP have that type of scratch secreted somewhere.
If someone were really enterprising, they would figure out someway to ID the buyer.
Does it really make you wonder that a Leonardo da Vinci painting is the highest priced painting ever? There's only 16 existing da Vinci paintings almost all are in museums. Owning a da Vinci was pretty near impossible. The last time a da Vinci painting was verified as authentic was over a 100 years ago.
If you're a deca-billionaire who wants bragging rights about owning something truly rare, here's your chance.
In 2011, the art community reached a consensus: This was a bona fide da Vinci.
“It’s the most unimaginable discovery of the last 50 years,” London-based art dealer Charles Beddington told the New York Times. “A painting by Leonardo is one of the rarest things on the planet. You can’t imagine it’s ever going to happen again.”
Or, as Simon told CNN, “This is not a little ripple in a pond, this is like a boulder,”
The painting made its public debut at London’s National Gallery in a 2011 exhibit titled, “Leonardo da Vinci: Painter in the Court of Milan,” where it “became one of the most talked-about pictures in the world,” as the New Yorker wrote.
I wouldn't say no consensus, I would say the consensus is not universal. There does appear to be a very serious artistic and scientific attempt to validate this among several experts at the highest level. And that was done quietly.....they didn't reveal it as a Da Vinci until the experts weighed in. There's another recently discovered painting that is a disputed da Vinci
With this painting there was a historical record of it existing and being owned by the King of England and that students of da Vincis had made copies. In addition to several technical details, they found underneath the painting, is an earlier version of the placement of the hand. Something that someone copying a painting wouldn't do.
That's the problem w/ this sort of thing. "For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert." That first link is The History Channel. They're not trustworthy. Wouldn't surprise me tho if it is authentic, just seems to be a lot of controversy surrounding it.
Nan Chisholm of Antiques Road Show is the resident painting expert, I should ask her about it, I've emailed her before. She's sold one or two Norman Rockwell's, don't know how much "antiquity" expertise she has tho.
Pizzagate related because the synergy of trash 'art' at inflated prices is one of the primary ways money is laundered in the Pedocult.
Painted in 2006-08, Nurse Kathy is from one of Richard Prince’s famous series of ‘Nurse’ paintings. In these pictures, Prince presents the viewer with an image of striking and deceptive simplicity: a nurse, masked, with paint dripping down the surface, is shown alongside a title. There is a painterly quality to these images: in Nurse Kathy, the brushstrokes and the glow of colours evoke the Abstract Expressionism of Mark Rothko. Yet this is an image based in part on images manipulated by computer. In this way, Prince’s Nurse paintings manage to balance impossible extremes: they are in-your-face, direct, assaults on the senses, taking their visual impact from art, book design and advertising. Yet they are also elusive, with Prince himself presenting the viewer with a work that is a cipher, a riddle, filled with layers of meaning. Prince has combined digital imaging with gestural brushwork in order to create a work that challenges notions of authorship.
▼ DonKeydich
Case study PG art laundering: TOP COLLECTORS ARE ALL FINANCIERS AND MOVIE MOGULS I.E. JEWS INCLUDING FORMER ISRAELI SPIES, A MEANINGLESS DISTINCTION
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1952567
▼ Are_we_sure
Starting bid is actually $3 million.
24 million is is HK$ not US $
▼ DonKeydich
LMAO if you can't imagine a dozen ways in 30 seconds that the rich use ARBITRARYILY VALURD art to hide money you have zero financial sophistication. I'm an erstwhile defender of yours, why the weak shilling faggot
▼ GreenDell144
Terrible. This whole process illustrates how the elites think of us. They think the population is too stupid to criticize their art and too lazy to investigate this laundering. When the news shows a talking head extolling the virtues of this art, the masses are supposed to go back to sleep.
▼ Cheesebooger
Art has been perverted and it is how jews launder money. They stole a lot of art. They create art and then praise it as "great" when in fact it looks like something a 3 year old made. Its absurd. Absolutely zero talent.
▼ Blacksmith21
It makes one wonder why last week someone bid/won $450,300,000.00 USD for a da Vinci and more importantly who bought it?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-art-auction/da-vinci-portrait-of-christ-sells-for-record-450-3-million-in-new-york-idUSKBN1DG066
▼ Iam7777777
Tracy beanz (YouTube) had an excellent video discussing that 450 million fraud. It is laundering a t it's finest. That particular piece started out as a 10k dollar reject.
▼ MeisterYodaz
Good find. And good question! But beside that i find the painting absolute perfect. It also hints to the heart chakra... Just wow.
▼ Blacksmith21
Half a billion dollars. How much money does one need to have to make such a discretionary purchase? I bet Soros has the coin. I bet Soros is going to have a party and burn it or defile it somehow. Wonder if TP/JP have that type of scratch secreted somewhere.
If someone were really enterprising, they would figure out someway to ID the buyer.
▼ Are_we_sure
Does it really make you wonder that a Leonardo da Vinci painting is the highest priced painting ever? There's only 16 existing da Vinci paintings almost all are in museums. Owning a da Vinci was pretty near impossible. The last time a da Vinci painting was verified as authentic was over a 100 years ago.
If you're a deca-billionaire who wants bragging rights about owning something truly rare, here's your chance.
▼ Blacksmith21
I agree it could be just that. The timing is odd.
▼ bopper
There's no consensus that this da Vinci painting is authentic.
▼ Are_we_sure
I wouldn't say no consensus, I would say the consensus is not universal. There does appear to be a very serious artistic and scientific attempt to validate this among several experts at the highest level. And that was done quietly.....they didn't reveal it as a Da Vinci until the experts weighed in. There's another recently discovered painting that is a disputed da Vinci
Here's some background.
http://www.history.com/news/how-a-priceless-da-vinci-masterwork-disappeared-from-view-for-centuries
Here's one expert, saying it struck him as authentic immediately
http://www.blouinartinfo.com/news/story/750715/the-male-mona-lisa-art-historian-martin-kemp-on-leonardo-da-vincis-mysterious-salvator-mundi
With this painting there was a historical record of it existing and being owned by the King of England and that students of da Vincis had made copies. In addition to several technical details, they found underneath the painting, is an earlier version of the placement of the hand. Something that someone copying a painting wouldn't do.
▼ bopper
That's the problem w/ this sort of thing. "For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert." That first link is The History Channel. They're not trustworthy. Wouldn't surprise me tho if it is authentic, just seems to be a lot of controversy surrounding it.
Nan Chisholm of Antiques Road Show is the resident painting expert, I should ask her about it, I've emailed her before. She's sold one or two Norman Rockwell's, don't know how much "antiquity" expertise she has tho.
▼ think-
Not sure what to make of this - sorry to ask, but what is the proof this specific painting is used to launder money?
Because of the artist's affiliation to the Gagosian Gallery? Or the high starting bid?
▼ Oh_Well_ian
connection to PG is in the comments, new guy who thinks he's a mod...
▼ think-
Nope. I honestly don't get it.
▼ Eggs-Vs-Bacon
What a piece of shit! Screams money-laundering. Sick fucks.
▼ Dressage2
I’m with you! How many kids sold equal the value of that painting? That is the reality of that type of artwork.
▼ Oh_Well_ian
Pizzagate related because the synergy of trash 'art' at inflated prices is one of the primary ways money is laundered in the Pedocult.
Painted in 2006-08, Nurse Kathy is from one of Richard Prince’s famous series of ‘Nurse’ paintings. In these pictures, Prince presents the viewer with an image of striking and deceptive simplicity: a nurse, masked, with paint dripping down the surface, is shown alongside a title. There is a painterly quality to these images: in Nurse Kathy, the brushstrokes and the glow of colours evoke the Abstract Expressionism of Mark Rothko. Yet this is an image based in part on images manipulated by computer. In this way, Prince’s Nurse paintings manage to balance impossible extremes: they are in-your-face, direct, assaults on the senses, taking their visual impact from art, book design and advertising. Yet they are also elusive, with Prince himself presenting the viewer with a work that is a cipher, a riddle, filled with layers of meaning. Prince has combined digital imaging with gestural brushwork in order to create a work that challenges notions of authorship.