msgtw123

Very mixed on this one, as it is relevant and you can tell a lot of work was done on it. But it is not the bombshell that was promised. I wish it had not been pre-hyped like it was. I was waiting for most of the day to see what the amazing news was, and expected a lot more. For me, the more damaging stuff came from Singer's friend, with the mention of Singer's love of boys and sex tourism (which probably means third world countries and young boys). Singer may be relieved there is nothing more.

migratorypatterns

Agree. When it was finally published and I read it, I was disappointed because of the hype. It just isn't what it was claimed to be.

There's tons more to be told. We know that. It's what we're all waiting to hear. This is what it is. It gives a hint at what's going on but nothing more.

darkknight111

So the promise was merely a little late. Still, this is important.

migratorypatterns

It is very important and that's why I posted it. But it's nothing like what they described. But then again, it might be that shocking if you haven't been redpilled.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon

I'm afraid this guy might have a legal issue, the reporter mentions listening to some recordings. "California's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation."

migratorypatterns

But we don't know the circumstances or even where it was recorded. They could have been out, or skyping, or because he was being coached there could have been an understanding that he'd record the conversation to remember what to do.

But theoretically? Yes, he may well have a problem.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon

I'm sure a bunch of rich lawyers are all over that story already, right?

migratorypatterns

Where Singer and the cabal are involved? No doubt.

My advice is to leave this one alone. Compared to other stuff published, he got off easy.

Matt_Helm

The teen was 17 or 18 and that's legal age of consent. The cover up is in effect and Singer is being hung out to dry to keep the heat off of David Geffen and his pals who are the hardcore pedophiles in Hollywood.

AgainstPedos

Issue is for years and years fake ID's were the norm in Hollywood. Even then Bryan Singer's staff were lax about checking if guests were of age. Police never intervene in private parties among the elite. How else would Drew Barrymore and lesser known talent be able to go to mansion events and nightclubs, drinking and partying, when they're actually still young kids?

The expose of Bryan Singer is really about how huge numbers of underage and legal teens recruited, given illegal drugs, passed around countless times, all while being led to believe they'd get acting gigs as a result of their willing participation. Liberals in the industry say that Singer has crossed the line many, many times. For example no one is allowed to wear any type of swimsuit in the pool or jacuzzi. Also there's a lot of pressure, and some say outright rape, when joining the line for the bathroom.

migratorypatterns

I agree with what you say. Seems they went out of their way to talk about the 18 and older crowd. Really? What about those twink parties?

On the plus side, there is a name attached to the story and there is an alleged rape. And I don't want anyone making things up so if that's all this person knew, then it was right for him to stick with the truth. I think it's the hype the story was given. I felt it was important to post because it had been advertised, but this was not at all what I was expecting. There's still that sick side that needs to come out and be revealed. As I said, if this person wasn't involved in the more salacious acts, then he was correct in only telling what he knew. But there's somebody out there with a story to tell far beyond this one. That's what I'm waiting to hear.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon

If this guy was an adult, he's not mentioning the underage guys at the sex parties because it implicates himself.

migratorypatterns

Yes, I thought of that. But someone else could and then he'd have to explain why he omitted it.

Tangled web.

Besides, many, many people have mentioned the twink parties without any harm coming to them.

AgainstPedos

That's because they've been going on for so long and no one has ever tried to intervene. Consider the huge number of young males that have been to a Bryan Singer party. It's comparable to copious amounts of coke on movie sets back in the 80's. No one ever bothered to try and hide it. Why should they?

migratorypatterns

Why would anyone interfere with star whackers around.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon

Don't take this the wrong way guys, no reflection on your hard work, but the more public and visible voices among us - the AnOpenSecret twitter account for one - need to stop and think before they make big promises of earth-shattering bombshells. It doesn't serve any purpose, it only riles people up.

This story, while disgusting, features a consensual relationship with Singer so it's anti-climactic, and I say that even though I see how damaging it is to our cause to call a story like this anti-climactic. AnOpenSecret people - more straightforwardness and less emotion please. We want credibility not hysteria.

HOWEVER seems like a chunk of the story with Grasham is missing. It doesn't mention if he's legally accusing Grasham of rape, is he? It seems he described a rape, but then the story cuts to promoting a novel. I don't understand the decisions made by the journalist in presenting this story as it is.

Weightstone

its called steering the narrative.. Singer gets it leaked about consenting adults story, makes it look like 'yeah im the gay who loves to fuck as much as i can' being his only negative quality.. basically what Spacey tried to do, except spacey's attempt blew up in his face because it was just dumb.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon

Makes sense. In this context, this dude is actually shilling and spinning for Singer, that it was all consensual and it was some other guy who raped him.

migratorypatterns

I totally agree with you. I'm not sure if it was marketed for people who haven't been redpilled. I mean, most people think of Bryan Singer as a very legit director. But even having said that, no, we don't need that type of hype.

I felt it should be posted because there is a name attached to this story. And there very definitely is an alleged rape. So that makes it more than valid, but this was not at all what I was expecting. I totally get what you're saying and agree.

Eggs-Vs-Bacon

I'm glad you posted it, I was glad to find out what the story was. We're on the same page, TBH it's the same issue I have with Liz Crokin. The best of us get hyped sometimes, especially when we make new connections and discuss fresh information etc, but a constant tone of exclamation points end emojis doesn't reflect the seriousness of the topic. IMO. All good, mate, keep up the good fight.

migratorypatterns

Will do.

DomKeyhote

Yeah thanks for ruining my lunch with a non-underage case of kikefaggotry, 'preciate it

ASolo

Thanks for this MP, I appreciate your tenacity and determination.

migratorypatterns

Thanks.

I was waiting all day for this and happened to see it when I went on Twitter.

derram

https://archive.fo/UMt0X :

Bryan Singer’s Teen Ex-Lover Reveals Life In Director’s Orbit | Deadline

This has been an automated message.