sunajAeon

Don't see how a news org could print any of this in the Pedophile Monarchy's home ground unless they allowed it for some nefarious reason-they actually have victims/whistleblowers doing hard time, in plain site over there

BKAtheManScout

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that not everything is done for "some nefarious reason, " and that sometimes the sunlight peaks through the clouds with a genuine whistleblower.

GrapeJuiceGod

Why the hell don't they ever name names!?

BKAtheManScout

My guess: The article would have been scrubbed off the Mirror.co.uk so fast it would make your head spin. At least this way, the article stands on its own. Not like the abusers would know the names of their victims; they likely just show up, pay a sum of money and then get time in a blacked-out room. If a powerful individual did go after an anonymous article to have it taken down -- that would be stupid on their part and would alert authorities.

pizzaequalspedo

Wow that’s so sad to read

BKAtheManScout

With new knowledge about Judges who traffick in children -- we KNOW that corrupt individuals who should be the protectors are actually installed criminals who facilitate the practice from the inside. That's why it's damn-near-impossible to get the ball rolling on prosecuting those involved.