I would take it much further, and suggest that any time you have these figures like Epstein that play major roles in the bigger corrupt power structure, it should be assumed by default that legal proceedings against them will be controlled, and that people will have their hands tied at all levels in those proceedings. We all know that the supposed official impartiality of judicial process isn't a reality-- so why can we pretend to take it for granted that Acosta would have been throwing the book at Epstein? And then in turn use that to push the anti-Trump agenda, which we all know is identical to the pro-pedo agenda ? There is no way he could have been. If he decided to fight the power, he would have lost, and died. So enough of this game shills play. We know we are dealing with the most powerful people in the world, we know that good and bad people at every level are all stuck within the evil system the top elites control. So ANY argument based on phony mainstream assumptions we know are false, like in this thread, should be ruled out, IMO.

But it doesn't. And pushing that belief as if there can only be one conclusion drawn here does not seem to me the most natural thing for people that sincerely want to see real change would be doing. It seems more like demoralizing blackpilling.