Well there is nothing new about antonymous whistelblowers (since they turn up DEAD otherwise), its worth looking at, at least to the citizen investigators who really CARE about this research
Right. Which is why I simply asked you to repost and clarify in your title, rather than telling you the topic is not allowed. Are you really trying to expose something, or are you merely trying to spread disinfo and stir up trouble? If the former, you ought to simply repost with amended title. If the latter, your present course would continue.
Thats a spurious attack to claim someone is spreading disinfo and "stirring up trouble" because they are taking up this issue with you-a typical reaction from someone who abuses their authority,
I am pointing out how unreasonable your action was
▼ Millennial_Falcon
Rule 3: Apparently, it's an anonymous person claiming to be a former manager for the Obama Foundation. Please clarify and repost. Thx.
▼ sunajAeon
Well there is nothing new about antonymous whistelblowers (since they turn up DEAD otherwise), its worth looking at, at least to the citizen investigators who really CARE about this research
▼ Millennial_Falcon
Right. Which is why I simply asked you to repost and clarify in your title, rather than telling you the topic is not allowed. Are you really trying to expose something, or are you merely trying to spread disinfo and stir up trouble? If the former, you ought to simply repost with amended title. If the latter, your present course would continue.
▼ sunajAeon
Thats a spurious attack to claim someone is spreading disinfo and "stirring up trouble" because they are taking up this issue with you-a typical reaction from someone who abuses their authority, I am pointing out how unreasonable your action was
▼ Millennial_Falcon
I see you chose to continue your course. You are clearly the one making spurious attacks here.