Pedophile Politics ( pizzagate )

submitted by Blacksmith21

I'm not sure why this isn't taking off more. Personally, I think the censorship volume has been turned up to 10 on this subject.

There is an election occurring in a close-in to Washington DC in VA-10. The district incumbent, Barbara Comstock is vulnerable and is fairly well-documented as a Never-Trump RINO. That being said, she has earned an A rating from the NRA. And the NRA rarely backs a shitbag (modern history). (I'm sure there are a couple in their 100+ year existence)

What does this have to do with Pizzagate? A Congressional District, scant miles from Comet Ping Pong Pizza, has a candidate who is making direct and bold allegations of a candidate being associated with all of the typical signs of what the collective would assume is pedo related:

  • Fostered 46 children
  • Founded a charity for sexually abused boys....with a convicted pedophile.
  • USAF Combat pilot
  • Changed his name

All of it well documented at shadyshak.com

If you turn on WMAL, the DC local conservative powerhouse FM station, every commercial break is running an ad from one side or the other with the ugliest campaign ads I've ever heard.

And now I stand corrected. Yes, you read right, I am doing a 180. Why? Because I made a post 8 days ago: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2567860 which all but insinuated Shak Hill was a pedo.

And, I believe in Dr. Sebastian Gorka 100%. This is beyond an endorsement for Shak Hill: https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=jRZhsGNYSCA

But WTF? If you look at the site, the court docs, the fairly credible-looking allegations against Shak, he looks like a pedo, on paper. Did we just watch the MSM/CIA/DS sheep dip court docs (like w/ Trump) to make Shak Hill look like a pedo?

John LeCarre couldn't make this stuff up. Posted in v/Pizzagate for visibility. Related because of weaponized pedo accusations.

Vindicator

Flairing "Possible Disinfo" based on OP's sense that one or both of these candidates may be part of a psyop involving pedo assocoations.

urbanmoving

Gorka LMAO

Vindicator

Blacksmith, are you saying you are debunking yourself? If so, do you want me to put a "Debunked" or "Possible Disinfo" flair on your previous thread for posterity?

Also, I've been thinking we need a new flair for this information warfare/Op Mockingbird crap. Maybe "Scrutinize!" or "Mockingbird Alert" or something. Thoughts?

Blacksmith21

I'm saying I am not sure what to believe at this point. One is a Never-Trumper with an A-rating from the NRA and the other a combat pilot who fostered 40-something kids and supposedly had a failed charity with a convicted pedophile. The truth is somewhere in between.

Yes, I am doing at least a 90, if not a full 180. No one, I mean no one here is right 100% of the time. If we don't maintain the ability to correct ourselves and revise a position based on new intelligence, then we shouldn't be here. The truth is what matters. Nothing else.

I'm not a mod anymore....

Vindicator

Yes, I am doing at least a 90, if not a full 180. No one, I mean no one here is right 100% of the time. If we don't maintain the ability to correct ourselves and revise a position based on new intelligence, then we shouldn't be here. The truth is what matters. Nothing else.

I totally, 100% agree. And I think it's the mark of a true investigator to do this, which I greatly respect. :-)

I'm not a mod anymore....

I know...that's why I'm asking if you would like me to put a flair on the original thread.

Blacksmith21

Technically, you should flair both posts. Both could be pedo diinformation for all we know.

truthdemon

Maybe they all are pedos...to be invited to the washington crowd

13Buddha

This is f'd-up, but then again, what isn't?