FBI restructure required before the storm ( pizzagate )

submitted by GoodGodKirk

As high profile firings, arrests, and resignations occur, I wanted to point out the following:

  • Jim Rybicki, chief of staff and senior counselor - FIRED
  • James Baker, general counsel - FIRED
  • Andrew McCabe, deputy director - FIRED
  • James Comey, director - FIRED
  • Bill Priestap, Head of Counterintelligence and Strzok’s boss - Cooperating witness [power removed]
  • Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness [power removed]
  • Lisa Page, attorney with the FBI's Office of the General Counsel - cooperating witness [power removed]

I think the stage is almost set for the arrests to start. Rosenstein is last man standing and is keeping Mueller around.

We should start seeing the arrests we want soon. Arrests occurring all over so there’s no where to run, like last month:

Don’t forget: track the notable resignations: https://. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/1B-95giwldeKgsd0nYiw_sEaSf4kGNLZgEIvEhL2mVAw/htmlview

PizzaStreamerLive

Good and valid point. A lot has to be done and as mentioned from the start. We only have one chance to do this right. So we need to go slow and be methodical. From the foundation up. Soon there will be no power at the top.

Vindicator

Don’t forget: track the notable resignations

Here's the link to the master resignation tracking list: https:// docs.google. com/spreadsheets/d/1B-95giwldeKgsd0nYiw_sEaSf4kGNLZgEIvEhL2mVAw/)

Here's the link to the Human Trafficking arrests master tracking list: https: //docs.google. com/spreadsheets/d/1MAnZZoD7y5Ydwx2rSrZualrZTNUYDY7gozTXkT0YUOs/edit?usp=sharing)

GoodGodKirk

Thanks for posting that. It wouldn’t allow me to post earlier and I had to remove it. Didn’t want my post removed either.

Vindicator

I looks like you got hit with the edit bug, too, GGK. Basically, the view and vote counts get stuck at whatever point they were at when you edited your post, if you edit. Hopefully, Putt will be fixing this soon. If you feel like you didn't get enough visibility, you are welcome to repost and self-delete this version. We don't consider that spamming.

GoodGodKirk

Yeah, I edited it once, but I wasn’t allowed to post due to certain domains linked. (I usually attempt to provide proofs for all content)

Once I “broke” the docs link, I was able to post but then thought “oh shit, I just circumvented the rules!”, and edited to remove the link.

Meh, I’ll post it again when an update occurs. Now that I have your blessing, I’ll include the link next time.

Edit: I’m showing 46 upvoats in submissions.

nzmc

how do you know if its not already done? future proves past q

GoodGodKirk

Cause Rosenstein is still employed.

cutelobster

A tricksy running-together of U. S. firings and resignations with arrests in other countries. Where are the high-profile arrests in the U. S.? People get hired and fired from govt departments all the time, especially at those hgher levels where the appointments are political - it doesn't mean anything special.

Jammer78

Trump's priority right now is Iran. When the arrests start he will be temporarily weakened while he deals with the fallout, making it harder for him to act overseas. He has the DoJ and the Republican congress under control so he can afford to wait a bit.

The Horowitz report is May 15 I believe. We might see arrests then.

GoodGodKirk

Someone has posted the sheets link keeping track of the resignations, check it out.

Lordbananafist

Q Narrative: "Our top weapon against the zionist military complex is the zionist military complex. We have to save the zionist military complex so we can fight the zionist military complex."

dooob

Have you seen the recent Q drops? Deep State is turning on Mueller.

GoodGodKirk

Yeah, I saw that Comey threw him under the bus at some point with one of his investigations. Not sure what’s coming of it, but he’s surrounded by Clinton cronies. Most likely his undoing.

DeathToMasonsASAP

There is no storm. Don't you remember you were sold that the storm begins when trump gets back from China. Nothing happened. You are moving the goal post back yet again. Arrest are not imminent. The FBI is a tool of the Banking cartel, they protect those doing opperations for them. There is nobody high up in the FBI who is not theirs. The entire government is phony. Stop selling Q.

Psalm144-1

With Q, "arrests" and real "justice" is always just around the corner. Its always "next week" which then turns into "next month" then ultimately turns into some future date months and months out. All these dates come and go and guess what... Podesta, Clinton, Alefantis are still walking free. WHERE ARE THE PERP WALKS?! I can't stand how much blind faith people put in Q. I'm nto totally against Q but i CAN STAND IT when people say shit like "dont worry Q said x".

All the Q worshipers seem to be in some kind of hypnotic trance. Lingering on the words of a completely anonymous online identity and following orders like good boys and girls. I think its time to drop Q and get back to what we do best, digging and researching on our OWN and busting stories wide open!

WalnutSauceGoat

Well put.

dooob

I am glad the shills dont like Q, it only tells me Q is real.

PrettyBigDouche

Unfortunately I believe you are correct. It's nice to dream though.

Narcissism

"Stop selling Q" Has Q become a new acronym for BS?

dooob

Sleeper account

8_billion_eaters

Re: All those people that were granted immunity from prosecution in the HRC email scandal by the top investigators of the (presumably corrupt) FBI never turned over any (as far as we know) incriminating evidence against Hillary and the DNC.

Question: Is that immunity from prosecution still valid?

Blacksmith21

I'm guessing there is a piece of USC that may invalidate immunity under certain conditions, i.e. treason.

dooob

Considering how dirty they are, even if the immunity is valid, they have rooms full of skeletons.

LostandFound

Immunity deals are generally given on the basis that the individual has provided a full and transparent account of all events. If it can be demonstrated that someone given immunity lied or was knowingly not fully transparent then they blow their deal.

Also note that the immunity deal given would be specific to that investigation most of which as I understand were given in relation to the HRC server, so crimes outside of that are still fair game.

GoodGodKirk

Not if everyone who issued them are fired.

Lordbananafist

hahahaha you're a funny guy

8_billion_eaters

Seems like it would be a "sticky" legal battle to indict any of them. (Like the mid-level tech that set up her illegal server).

GoodGodKirk

Possibly. But take out the roadblocks and it should become easier.

NoBS

It is easier to lose immunity than it is to get a deal to sign your "privacy" away. Setting them with a recent lie is no longer illegal or considered a legitimate policy violations. They did it to Flynn and even as far back as Martha Stewart.

They (Police & Courts) have become masters of Blackmail and Extortion. All legal and shit.

derram

https://archive.fo/HBwk4 :

Nicolas Sarkozy in police custody over Gaddafi allegations | World news | The Guardian

This has been an automated message.