Podge512

Another pathetic attempt by fakestream media to prop up and apply undertaker's rouge to the long dead abduction narrative in the run up to the 11th anniversary of Madeleine McCann's reported disappearance. Why has this "Andres" only spoken out now when the highly questionable 'Smithman' efits were made public in a 2013 Crimewatch special? If 'Smithman' is Scotland Yard's chief suspect, why has the Metropolitan Police Service confirmed that, "...the efits do not form part of any current appeal." as per McCann researcher Tony Bennet's FOI request (see link below)?

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t15017-request-for-review-3-apr-2018-unsatisfactory-reply-from-met-pollce-information-rights-unit-to-questions-about-operation-grange-and-smithman#384265

To reiterate, the bogus abduction narrative is, in my view, being kept alive to cover up the fact that Madeleine was killed by the paedophile(s) her parents pimped her out to (very possibly the Podestas and/or Clement Freud).

urbanmoving

Bingo, The Pedoestas and their crew were clearly identified the media is making up lies trying to cover their boys' tracks

FuckUredditFuckuSpez

Wow. I hope this received more attention When it was posted from someone else... Because This article, At this time, Is a huge deal.

YogSoggoth

That is a fair enough translation for me to understand what he is saying. The only thing that I wonder is if he even knows who John Podesta is? All we got is Andres, a businessman from Milan. This guy could be in danger and not know it.

Factfinder2

Interesing info about Galacia. Thanks for that.

Like you, I think Andres could be in danger.

Whether the sketch is of Podesta or someone else, the intruder was a "regular customer" of that hotel, where the doors didn't lock normally and where the proprietors covered for him, characterizing him as a harmless man who "liked children." Scotland Yard also buried his testimony. These are all red flags.