Conspiracy has it that Batman & Robin was introduced with a sole aim at normalizing Pederasty. We all know that Batman and Robin are gay, and Batman is the mature man while Robin is the confused/queer (perhaps) boy under his spell.

Wasn't pederasty basically just pimping yourself out to wealthy men in exchange for financial, career or social benefits? Kind of like how actresses had to sleep with directors/producers in order to get parts? How can you have the MeToo movement and also a movement that wants to examine if pederasty should fall under the LGBQT banner?

I had an uncle who we think engaged in this. He worked for the Catholic Diocese in the Philippines. (I'm not Catholic, by the way.) He had several "houseboys" that worked for him. He did pay to send them to college and they "kept house" for him (though we suspect their jobs consisted of much more than this). Did they benefit from it? Maybe. They did get college tuition, after all. But, I bet they would have preferred not to have to service an older white guy in order to get assistance with college tuition.

This shit has been happening for decades. There was a professor in Canada who was doing exactly the same thing:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Hannon

At this lovely camp, "homosexual" children as young as 8 are invited. If you are a pedo looking for victims, this camp looks like a great place to start.... http://www.tenoaksproject.org/camp-ten-oaks/

Faggots are coming for your kids folks. Just google LGBTQ kids camps. Yes, there are camps all over usa and Canada for "homosexual" children. Check out this gender fluid camp for children as young as 4.

https://www.rainbowdaycamp.org/rainbow-day-camp

I read the bit, and it seems like the organizer of the event is directing scholarly scientific skepticism at pedophilia and homosexuality. It’s not clear to me from this bit if is an attempt at normalizing, or a feeble attempt to oppose pedo normalization. If it is the latter; we’ll it appears to be a lecture with a conversation. If they pass the mike to pedos, it will give them a soapbox... at a university. Just imagine them with their phones out, making fodder for sjw’s on YouTube.

“Deidealizing Queer Studies”. “....investigating a sexually, ethically, and politically dubious kinship form: namely, modern pederasty.”

There are some adult males who enter into some kind of relationship with gay men in order to fund their hetrosexual lifestyle. BUT thats a decision an adult can make, not a child.

As if there isn't enough of this already - the last thing the world needs is training in normalizing and masking, educating the next wave of child-rapists. UPVOAT THIS SUB

Probably wants everyone to have their own bacha bazi boy. Or whatever the fuck they call having a dehumanized underage sex slave dancing around. Animals trying to rationalize their sick agenda.

I'm sorry, but after a cursory search of the event I'm not seeing where it's "promoting" pedophilia. The event, in my limited understanding, seems to be more of an open talk about how Man-Boy love is a dubious behavior and practice in modern times, and how Man-boy love affected author Jean Genet.

If our reaction to everything outside of "the norm" is IIIICCCCCCKKKKK ---- we've already shut down all room to open up a tough, honest conversation. Might as well go back to surfing cat videos and Dank Memes.

Not that I agree with Men grooming/ raping boys, not at all. I'm just saying that I hope there were a few in that University of Michigan audience that stood up and walked out to show disgust, or at least ask some really tough questions about the subject:

Does the speaker think it is okay for a man to groom a boy? Does the speaker think that the "relationship" becomes okay once the boy "likes" it? Where does the speaker draw the line between "criminal pedophilia" and "romantic pedophilia" -- does the speaker think there is a difference at all???

After reading their explanation, I say it is a Bunch of Gobbeldy Goop. What a load of Horse Dung. They use fancy words and phrases that go round and round so you don't know what they are saying. Well, here it is. Sex between men and boys is now considered. part of the Queer Family. LGBTQ and I bet they are just dying to add that P. And yes, it is Not a Relationship. That is something Two Consenting Adults have. They are trying to get people to believe that Pedophiles are "Born That Way". Nope. Not Buying It.

Thank you, OP. This explains why many are so angry about the LGBTQ movement:

An event taking place today at the University of Michigan aims to analyze sexual relations between adult men and adolescent boys.

An event hosted by the University of Michigan’s Institute for Research on Women & Gender on Friday afternoon will focus on analyze the history of “pederastic” relationships. “Pederastic” refers to romantic relationships between adult males and boys.

The event, which is called “Pederastic Kinship: Deidealizing Queer Studies,” will feature Emory University professor Kadji Amin. The lecture will focus relationships between adult males and younger boys.

The event description describes modern pederasty as “sexually, ethically, and politically dubious” but goes on to analyze the role it played for French author and activist Jean Genet.

To identify a relational form as “queer kinship” is to implicitly dignify and redeem it. What are the limits of such redemption?

This talk tests the boundaries of the discourse of queer family by investigating a sexually, ethically, and politically dubious kinship form: namely, modern pederasty.Pederastic kinship names the kinship function of many intergenerational modern pederastic relationships.

Its shape is discernable within French author and activist Jean Genet’s (1910-1986) life practices of affiliation, including his habit of introducing himself into the domesticities of heterosexual couples, his practice of financing the heterosexual households of his younger male lovers, and his fantasy of himself as the adopted foundling of the Black Panther Party.

Pederastic kinship is a forgotten and uncomfortable precursor to gay and lesbian “chosen” and nuclear family that restores power and inequality to overly idealized imaginaries of queer kinship.

According to most definitions, pederasty is defined as sexual relations between two males, one of which is a minor.

Spot the error.....when a man grooms a boy and rapes him, it's not a 'relationship'. It's exploitation, and its a crime.

UPVOAT THIS Please Everyone! We must make sure at least those on this board see this. Pedorastic would be more in line. But yes, they are trying to change the narrative and hoping that no one will notice. What is their purpose of this lecture? Probably to Blur the Lines.

Here we go again. Find another word to call it so it becomes normal behavior. So now they want to differentiate between pedophilia by calling it pederastic. Does that excuse Penn State and Sandusky of raping young boys? I don't think so.