This is a great example of the revisionist history of pizzagate that a lot of folks on this board engage in. This video completely and totally undercuts the claim that the media were the ones who defined pizzagate as that a child sex ring was being run out of Comet Ping Pong. It was not the mainstream media that defined it this way, it was pizzagaters and that was they definition they used from the very beginning. The media accurately reported what pizzagaters were saying.
In defining pizzagate it clearly says If you go to wikileaks and:
"look up Podesta and Comet, this is what you'll get and
it's about a pedophile ring being run out of pizzzashops.
mischaracterized pizaagte using the MSM definition (a Hillary led sex ring run out of Comets basement)
....
The main strategy of the enemy has been to try to define pizzagate as something that it's not: "a pedo ring is run out of the basement of Comet Ping Pong". Of course no one ever claimed this except them,
The video is also a treasure trove of debunked pizzagate "facts." Showing the fake code list and the photoshopped handkerchief code.
The Mafia used to run money laundering operations out of Pizza Shops. If mass money laundering could be done through restaurants, why not other illegal activities? Again, please kill yourself. You are of no use to anyone.
How does this feel like a valid response to what I wrote?
I'm not talking in hypotheticals. I am talking in specifics. Let me break it down for you.
Claim: Pizzagaters never used this definition, that was the media:
My Claim: Pizzagaters did use this definition. The media accurately reported on what the pizzagaters were saying.
My Proof:
This video
A comment from Voat
3 Another comment on Voat.
Are you familiar with the term non sequitur? Your response to me is a non sequitur. You are speculating about something that might be possible. The original claim was about something that is actually happening. It's basically a factual claim that be proven true or false. Your response of what is possible doesn't apply at all.
▼ Jan1998
Video-Franklin Savings And Loan and Republican up-and-comer president: Larry King. Pimp Larry King
known for taking the boys to Washington DC...He also hosted parties in Omaha Nebraska.
https://voat.co/v/videos/2243747
▼ Jan1998
Telling. Johnny Depp On David Letterman:
https://voat.co/v/MartinTimothy/21120
▼ Jan1998
Look what The New York Times published December 18, 1988:
https://archive.is/jw4af
▼ 3141592653
Good one
▼ Jan1998
Required Reading:
https://voat.co/v/Pizzagate/1474448
OP @Blacksmith21
▼ Are_we_sure
Pizzagate defined by Pizzagaters as a pedophile ring run out of pizzeria.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=186&v=D8YdSvyp89E
This is a great example of the revisionist history of pizzagate that a lot of folks on this board engage in. This video completely and totally undercuts the claim that the media were the ones who defined pizzagate as that a child sex ring was being run out of Comet Ping Pong. It was not the mainstream media that defined it this way, it was pizzagaters and that was they definition they used from the very beginning. The media accurately reported what pizzagaters were saying.
In defining pizzagate it clearly says If you go to wikileaks and:
"look up Podesta and Comet, this is what you'll get and it's about a pedophile ring being run out of pizzzashops.
https://youtu.be/D8YdSvyp89E?t=166
Examples of the revisionist history from VOAT.
....
The video is also a treasure trove of debunked pizzagate "facts." Showing the fake code list and the photoshopped handkerchief code.
▼ PedoStomper
The Mafia used to run money laundering operations out of Pizza Shops. If mass money laundering could be done through restaurants, why not other illegal activities? Again, please kill yourself. You are of no use to anyone.
▼ Are_we_sure
How does this feel like a valid response to what I wrote?
I'm not talking in hypotheticals. I am talking in specifics. Let me break it down for you.
Claim: Pizzagaters never used this definition, that was the media:
My Claim: Pizzagaters did use this definition. The media accurately reported on what the pizzagaters were saying.
My Proof:
Are you familiar with the term non sequitur? Your response to me is a non sequitur. You are speculating about something that might be possible. The original claim was about something that is actually happening. It's basically a factual claim that be proven true or false. Your response of what is possible doesn't apply at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)
▼ 11297871?
Your big words won't mean a thing when your teeth are smashed out with a baseball bat.
▼ 11298000?
Balderdash!
Poppycock!
You threaten a gentleman! What temertiy, what gall!
You Hooligan, you ruffian, you're nothing but an egregious yardbird!