Why Pedophilia And Pedophiles Are Not A Risk To Children (pedo normalisation alert) ( pizzagate )

submitted by MolochHunter

https://medium.com/pedophiles-about-pedophilia/why-pedophilia-and-pedophiles-are-not-a-risk-to-children-4d00a935dd39

serious article

this deviant clown tries to make a distinction between convicted child sex abusers and the word 'paedophile'

like, the word 'paedophile' now ONLY applies to those attracted to children who do not act on it

because Liberalism is a mental disorder. They think they can change the definition of any word at a whim to evade consequences for their perversions

GreenDell144

Too bad they can’t be hypnotized into being sexually attracted to tree shredders.

carmencita

I am just so sick of this. I got through about 2 paragraphs. It's not explicit, it does not contain any NSFW content, but just reading what he is advocating should make all of us disgusted (and I am sure you are). How many of these idiots must we deal with until they are unmasked to the public. Memes seem to Work Wonders. Some sent to his Twitter

MolochHunter

me too, i couldnt read past the first few paras

that probably why theres no detractors in the comments, too disgusted to persist with it

carmencita

I am so sick of it but it won't make me quit. This is just another carbon copy of their attempt to get at Our Children. They are really good at grooming themselves to believe they have that right. NOpe.

Narcissism

Its like saying a lion is not a risk to a gazelle...

spacepopecoast2coast

when does this narrative really hit the mainstream? like 2020? 2021?

its coming thats for sure - and its going to give me an aneurysm

HST

I heard this shit 4 years ago from a kid who is certainly some kind of sexual deviant (and was also a friend in middle and highschool but kept his problem a complete secret until senior year)

Gothamgirl

Found pedo website with girl lover logo in the comments.

Visions of Alice

http://archive.is/UwvCt

https://alicelovers.net/

cantfindmenow

I came across that alice lovers site too. I found it via this blog - another attempt at normalising paedophilia https://consentinghumans.wordpress.com/2015/12/09/18-common-misconceptions-about-paedophiles-paedophilia-update-reblog/ What concerns me about alice lovers is why hasn't it been shut down? In the FAQs ot details how to send encrypted messages and how to use Tor, surely a clear indicator that the people using it intend to share sick illegal images. Who do you report this stuff to? I emailed the site admin to ask why they were encouraging paedophilia. No surprise I've had no reply.

GreenDell144

Would it be worthwhile to post contact emails for sites linked to pedophilia? Obviously, a database would be useless, because they can just change their emails, but we could fill their inbox. We could even try DDS attack’s on their sites...

Gothamgirl

The FBI would be my guess, but I am not sure anything can be done unless you find something illegal, like cp, abuse or trafficking etc.

mooteensy

I'd be shocked if you got a reply but if you do I'd love to hear, keep us posted please!

Silencio

Grim

Podge512

You'll have undoubtedly noticed how it tries to frame paedophilia as just another sexual orientation, as well as trying to elicit sympathy for the poor child rapists who can't help the way they feel. These vermin are becoming more brazen, stepping more and more into the light, but at least it helps us identify them more easily.

Silencio

Ive seen the slippery slope, but i honestly think the line of tolerating degeneracy is drawn at protecting children from clearly harmful things (exposure to degeneracy seems to be tolerated, direct involvement hopefully will not be), at least I hope so. The slippery slope jopefully hits a point that peoplr will not allow the next progression, i think if there is a point, it's at protecting kids

spacepopecoast2coast

yeah lets hope, but I just have a feeling its going to be framed as "kids nowadays are smart, and should be allowed to make their own decisions cuz love<3" and people will eat that shit up (aka social media will force it down their throats)

and it will start out with 13-16 yr olds, def not super young right away

MolochHunter

yeap

I just love the logic of this postmodern linguistic deconstructionism. Lets apply that to other crimes, right?

A robber, is someone who is tempted to steal - but doesnt (ok - so what name do we call those who do?)

a murderer, is someone who is tempted to murder but actually doesnt (ok - so what name do we call those who do?)

just staggering the authority these people presume over language and ideas