Votescam

Won't be able to watch the full interview until tomorrow ... But I thought the preview was very difficult for Dylan who is probably still feeling the suffering of her time with Woody Allen which began before she was 7 years old. In many ways, she was being abused by Woody Allen before she was 7 years old and penetrated digitally.

Woody Allen's lawyers immediately made clear he and they understood immediately that this was causing "a hit" on his movies. This is about money in large part for him and prestige.

I also find the idea that Mia reacted as a "spurned" lover when she saw the naked and pornographic photos of Soon Yi which Woody Allen left out for her to see.

Mia reacted as a Mother concerned for her daughter appearing in naked and pornographic pictures taken by a man she was in a relationship with.

MORE CONVINCING, however, is the likelihood that it was Woody who was acting out his anger with Mia as he was beginning to realize that the son he thought he had with Mia Farrow was actually the child of Frank Sinatra. If you haven't seen Ronan Farrow -- take a look -- you are looking into the face of Frank Sinatra.

DeathToMasonsASAP

Does she look like she is....performing? Watch again. Maybe she is just awkward, but her body language and mannerisms were exaggerated.

group_one

the Farrows were given rooms on a base with limited space per podesta emails

Here4pg

Woody Allen is married to his step daughter, that's all I need to know. What sort of sick society even lets that happen? This insanity has been accepted by many just as rapist Catholic priests have been accepted by many. Of course I believe you Dylan Farrow.

Random101

Woody Allen is married to his step daughter

More accurately he married the adoptive daughter of his ex-partner. There wasn't a father-daughter relationship between them that could be the basis of anything like incest.

Votescam

Actually, he was seen in the Farrow household as a step-father and he had exposure and access to Soon Yi immediately upon the beginning of his relationship with Mia Farrow and the beginning of his visits to Mia's apartment. Originally, Moses had commented that he had observed Woody making overtures to Soon Yi which could only be called "grooming."
Originally, Moses also refused visiting rights with Woody Allen and the Court refused to force him to accept visits with Woody.

The Court -- Justice Wilk -- also made clear the earned distrust of Woody Allen in the family as having tried to turn one member of the family against the other.

Much later, we see Moses support Woody Allen ... but there are many questions as to what happened in between that time which may have had to do with money.

Random101

He wasn't a step-father, a step father is a husband.

Votescam

Woody was seen as part of the family, very involved with the children. Taking them on European vacations. Spending time at Mia Farrow's homes.

Woody had also adopted Dylan, Moses and Satchel ... in fact he was believed at one time to be Satchel's biological father.

He was a father figure to the children. And since he had a 12 YEAR romantic relationship with Mia as her lover, he was aware of Soon Yi long before she was 16.

Soon Yi was adopted by Previn ... Mia's ex-husband ... but she lived in a household where the current "uncle" or "Step-father" or "lover of her Mother's" was Woody Allen.

GreenDell144

Thank you for clearing that up. I have been commenting without full knowledge.

Here4pg

He helped raise her....he was her father. I've seen pics of them together with her on his knee, as a kid.

Random101

Friends and relatives can often help raise a child but a father - daugter relationship is more than that, at least in functional family. Allen does look dodgy, especially with Dylan's testimony, but saying that he married his step-daughter doesn't fairly reflect the facts.

pixiesbitch

He helped raise that child from when she was a small infant. Ergo he is her step father. At the very least he was a strong father figure. But he decides he wants to start a sexual relationship with her. As Donald Trump would say WRONG!

Random101

No, a step father is a husband. According to Soon Yi he wasn't a a strong father figure.

pixiesbitch

She would say that though wouldn't she? This is a child who has been brainwashed from a young age to believe being married to her father is "right" and because of people like you accepting it instead ofbeing disgusted, the idea is "normalised" well its not, put in it whatever terms you want to make yourself feel comfortable but the fact is this is wrong

Random101

If it was true then she would say that. Being married to your father is incestuous, you are wrong to say that I accept it.

pixiesbitch

I just find it weird how you’re arguing with myself and others about whether he was a stepfather/father figure or not. I would say he was a father figure at the least. So would majority. So in my eyes that’s weird. But whatever

Here4pg

Any ideas why he would adopt the other two kids and not Soon Yi? I realized that yesterday while writing a response to Carmencita from Wikipedia on here. He adopted the other kids but not her. @random101

pixiesbitch

Probably so he knew he could get away with marrying her, or to use the same argument that random101 puts forward, that he’s not her real father or even a father figure because she’s not his adopted daughter. It was, I bet, a very well thought out plan, one that would require years of brainwashing and grooming. It obviously has worked, especially when the commenter above seems to think it’s normal

Here4pg

Sick. I remember hearing about their relationship and thinking it was a bit creepy but I had NO idea he helped raise her and was the dad. They don't want people to know that.

Looks like he is a pro-pedophilia, I just tested him and it came back positive.

pixiesbitch

Hahahah. Good one

Yeah there are all sorts of pedo sympathisers around here. Majority of people hate pedos so they’re on their own.

Here4pg

Yeah, he came off as wanting to know the truth but when presented to him, he opted to take the definition that would support a justification of pedophilia on Allen's part.

I just realized that this Woody Allen case is fucking huge. The connections are crazy.

pixiesbitch

Yea the connections are huge with these Hollywood types. Look at Roman Polanski, the theories even go so far as to say he knew his wife would be killed - the baby was a sacrifice. You can go far down the rabbit hole of Hollywood and connect everyone I’m sure. The entirety of Hollywood is a satanic cult which needs to be brought to light.

Here4pg

How do you think he knew?

I've seen evidence to suggest she is alive and it was a CIA operation.

Here4pg

Yeah but he was dating her mom....if he lived with her he is common law = step-dad.

Random101

A common law marriage is not the same as a de facto marriage. Common law involves a lawful union of a man and a woman, there's an exchange of vows etc.

Here4pg

Not at all, it is a living arrangement.

Random101

No, that's de facto, not a de jure marriage.

Common-law marriage. One not solemnized in the or­dinary way (i.e. non-ceremonial) but created by an agreement to marry, followed by cohabitation. (Black's dictionary of law, 5the edition)

Here4pg

Common Law Marriages

You are considered legally married -- despite not having a marriage license, a ceremony, or a marriage certificate -

from a law site: http://family.findlaw.com/marriage/common-law-marriages.html

Random101

That article is utter bullshit. Common law is not subject to the dictates of the state, the only way that real legislation can negate it is by identifying a a remedy for a mischief, eg a statute to prohibit illicit marriages, eg those involving incest.

Here4pg

I know common law couples...but believe whatever you want, I don't care.

Random101

There's lots of wikipedia-style bullshit about the common law out there. If you believe what the state told you about it you've probably been misinformed.

Here4pg

No I know actually people that are living common law. They would know :)

Random101

How is that any different to hearsay?

Here4pg

because they know how they are treated in terms of taxes etc. No reason to lie.

Random101

Getting screwed over via taxes doesn't mean that they understand the common law. I'm not suggesting that they're lying, only that there's no reason to believe that they know what they're talking about.

Here4pg

As I said think what you want, I don't really give a shit. I know several people that are common law, same story. I've proven it through a law website and personal experiences. I'm not wasting anymore time.

Random101

What matters is the truth. If you think that you can prove it then post the link to your website, unless of course you don't want to risk being shown to be wrong.

Here4pg

common-law marriage Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia. Common-Law Marriage

A union of two people not formalized in the customary manner as prescribed by law but created by an agreement to marry followed by Cohabitation.

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/common-law+marriage

What is Common Law Marriage

Common law marriage is a marriage that results from the actions of a couple, independent of the state. That is, a couple that fulfills the requirements to establish a common law marriage becomes legally married even though they have not obtained a marriage license or fulfilled the requirements of a state's statutory marriage laws, and have not had a marriage ceremony. Under common law requirements, that typically involves a relationship in which: 

Cohabitation - The couple lives together as a married couple,

Mutual Agreement - The couple agrees that they are married, and

Cohabitation - The partners hold themselves out to the world as a married couple.

https://www.expertlaw.com/library/family_law/common_law.html

There you go, Im not doing anymore work for you, sorry.

Random101

So you've changed from your previous position of "it is a living arrangement" (i.e a de facto relationship) to "an agreement to marry followed by Cohabitation", right?

Technically common law marriage isn't necessarily legal, as there may be no tangible record of the marriage, but it is lawful.

Here4pg

I put varying definitions in there to show you there are different ways of interpreting it and also to test you out. Did you read the second one or are you really here for truth? I think it's looking like you are pro-pedophile right now.

Random101

Fuck off, idiot.

Here4pg

I already linked a law site. How many more do you need? I'll find them.

pixiesbitch

why are you so adamant about this? seems a bit...noncey....

Random101

I'm adamant about it because I've been studying the common law and it's history for years. There's a lot of wikipedia-style bullshit out there about common law. The incest angle is related to Christianity's ideas about Adam & Eve. It's a long story.

pixiesbitch

There’s the “common law” and there’s also the morality side of things. And morally, it feels off. Like I said tho use whichever argument you want to feel better about the situation but marrying your adopted daughter is wrong.

Here4pg

It's absolutely sick, She WAS his daughter, I don't care what you call it, that's what she is.

Random101

Common law goes to the heart of ethics. Also, Woody Allen didn't marry his adopted daugter, he married Mia Farrow's adopted daughter.

Here4pg

Either they covered up that she was adopted or he planned to marry her when she was a kid. There is no other explanation why he adopted the other kids not her. ITS SICK!!!

Random101

What other kids did Woody Allen adopt?

Here4pg

Dylan and Moses

madazzahattereboot

"What I don't understand is how is this crazy story of me being brainwashed and coached more believable than what I'm saying about being sexually assaulted by my father." - Dylan Farrow

Ohhhhh, I think we all know the answer to your question, Dylan.

It's Woody Allen! He's one of the elite!!!

gaystapo

Yeah, shocking that that explanation was accepted.