EricKaliberhall

Deleted. Read rules 1 and 3. Thank you.

EricKaliberhall

Hey @TrumpvsPedos ...

I'm the designated asshole at the moment, so I'm giving you a flair per rule nr 2 (empiricism). Q is still in the conundrum realm. I highly recommend v/GreatAwakening it's one of the best Q subs out there.

Vindicator

If Corsi is actually making claims about pizzagate, we need to leave this up. Corsi has not been proven to be disinfo, Q has not been proven to be disinfo. Mods don't get to personally choose which sources are legit and which aren't (mods aren't allowed to "curate content" under Voat's anti-censorship policies.) If the headline is accurate, and Corsi really talks about pedos going to Gitmo, then we need to leave this up, as it is clearly pizzagate related.

@TrumpvsPedos , can you provide the timestamp location(s) in the video, and perhaps a quote from Dr. Corsi, that supports the claim you've made in your title?

EricKaliberhall

Hey @vindicator

I'm leaving the 24hr flair decision up to you. I've watch the YT clip twice now... Doesn't mention pedophilia. So it should be rule 1 (relevance). My bad.

Vindicator

I watched it also. at 9:03 or so, he mentions Gitmo, but then AJ cuts him off and starts selling his schlock. I left the flair because of this. Let's see if @TrumpvsPedos has additional info supporting his headline. If he does, we can remove the flair. If he doesn't, then the post fails both Rule 1 and 3.

EricKaliberhall

Got it!

ESOTERICshade

Q has not been proven to be disinfo.

By what standard? If I were to take the time I could go back through the history and come up with a big ol list of totally false claims that didn't happen, were not true, or never proven. Kidnapping Soros and locking him up in Camp David being the star in the crown.

3000 kids rescued in Saudia Arabia. No indication at all that any of that was true.

Saudia Arabia being one leg of the global satanic triangle, knocked out for the first time in history, when in reality Saudia Arabia has been in debt to western bankers since the 70's and has a 97 billion dollar budget deficit.

Obama going down because his library got raided.

And these are just the tip of the disinfo iceberg.

Vindicator

To prove something disinfo, IMO, you need to show that it was actually untrue, not that it is unproven. No one has made a thread documenting QAnon spreading things that are provably lies.

ESOTERICshade

To prove something disinfo, IMO, you need to show that it was actually untrue, not that it is unproven. No one has made a thread documenting QAnon spreading things that are provably lies.

Wut? To post in this forum people have to cite or link to things better than that and its always been this way. Some anonymous source saying something on the internet that cannot be verified any other way does not pass the smell test by any means. "an anonymous person on the internet said XYZ" does not pass the smell test for other threads.

you need to show that it was actually untrue,

Soros is not locked up in Camp David. He just heckled Soros in Davos. Obama's library getting raided has no shred of evidence behind it except some anon on 4chan said so. Obama obviously didn't get locked up over it either.

An anon on the internet said 3000 kids got rescued in Saudia Arabia and there is zero to back that up. Where is a shred of proof on any of this?

If I go make me an anon name and call myself "Master Z" will you post all my claims too? Even if there is not a shred of evidence for it?

Vindicator

Wut? To post in this forum people have to cite or link to things better than that and its always been this way.

Oh? I've seen dozens of threads about FBIAnon, Esoteric. And many addressing the anonymous sources of Alex Jones and True Pundit. So, no, it hasn't "always been this way." We weigh claims all the time made by various DC characters. The votes decide.

Soros is not locked up in Camp David...

If you want to make a thread, quoting where QAnon said Soros was locked in Camp David etc. etc. please do so. I don't recall Q making that claim. Certainly anons discussing his messages said this. But that does not make QAnon proven "Disinfo."

If I go make me an anon name and call myself "Master Z" will you post all my claims too?

Q has provided plenty of evidence he is much more than just some anonymous dude, as you well know.

ESOTERICshade

Q has provided plenty of evidence he is much more than just some anonymous dude, as you well know.

I want to make this pont. If Soros had ended up in Camp David for real, you would never let us forget it. Q would be a hero. Since it was bogus you don't want to touch it, because, semantics. You are playing Russian Roulette with this forum after it just got itself straight. Good luck.

ESOTERICshade

If you want to make a thread, quoting where QAnon said Soros was locked in Camp David etc. etc. please do so. I don't recall Q making that claim.

That is not playing fair. Q said they have a "special place" for Soros. Then later the word "special place" was in a Trump Tweet and that was hailed as confirmation that Soros was locked up in Gitmo.

You can't have it both ways or any old bogus Bs coming out of Q could be posted. If Soros had ended up in Camp David you would never let us forget it. Since it was a lie you won't touch it.

Q leads with a jumble of direct statements, implications, and questions. If you want to play that way you can play word games and pretend to get Q out of some of his disinfo but its not straight shooting.

We both know the implication was made that Soros went to Camp David. That Obama would be on his way to jail for the library. 3000 kids got saved.

Two of those we know didn't get locked up, and other than "q said so" we have zilch about 3000 kids getting saved. If the standards drop that low, you will have tons more Q enemies lined up at the gates.

You are not helping your case for Q by doing this because it is so obvious that too many of the things related to Q were lies, didn't come to pass, or whatever. Q's reputation already slid off the cliff for most of the people that were watching with interest. All that is left is a few hardcore followers.

If you start word play on this people will become hostile about it. I'm betting on that. This forum is on the way to getting straightened out. I cannot imagine in my wildest dreams why you would want to start that sort of shit storm.

Eric had it right on the money and used good judgement. I like you Vindicator but when it comes to Q I see a huge blind spot.

DoNotTouchThePizza

so I'm giving you a flair per rule nr 2 (empiricism).Q is still in the conundrum realm.

Mod just got an up vote for that decision :)

WhatevsFloatsYerGoat

Corsi is the crackpot that told us Assange is in Switzerland. And this is Q related. Why is this not flaired for deletion?

ESOTERICshade

Corsi is a shill for the establishment, that is correct. He is simply floating the right side of the fake left/right paradigm.

The Hegelian Dialectic, the clash of opposites. As long as they can keep us fighting each other we won't gang up on them, which is what they fear.

https://files.catbox.moe/txm1fu.PNG

derram

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=ZQe7FyesCY0 :

Jerome Corsi: Attempt On Donald Trump Foiled By Military/Secret Service - YouTube

This has been an automated message.