dragonkiller

@letsdothis1

OP here the instructions for a fast repost so that you don't have to spend an hour on the markup language. @kevdude just gave you a shortcut.

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2364797/11764626

letsdothis1

Thanks for the input by the way. I seem to have hit a nerve. Interesting.

dragonkiller

Please point out examples. The current bans are for repeat rulebreakers and spammers. If there is someone who was banned outside of this please, by all means, let me know the username.

@2impendingdoom was the most blatant case I remember right now. All that poster said was "there are some good threads in the deleted threads area" and boom, got banned. Much hell was raised about and Falcon finally had to relent. There have been others but I think this Christ Church situation might have just gotten straight with your help. Since I am not here to raise hell and argue I would rather just drop the banning subject. All I wanted to do was defend a relevant topic. I just pinged the OP and pointed to your helpful advice and hopefully its problem solved now.

Thanks for your help dude :)

dragonkiller

They literally need to go into the modlog and bbring this up, hit "source" copy/paste into a new post, add the piece you just posted, and boom, they check the boxes and we have a quality submission to the sub.


Already told you that I am not the OP's alt username even though you might think otherwise. I am simply very familiar with the Hampstead children and I know it is legit.


@letsdothis1 since i'm not your alt I cannot complete the request of @kevdude but I think @kevude just gave you the keys to the car.


@kevdude is saying what you need is in this comment I made.

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2364797/11764419

letsdothis1

10-4.

dragonkiller

I can't see a pizzagate connection. I really can't.

These two children gave the most bone chilling testimony of being ritually abused and sexually molested in pizzagate history. The two little blonde kids. You will remember their faces instantly probably. Its the Hampstead children. World famous case. Its so relevant he didn't bother with Rule 1.


https://deusnexus.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/hampstead_children.jpg


Hampstead Christ Church Satanic Ritual Child Abuse...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtAuWQHgUvo



Hampstead Christ Church Satanic Ritual Child Abuse...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSJI_qfI-es


No, but it says in the rules that if a post is incomplete he is required to pull it.

OP brought a couple of new names. Spelled out EXACTLY why he thought they were connected to the case. OP was not lacking in spelling out why he wants the new names he brought to the table investigated.

dragonkiller

Fair enough. Who were you previously?

Not going to say because Falcon has a history of banning members for simply having an opinion he does not like. I don't what he thought of my last username but with his history of banning people that say things he does not like, I figure the less he knows about me the better. Not trying to pull a fast one, that is just how I feel.

Now that I stuck up for this post I will have to create a new name probably because he will most likely target me. I am being straight up in my defense of the Christ Church topic and that is really all that matters.

I don't want to be the subject because I am not relevant. The rules are relevant and Falcon just exceeded his mandate.

dragonkiller

@letsdothis1

I am pinging you to let you know that Falcon has a history of deleting posts on this topic and to let you know I am questioning it. The post met the rules. You have to stand your ground on Christ Church or he will censor it.

letsdothis1

Thanks. I saw your comments to him. I'm digging a little further before I respond to him and repost. I ALWAYS stand my ground. :-)

dragonkiller

Thanks. I saw some of your comments to him. I'm digging a little further before I respond to him and repost. I ALWAYS stand my ground. :-)

Falcon knows who Tavistock is. Everybody in the whole truth community knows who Tavistock is. It does not matter if he knows or not. You brought names that were new to you to a valid case in the pizzagate world and he is hindering. That is all that matters. Its not his job to speculate if the dots will connect or not. His job is to allow research within the rules.


We have investigated Hillary hundreds, maybe thousands of times, and found new info regularly. Same standards should apply to Christ Church and other relevant topics.


dragonkiller

I really would be interested in following the lines that you may see connecting this to PG, so I need you, as OP, to spell that out.

I am not the OP. I am a community member. The post met the rules. It obviously did. Why is Falcon allowed to sift through all the details, as if he did the research, and nit pick the data and be the judge. That is what the community is here for. A research community. The post meets the rules. He is breaking the barrier as a mod. This is obvious. Why is this allowed. He has done this on Christ Church before. This might be the hottest and most famous case in pizzagate history and he squelches it. It does not say in the rules that he has the right to do that.

dragonkiller

I am not a mod of the sub, but you thought to ping me, why?

I have been reading this sub daily for about a year. For several months I was a daily poster. I had to go back to work and stopped posting for a while and forgot my password. I recently joined again. I have seen you settle disputes before. I'm not sure what your role is. I know you are not a mod. But I have seen you settle disputes before. So, I pinged you too.

dragonkiller

INB4 the personal attacks start:

"dragonkiller is just an asshole." Yes I am an asshole. Glad we got that out of the way.

Posts are to be judged by if they met the rules, not if dragonkiller is an asshole. You don't get to be the judge detective Falcon. The post met the rules. And its Christ Church. It is relevant. We know that because you didn't cite Rule 1 but its obviously relevant.

@kevdude @vindicator @Millennial_Falcon

Millennial_Falcon

Your post broke some rules. Why not simply fix the problems? Are you just trying to stir up dissent?

dragonkiller

@Millennial_Falcon

Christ Church is so relevant that not even you can dispute it. Where does it say in the rules that you have the right to stop the research community from investigating new information. You don't know where it might lead and you already admit that you do not know. Why are you stopping people from investigating new information? Not your job. That is a direct question and I want you to answer it. I just checked the rules again and your name as lead investigator is not in the rules. You don't get to decide which dots can be researched and which ones cannot in a relevant subject when the post meets the rules.

@kevdude @vindicator

dragonkiller

I did not post it. I just remember you censoring this topic in the past. I like this topic because its the best case pizzagate has, or so a lot of people think. You did not do the research, you just stopped others from doing it. Not your job. The post met the rules. Research is what we are here for. If the post meets the rules you are not allowed to stop people from trying to connect the dots on new information. That is our job. This is new data in a relevant case. OP wants it investigated. You are hindering.

dragonkiller

Obvious gate keeper deletes YET ANOTHER post about Christ Church. @Millennial_Falcon has deleted posts about this before. This post is obviously relevant and has met the specifications of the rules. Instead of letting the community discuss the details and decide what the interpretation of the data is Falcon has stepped in as judge and jury and interpreted the data for the whole community. This is not your job Falcon, this is what the community does. You have done this on Christ Church posts before.

@kevdude @vindicator

Millennial_Falcon

Rule 2: How do we know that @AaronDover is the actual Aaron Dover, not a disinfo shill? (And we have reason to suspect this because the real Aaron Dover was apparently a flat-Earther. Apparently there was considerable suspicion in the original thread posted on Voat that it was disinfo). If we have no proof it's him, that's fine; just be clear. (From the date of the post being so close to the date of his death, it's hard to tell whether it was posted before Aaron Dover's death or after.)

Aaron's mother, Jenny Dover

Rule 2. Needs source that this is his mother.

Rule 3: It's no clear what the relevance of the rest of your post is. A guy who worked at the school had worked for a marketing company, and somebody else who worked at same company had started some quirky businesses (which kind of makes sense because that company is apparently known for innovative marketing).