Of course, he's leaving out that he did nothing to stop it.
He's also leaving out that because it's on the web that it's much easier to infiltrate these groups and round up all the followers. Then again he could have just looked at his own friends.
This link suggests that Mueller might be 'on the level' with regards to policing pedophilia.
Do you not think this lends credibility to the theory that Mueller flipped to Trump a while back and has just been stringng along the 'muh Russia' distraction while Trump/Sessions get all their evidentiary ducks in a row?
Funny, to me it sounds like distraction news from the already happened financial shearing of America's middle class wealth. Diseased rabid weasel asking the paid wolf to monitor the hen house more closely for show. Where was Mueller in Uranium one? Did he recuse himself? By your own admission, you think that Mueller had turned a new leaf as early as 2008? From a legal perspective that theory falls apart like Chinese carp. Just saying.
thats cool, i havent come to any solid conclusion about Muellers 'flipping' - and even if he has, hes still a swamp creature who flipped
its just evidence that adds grist to the mill
He is a swamp creature about to be roasted on the grill as far as I can tell. At the bottom of this article is a news clip. Boom! GOP Lawmaker: Rosenstein Approved Uranium One Deal ...
I don't think any of our officials have any of their ducks in a row. There ducks have a mind of their own and all belong to their donors. Unfortunately. I no longer have faith in any of them at the moment. I must sadly admit.
The time is past. They have been twiddling their thumbs while, well you know the rest, while Rome burns. In the meantime they are turning this country into Rome. They have all Crossed the Line as far as I am concerned. They darn well know about what is going on, and they aren't doing anything while children die and suffer. TIME'S UP.
And Google/FB/Twitter/YT who record and sell every stroke of the keyboard to the NSA/CIA/SPLC/Soros have put their effort into censoring Conservatives rather than stopping child porn.
Ya think? Fast forward 10 years...we are now being told by UN to encourage young kids to consider puberty blockers on the road to mutilating themselves and to teach kids/babies how to consent to sexual stimulation by adults. WTF people!?
Have you ever googled LGBTQ kids camps? They have camps for "gay" children as young as 8. The adults running these facilities need to be fully investigated.
Also... pedophiles use children for homosexual acts and the production of pornography. Encourage kids/teens to become homosexually engaged with other, or offer to 'counsel' them... then molest or film them or both.
Boys in particular are vulnerable to sexual imprinting during puberty, so if they're encouraged to "explore" with their male friends, that can actually increase rates of homosexuality. Women not so much.
id be inclined to suggest women are 'vulnerable' to sexual imprinting but in the reverse sense; abuse by men at an early age will lead to an increase in lesbianism
got no evidence for that , just raw assumption. But of all lovers I've had, the girls who experienced some level of sexual interference by men at an early age were universally more inclined or sympathetic to bisexuality, and the solidly straight girls I've had escaped childhood without interference
I've seen some articles...the ones for any kids to pretend to be 'transgender' for a week. Sick. No doubt the adults are highly suspect or spectacularly unaware of their own sadistic nature.
German sexologist and physician Richard Krafft-Ebing. In his monograph Psychopatia Sexualis, published in 1886, he defined pedophilia as a psychosexual perversion, open to cure.
Around 1906, his British counterpart Havelock Ellis presented pedophilia as an extreme version of normal masculine sexuality.
In 1974, a group of child sex abusers launched the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE). This group was legal at the time, and sought to promote the rights of ‘paedophiles’. The group harnessed the science of Kraft-Ebing and Ellis and espoused the view that children had the right to indulge in their sexual feelings with adults, and argued the age of consent should be lowered to four years old, or abolished altogether.
This was not some fringe group, hidden away. They had thousands of members, many from senior positions in the media, the security services, politics and other establishment positions.
The members were public and built affiliations with the Gay Liberation Front, the Campaign for Homosexual Equality, mental health charity Mind, and even human rights organisation Liberty (previously named The National Council for Civil Liberties). The leaders of PIE shared platforms with Harriet Harman, Patricia Hewitt, and others.
And in many cases they're extremely delusional (members of the Boy Lover movement, not unlike stalkers who imagine 'relationships' with their victim). They believe that having sex with boys saves those kids from becoming what is now coined as 'toxic masculinity'. (They would say a father trying to protect his kids from child predators suffers from it).
From what I've read, Historically, the biggest advocates for the 'Boy Lovers' movement consider themselves sexually enlightened men, (which btw many gays believe they are "sexually advanced and enlightened", thus superior to heterosexuals as well). The members of PIE have advocated that grooming and engaging in sex with boys is their gift to the children who suffer at the hands of parents and family that would prevent what the Boy Lovers consider an essential element to being a male. They also seem to show little regard for females, (in a sense as if they consider them inferior, useful only for attracting young males who might be 'groomed' by the benevolence of a seasoned Boy Lover).
▼ lamplight
I see Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Center for Missing and Exploited Children in this article. Not high on my trust radar.
▼ kestrel9
Correct, a lot there doesn't pass the smell test. It sounds so scripted. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=8139779 Jason Ryan
▼ migratorypatterns
Of course, he's leaving out that he did nothing to stop it.
He's also leaving out that because it's on the web that it's much easier to infiltrate these groups and round up all the followers. Then again he could have just looked at his own friends.
▼ Oh_Well_ian
wow... sounds like projection from a Deep State kid fucker
▼ gaystapo
Uh oh. Whenever the government declares war on something, the supply availability sky rockets.
▼ kestrel9
And they (Clowns in Action) supply it!
▼ carmencita
Trump needs to Toss Him Out. Right NOW.
▼ MolochHunter
now, hang on a minnie
This link suggests that Mueller might be 'on the level' with regards to policing pedophilia.
Do you not think this lends credibility to the theory that Mueller flipped to Trump a while back and has just been stringng along the 'muh Russia' distraction while Trump/Sessions get all their evidentiary ducks in a row?
▼ YogSoggoth
Funny, to me it sounds like distraction news from the already happened financial shearing of America's middle class wealth. Diseased rabid weasel asking the paid wolf to monitor the hen house more closely for show. Where was Mueller in Uranium one? Did he recuse himself? By your own admission, you think that Mueller had turned a new leaf as early as 2008? From a legal perspective that theory falls apart like Chinese carp. Just saying.
▼ MolochHunter
thats cool, i havent come to any solid conclusion about Muellers 'flipping' - and even if he has, hes still a swamp creature who flipped its just evidence that adds grist to the mill
▼ YogSoggoth
He is a swamp creature about to be roasted on the grill as far as I can tell. At the bottom of this article is a news clip. Boom! GOP Lawmaker: Rosenstein Approved Uranium One Deal ...
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/boom-gop-lawmaker-says-rosenstein-
▼ carmencita
I don't think any of our officials have any of their ducks in a row. There ducks have a mind of their own and all belong to their donors. Unfortunately. I no longer have faith in any of them at the moment. I must sadly admit.
▼ MolochHunter
I struggle against the conclusion myself. Sessions has to at least throw us a bone for us to keep faith, and he
Q saying the IG report into Hillary's emails will be the big kicker aint enough for me, not after all this time
▼ carmencita
The time is past. They have been twiddling their thumbs while, well you know the rest, while Rome burns. In the meantime they are turning this country into Rome. They have all Crossed the Line as far as I am concerned. They darn well know about what is going on, and they aren't doing anything while children die and suffer. TIME'S UP.
▼ MolochHunter
i did a post about a year ago titled 'Countdown to Vigilantism' as a social media campaign
I should revisit that idea
▼ carmencita
It's a sad thing to think about, but what else are the choices when they want to back you into a corner.
▼ pizzaequalspedo
And Google/FB/Twitter/YT who record and sell every stroke of the keyboard to the NSA/CIA/SPLC/Soros have put their effort into censoring Conservatives rather than stopping child porn.
It shows what their priorities are.
▼ carmencita
Yes it does. And look at the body of the text in the article. There is no discussion about what the title says. No discussion about Child Pornography.
▼ kestrel9
Ya think? Fast forward 10 years...we are now being told by UN to encourage young kids to consider puberty blockers on the road to mutilating themselves and to teach kids/babies how to consent to sexual stimulation by adults. WTF people!?
▼ gaystapo
Have you ever googled LGBTQ kids camps? They have camps for "gay" children as young as 8. The adults running these facilities need to be fully investigated.
▼ kestrel9
Also... pedophiles use children for homosexual acts and the production of pornography. Encourage kids/teens to become homosexually engaged with other, or offer to 'counsel' them... then molest or film them or both.
▼ gaystapo
Boys in particular are vulnerable to sexual imprinting during puberty, so if they're encouraged to "explore" with their male friends, that can actually increase rates of homosexuality. Women not so much.
▼ MolochHunter
id be inclined to suggest women are 'vulnerable' to sexual imprinting but in the reverse sense; abuse by men at an early age will lead to an increase in lesbianism
got no evidence for that , just raw assumption. But of all lovers I've had, the girls who experienced some level of sexual interference by men at an early age were universally more inclined or sympathetic to bisexuality, and the solidly straight girls I've had escaped childhood without interference
▼ kestrel9
And to pave the way to legalized pedophilia, off the back of a gay rights movement, seems logical to want to increase the population of gays.
▼ gaystapo
Absolutely.
▼ kestrel9
I've seen some articles...the ones for any kids to pretend to be 'transgender' for a week. Sick. No doubt the adults are highly suspect or spectacularly unaware of their own sadistic nature.
▼ gaystapo
The LGBTQ movement has an end goal of legalizing pedophilia. If an 8 year old can consent to life long sterilization, sex is nothing!
▼ kestrel9
That goal has been going decades....
Pedophilia
German sexologist and physician Richard Krafft-Ebing. In his monograph Psychopatia Sexualis, published in 1886, he defined pedophilia as a psychosexual perversion, open to cure.
Around 1906, his British counterpart Havelock Ellis presented pedophilia as an extreme version of normal masculine sexuality.
▼ Vindicator
When it is in truth exactly the opposite of "masculine". Men prey on kids because they are cowards too insecure to approach mature women.
▼ kestrel9
And in many cases they're extremely delusional (members of the Boy Lover movement, not unlike stalkers who imagine 'relationships' with their victim). They believe that having sex with boys saves those kids from becoming what is now coined as 'toxic masculinity'. (They would say a father trying to protect his kids from child predators suffers from it).
From what I've read, Historically, the biggest advocates for the 'Boy Lovers' movement consider themselves sexually enlightened men, (which btw many gays believe they are "sexually advanced and enlightened", thus superior to heterosexuals as well). The members of PIE have advocated that grooming and engaging in sex with boys is their gift to the children who suffer at the hands of parents and family that would prevent what the Boy Lovers consider an essential element to being a male. They also seem to show little regard for females, (in a sense as if they consider them inferior, useful only for attracting young males who might be 'groomed' by the benevolence of a seasoned Boy Lover).