Psalm100

The best source by far for facts in the case is the judge's 33-page opinion in the 1993 custody dispute between Farrow and Allen. (The media seems to mostly ignore it. I'd never heard of it until today).

It's very detailed and the judge went over all the evidence and made a good case for why Allen could be guilty. He also outright found him to be an unfit parent, calling him self-absorbed and lacking in judgment, and said the custody case was even a sham. Allen couldn't answer basic questions about the children.

What you never hear in the media, for one thing, is that Allen was already in therapy for acting inappropriately with Dylan (I believe even before his relationship with Soon-Yi came out), as if obsessed with her.

Links: https://www.scribd.com/document/205403621/Allen-v-Farrow-Custody-Ruling-June-7-1993 https://www.huffingtonpost.com/danny-shea/heres-the-1993-woody-alle_b_4746866.html

Thread I posted about it:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2561605

Factfinder2

Thank you for this. I added your links to the OP.

GreenDell144

In any scenario, to my mind, an innocent person very clearly say “NO!” Probably more than once, probably preceded by an expletive. They will likely get angry... also... I have noticed that many suspects and many that have been found guilty of this crime hem and haw... almost as if it they support this behavior; can’t deny it; are proud of it. Ewwww. Sheeeesh.

GoatyVoaty

i like how she wrote: What if it had been your child, Cate Blanchett? Louis CK? Alec Baldwin?

This world is not much different now than back then unfortunately...

Userly

He said exactly not yes. His reply was absolutely reasonable. No need to make anything up.

VeryOffended

Look, coaching is a real thing when it comes to psychotic women (or men) in nasty settlements. I'm not entirely sure why parents who have differences with each other and decide to separate need to drag their children in as leverage when there is no abuse from either party towards the children. The damage that bitter parents (usually mothers) are willing to do their children for court, custody, and monetary reasons is absolutely reprehensible. However, Mr. Allen here is above and beyond when it comes to lies and deception. Why in the world would his relationship with Soon-Yi be disregarded and considered innocent. What a sick man. His sickness is written in his body language, and it's been coded into society to not recognize it.

eucalyptus_spearmint

Yeah, it didn't help his case much that he "looks like one of those guys" 😅

Shizy

I'd say both Woody and Mia are shit ass parents! Those poor kids were just pawns. Kinda reminds me of Angelina's mixed bag of children that she likes to parade around.

Gothamgirl

Same here, Madonna and Rosey O'Donnell too.

VeryOffended

I feel that there is a lot more to come about Brad and Angelina's children.

Shizy

There was a CDAN blind not that long ago that seemed to indicate that Angelina employs "nannies" from each of her adopted children's native country to teach the child the culture and have sex with them! Sick and twisted stuff!

VeryOffended

Any chance you have any links saved, archived, or downloaded any of It? I'm not testing you. I'm just being lazy and hoping you have a button. No worries if you don't

Shizy

Unfortunately no, I didn't keep that. I thought there was some type of search option on CDAN but I didn't see it when I tried to look just now

VeryOffended

Thanks for checking!

carmencita

Something Rather Odd: https://www.nytimes.com/1984/09/22/nyregion/the-city-obscenity-spliced-intofilmatschool.html

The Aronson mentioned in the story is the brother in law of woody allen. He has passed away but he was a principal. There was a short blurb during a Laurel and Hardy movie where some pornography was shown to a group of 9 & 10 yrs. olds.

The film, shown Thursday to an audience of 200 9- and 10-year-olds, was rented from a Brooklyn film distributor, Sheldon Fineberg, whom the school has dealt with for five years, Mr. Aronson said. He said that no one at the distribution company had been able to provide an explanation for the inserted material. May be nothing. Sheldon Fineberg owned Cadence Films.

YogSoggoth

"Child molestation is a touchy subject", Woody Allen. Great find, and I think Sheldon Fineberg came between the crosshairs in some thread I read.

carmencita

Forgot to say, Yes, that is a very strange remark. He is a master of deceit. After all he is an actor.

carmencita

I remember something too a while back and cannot find it. Cadence owned Marvel and then it was sold. The years work out just fine. Also Allen worked for Cid Cesar as a writer back in the day. I have seen shady things on Cid before and pedos hang together. Allen's brother in law being a Principal is somewhat odd as well. Funny how they manage to pick just the right jobs to continue their perversions. The whole family must be involved in some way. Perverts or Protectors.

Factfinder2

This is a very interesting find. Glad to see @VeryOffended plans to look into it.

Apparently, splicing in porn "cut-pieces" is a thing--at least in Bangladesh, where the film industry is owned by the state, according to this researcher and author:

https://cup.columbia.edu/book/cut-pieces/9780231162883

carmencita

A strip spliced into the reels. Well, I don't know much about film making but this seems to be pretty obvious. I don't think they were filming one scene and went straight to porn. No, someone took the time and trouble to insert this piece of porn into another film. Something entirely different no doubt. Subliminal Brainwashing.

Cadence was also owned Marvel for a while. I wanted to do a little more research but can't find the time right now. Hope to get back to his family.

VeryOffended

Very interesting, but I need to subscribe to read more. Have you done so? I'd like to hear/read more. That shit is definitely fucking weird. I will be doing a more formal search at some point tonight bc I don't sleep normal hours.

carmencita

Oh yes, I read more. I use to read books, but now I read so much on here, that it is overwhelming. I find the story rather strange.

derram

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=KPs5TAO8Hj4 :

Woody Allen defends himself on 60 Minutes in '92 - YouTube

https://archive.fo/tLvEX :

The New York Times > Page Not Found

This has been an automated message.