Youtube SHUTTING DOWN Channels that talked about Pizzagate ( pizzagate )

submitted by 21yearsofdigging

YES, SADLY MANY YOUTUBE CHANNELS HAVE BEEN TARGETED. One, Victurus Libertas did a lot to bring awareness and a clear headed no nonsense approach to evidence that challenged the mainstream B.S story about Pizzagate. Just damn sad. All those videos are now gone. Richie From Boston, same thing. Seaman (like him or hate him) gone. Richie Allen in England, gone

sandywhitewater

Yup, totally. There seems to be one common thread between all the YouTubers that have been axed or restricted in the last couple weeks. I'm putting out feelers to see if anyone's interested in a Class Action against YouTube: https://www.change.org/p/legal-team-tbd-organizing-a-class-action-lawsuit-against-youtube-for-unreasonable-censorship

AnonymousGlitch15

Hey!! Does anyone have any fresh baked bread.. I had some yesterday watching youtube, but it was a bit toasted and was tossed in the garbage.The taste wasn't as I expected. I gathered the crumbs and were going to use them. But after awhile they became to stale and were flushed.

EffYouJohnPodesta

Seems like a few people are getting bans and censorship only to be restored the next day?

21yearsofdigging

Yeah but not Victurus Libertas. I know them and they are good people. They don't have the kind of csh to fight this but I think they may get some outside help

SoldierofLight

Would have been nice if they'd targeted the Pedo channels instead-- but I guess raping children is okay to them versus other YouTubers who are actually trying to protect children.

GreenDell144

Richie was back today... got a lawyer. VictorusLibertas... they were great. I hope they can get back into this.

darkknight111

Ted Cruz has apparently threated to target youtube under Comunications Decent Act if they continue to target conservatives.

Pipebomb

The same Ted Cruz in the DC madam's blackbook? Isn't the Communications Decency Act used to limit free speech? Sounds like political talk and no action.

EffYouJohnPodesta

so then I can sue YouTube for allowing content on the behalf of my stalker - I think I like it

Sickstick

Nothing more fucking dumb than naming anything controversial 'Somethinggate', watergate was named after the hotel that is all adding 'gate' to the end of anything is just fucking stupid. Also why do we care about kids, thought this site was supposed to be for hateful.

Sickstick

Downvoting without commenting, fucking cowardly.

ThePuppetShow

Could you be any more retarded? You're pissing into 100 mph wind.

Sickstick

But i'm right you people who add 'gate' to anything you think is controversial are idiots. And yet your reply had nothing to do with what i said and you offered NOT ONE argument against my point. Jesus you're lazy.

ThePuppetShow

The media named it so they could say we all believed that Hillary was running a child trafficking ring out of Comet pizza. Maybe get your facts straight next time. We all agree the name is retarded, hence the pissing into 100 mph wind.

GreenDell144

Lol. Apropos

think-

Hi @21yearsofdigging ! Thank you for your post, important topic.

I would like to ask you to add at least one link to your post (you know... the rules ...;-) please see sidebar).

You might want to use this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11S2zqSsWRA , but you can of course choose any other link that might be suitable. I think there are a couple of videos on YouTube now that cover the recent deletion of alt media channels.

When you choose a link, please add a short description of its content. Thank you.

I will flair the post 'Edit Warning'. You will have 24 hours to edit. Please ping me or another mod when you will have edited your post. We will then remove the flair. If you won't edit, we will have unfortunately delete the post after 24 hours.

Thanks!

Rule 2: ALL posts must include at least one link.

Rule 3: EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post

21yearsofdigging

Included a couple. have no idea how to ping so here ya go, PING

think-

Just removed the flair....thank you!

carmencita

Let's hope they are reinstated. Fingers XXX

WhatevsFloatsYerGoat

I think that they issued a statement that it was all just a mistake. Presumably all the channels will be back. Which makes sense. It's not like we're living in China, after all... (yet).

Edit: https://thenextweb.com/politics/2018/03/01/whoops-youtube-accidentally-removed-several-alt-right-channels/

doolord

Very specific mistake

ESOTERICshade

I think that they issued a statement that it was all just a mistake. Presumably all the channels will be back. Which makes sense: it's not like we're living in China, after all... (yet).

I have a theory but it will take time to see if it plays out. My theory is that they banned people they really hate and want off the air, and some people they really don't care about or may actually consider an ally.

====

When they "fix their mistake" they will unban people they consider an ally or the people they really didn't care about. But, not unban people like Titus Frost who they seriously don't like.

By doing it this way it appears to all have been a mistake that they corrected, when in reality it was a ruse to whack the people they don't like and leave the people intact they consider an ally.

cutelobster

There appear to be ways around what they are doing. Titus Frost got badly hit because he was engaged in lengthy personal attacks, justified or not. But Lift the Veil has mostly been left alone because of Nathan's deliberate avoidance of certain things e.g. any videos on Douglas Hogg seem to attract immediate strikes. Any videos calling Parkland a false flag/hoax seem to meet the same fate. And many of the Sandy Hook videos have vanished. On the other hand, sonofnewo's continuing series on the Charlottesville car-attack doesn't appear to have attracted any strikes and that's the most convincing exposure of a deep-state hoax I have ever seen.

GreenDell144

Titus Redpilled me in the beginning, but Inthought his hate towards Seaman was distracting and un subbed.

ESOTERICshade

Titus Redpilled me in the beginning, but Inthought his hate towards Seaman was distracting and un subbed.

So far my theory is holding water. Clowns like Defango that serve as a distraction in the truth community have gotten their channel back. Titus and Richie Allen are still banned. "The Black Child" that did the good Hollywood occult videos is still down. Pro Republican Jerome Corsi got has channel back.

21yearsofdigging

Jim and Angie cover a lot of topics but specifically child abuse, especially by the CPS and also in Israel. They have also spoken out (with very credible people such as Dr. John Hall) on the targeting of whistle blowers

yurisrevenge

Oh HELL No!!!!

BKAtheManScout

In my observation, YouTube three-striking them overnight was more a result of the aforementioned questioning the legitimacy of Douglass Stoneman student David Hogg -- NOT Pizzagate. Although, these people banned from YouTube have a pension for seeking the truth (no matter how dark or unorthodox).... so I'll give you that.

pizzaequalspedo

It’s all the same crowd that they’re targeting. Chances are if you’re questioning David Hogg, you also reported on Pizzagate.

YouTube, FB, Google, Twitter et al want to silence anyone on the right that questions the MSM.

They simply look at this shooting as their best chance to censor without blowback (because you can’t question school children).

They’re not a lot different than the local drug gang who uses minors to sell drugs and commit murder because they won’t be punished severely.

BKAtheManScout

I can follow that line of logic. Here's a question: How has nobody been sued for libel in covering Pedogate? Or have they? John Podesta gets an earful on Twitter every time he opens up his turtle-mouth. Why hasn't he gone after someone like Liz Crokin? He's known for "Making an Example" of people, after all.