Narcissism

The Lolita logo on the DvD/ Blu Ray uses a near identical type face/ colour to the Virgin company - owned by Sir Richard Branson.

Pipebomb

And for those that who weren't aware the movie opens with a game of Ping-Pong.

carmencita

Right. And with the addition of the Pedo Logo (featured on the FBI's own site) that Speaks Volumes. Does anyone know if that was the First Marketing of their Pedo Logos and Pedo Messaging in Movies. Was the Ping Pong playing featured before this movie?

GeorgeHodelDidit

The author Nabakov was a victim of pedophilia...his uncle put his penis in his butt for years...Nabakov hated Freud and his famous children false memory crap. Nabakov felt it was bullshit designed to cover up raping kids and he was right. Almost everything Nabakov ever wrote was about pedophiles. He was trying to tell us what was up many years ago. He seemed to know from seeing Shirley Temple movies that they were not very well covered Pedophile friendly films....he shared a birthday with Shirley and made a book putting in lots of secrets about Shirley Temple.

Nabakov knew no one would report his complaints of Pedophilia seriously so he put in lots of secret meanings in his work and you would not be able to understand unless you were smart as hell and you read EVERYTHING he ever wrote. If you did all that you would have to believe he really put clues even in his very first published stories. Guy was driven to expose Pedophiles.

belsenwasagas

Freud and his famous children false memory crap

Freud did change his mind about that.

3141592653

I thought it was the opposite. He supported abuse victims, then he did a 180 on it later in his career

belsenwasagas

When patients started describing incest and childhood sexual abuse it was so anathema to Victorian era assumptions that even Freud couldn't believe what he was hearing and assumed they where describing repressed fantasies. A position he did later reverse.

3141592653

I'm pretty sure he supported people disclosing childhood sexual abuse, but that he did a 180 / betrayal as his career progressed, saying abuse victims were hysterical and/or making it all up. Could be that we both are correct.

orange_utang

Wouldn't be surprised if this was the original origin of the symbol

Are_we__sure

I don't see it at all. Are referring to the glasses?

Random101

The little heart is transparent, the big heart is the frame.

Are_we__sure

Interesting, but, seems like a reach.

It's like saying if you drew black heart on white sheet of paper you made two hearts, one white one black.

but you only drew one heart and I think that most folks would agree on that.

Random101

The difference is that in your example there is only one visual edge, i.e. between black and white, but in the Lolita image there are two edges: one between the clear outer visuals and the frame and the other between the frame and the facial areas which are partially obscured by the lens. This difference is emphasized by the thickness of the frame, which appears more like a flat surface than an enclosing line.

Are_we__sure

That's just depth. I could draw a heart on a piece of paper in a way that gives some depth to it.

I'm not seeing it

Random101

It's more than depth, the frame has its own shape and texture.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon

There it is, never noticed. That's crazy - it's right there!

Side note, Bill Clinton's uranium-mining buddy Frank Giustra (his connection to the Uranium One scandal could fill a book) - founder of the Elpida charity with the pedo logo - founded Lionsgate Films and one of the first movies they produced/distributed was the 1997 remake of... Lolita.