THIS should be interesting. I have been waiting for the appearance of a ‘megashill’. Imagine what it would mean if a pedo could actually counter an accusation successfully. What if they could claim defamation or libel and win? It would be a black eye in the quest for truth. Are the elites rich and powerful enough to get a journalist to make a completely false and easily refutable accusation? Is it too dangerous for them to risk more exposure by trying such a strategy? Maybe they would try it but f they are desperate enough. To most of us, Polanski has always been a reprehensible figure. I could never understand why other iconic people would defend him, but they do. He might be the guy from their side to try and pull this tactic off, because he feels comfortably supported.
I am just wondering if Uziel made his own archive of his articles, made copies and deposited them around here and there? That is what I would do. If brought to court by a lawyer, it would be evidence of collusion with said pedophile and Arianna Huffington, or AOL board depending on when the decision to scrub the article origin dated. Maybe the Idea is to drain his not so deep pockets because he is on a list of troublemakers for the empire? Uziel, if you got something send copies to every agency in the world and keep the original away from burning or exploded houses.
What I don't understand is, if the story is gone, what can he sue over? If it is gone, it never existed, right? Hmm. Sorry, Roman. It was just a figment of your imagination. Hope some people archived it.
All that's left of Uziel's article, "Explained: Why Do We Refuse To Believe That World Leaders Engage In Sadistic Child Abuse?", is that dead link in the reference. Really wanted to read it. All other articles are available, and in chronological order, so that was his last one - published the earliest in December 2016 but probably in 2017.
▼ GreenDell144
THIS should be interesting. I have been waiting for the appearance of a ‘megashill’. Imagine what it would mean if a pedo could actually counter an accusation successfully. What if they could claim defamation or libel and win? It would be a black eye in the quest for truth. Are the elites rich and powerful enough to get a journalist to make a completely false and easily refutable accusation? Is it too dangerous for them to risk more exposure by trying such a strategy? Maybe they would try it but f they are desperate enough. To most of us, Polanski has always been a reprehensible figure. I could never understand why other iconic people would defend him, but they do. He might be the guy from their side to try and pull this tactic off, because he feels comfortably supported.
▼ QuestionEverything
He actually can't sue.. But thats a good cover story. I'm sure threats were made. Polanski is dying in jail if he ever comes back to America.
Where's the source discussing legal?
▼ JrSlimss
Ah sorry - here's the Jerusalem Post article: http://archive.is/Z5gAD
And here was Uziel's original tweet about it: http://archive.is/iRaM7
▼ YogSoggoth
I am just wondering if Uziel made his own archive of his articles, made copies and deposited them around here and there? That is what I would do. If brought to court by a lawyer, it would be evidence of collusion with said pedophile and Arianna Huffington, or AOL board depending on when the decision to scrub the article origin dated. Maybe the Idea is to drain his not so deep pockets because he is on a list of troublemakers for the empire? Uziel, if you got something send copies to every agency in the world and keep the original away from burning or exploded houses.
▼ Piscina
Wow, Huff Post killed that story in a hurry. Good find.
▼ carmencita
What I don't understand is, if the story is gone, what can he sue over? If it is gone, it never existed, right? Hmm. Sorry, Roman. It was just a figment of your imagination. Hope some people archived it.
▼ Vindicator
Hey! Good to see you around!
▼ JrSlimss
Haha well, who can ignore all these new leads?
▼ JrSlimss
All that's left of Uziel's article, "Explained: Why Do We Refuse To Believe That World Leaders Engage In Sadistic Child Abuse?", is that dead link in the reference. Really wanted to read it. All other articles are available, and in chronological order, so that was his last one - published the earliest in December 2016 but probably in 2017.
▼ paulieweb
archive.is claims a copy from 6 months ago (still blank, but speaks to the age): http://archive.is/HMVBr