SkinnyManAss

Something I have figured out... the vast majority of trannies are also pedophiles and rapists.

pizza-party-pooper-2

Can't believe I'm saying this but I TOTALLY agree with this Blaire White. I also noticed that Blaire's eagerness to speak the TRUTH got the channel demonitized. (Ever notice how there is the word "demon" in demonitize??)

Nana66

Adult children transitioning is mother abuse...I speak from experience.

polwarrior30

Everyone’s moving the discussions of deleted posts here at voat to its happening.

Deleted posts: Gondwana children’s choir had the pedo symbol as their logo

Little red fox next door to comet has the pedi logo

Make a wish has the spiral as well

The list goods on an on

http://itshappening.pcriot.com/forums/forum/pizzagate/

carmencita

Daddy's Little Sweetheart was Money's Experiment in Terror. Using OUR children to spread their Wicked Evil.

Lafall

Pedophilia, polyamory and beastiality are next ? https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=yA8fgaBSDUw

SeeHear

And incest.

rooting4redpillers

A disgusting behavior that’s being pushed into entertainment. Not necessarily portrayed as “normal” (yet), but close, getting there. Desensitizing always, a little at a time, counting on soft young brains to soak it in.

Tazzermalt

psycho horror Canadian 'doctor' Dr. Money founder of the modern transgender movement? https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=SLFGMWoQaCU David Reimer: A Transgender Experiment. .... http://libros.am/book/read/id/381941/slug/the-riddle-of-gender-science-activism-and-transgender-rights McHugh is nonetheless willing to concede that researchers may someday find a biological explanation for at least some forms of gender variance. “If people are afflicted in fetal life by an abnormal hormonal thing, they can have all kinds of peculiar sexual attitudes when they come out,” he admits. But he is quick to distinguish between individuals who can prove that they were subject to “an abnormal hormonal thing” in prenatal life from those who, for whatever reason, choose to dress and live as members of a sex other than that dictated by their anatomy. And he remains adamantly opposed to any form of surgical intervention for the latter group. “This surgery is serious surgery and it’s a misuse of resources when I don’t think that the problem lies in the bodily structure.” Despite the controversy surrounding sex-change surgery and his ongoing battle with adversaries within Johns Hopkins and without, John Money was continuously funded by the National Institutes of Health for more than thirty-five years, from the start of his career to its ignominious end. In June 1997, Milton Diamond and Keith Sigmund-son published an article in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine that cast doubt not only on Money’s theories but also on his credibility as a researcher. Sigmundson had for many years overseen the care of Money’s most famous patient, a twin boy named David Reimer, who had been raised as a girl after his penis was accidentally severed during a circumcision. Money had long used this case (identified as “John/Joan” in the Diamond article) as proof that the sex of assignment and rearing trumped all other variables in the formation of gender identity in normatively sexed, as well as intersexual, children. Despite her XY genotype and male genital and endocrine profile at birth, “Joan” was a normal little girl, Money asserted in scientific articles, books, lectures, and interviews, who “preferred dresses to pants, enjoyed wearing her hair ribbons, bracelets and frilly blouses, and loved being her Daddy’s little sweetheart.” Sigmundson, who had witnessed firsthand the acute misery suffered by the child and his family as the boy’s masculinity asserted itself in the face of repeated efforts to convince him that he was a girl, had been contacted by Diamond, who sought information about the child for many years. https://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2017/02/16/trans-kids-2-the-intersex-brain/ The very large differences between one trans person’s needs and another, which were made clear via the resource guide Families in TRANSition, at the end of the first part of this blog on transgender youth – and were later commented upon knowledgeably by Peace in the course of some excellent exchanges between readers – draw further attention to the question of what being transgender really means.

For this, that we have to ponder what constitutes gender itself. As Robin Marantz Henig wrote for the National Geographic’s special issue, gender is an amalgamation of several elements, including our biological sex: chromosomes (those X’s and Y’s), anatomy (internal sex organs and external genitals), hormones (relative levels of testosterone and oestrogen), psychology (self-defined gender identity), and culture (socially defined gender behaviours).

What gender includes can be very confusing, though, because it depends on the context. Sexologist John Money introduced the terminological distinction between biological sex and gender as a role in 1955 (long before his now discredited recommendation of surgical sex-reassignment on David Reimer in his infancy). However, Money’s meaning of the word did not become widespread until the 1970s, when feminist theory embraced the concept of a distinction between biological sex and the social construct of gender. For the purpose of today’s discussion, we definitely need to engage with the biological side. A Modern Day Horror Story On The Origin Of The Transgender Movement http://www.returnofkings.com/75405/a-modern-day-horror-story-on-the-origin-of-the-transgender-movement Crime 2: Sexual Experimentation