Pizzalawyer

for those who have a computer and can download the 500+ report there is a section devoted to John Podesta, I don't know what it says but someone needs to look at it and see if there is more there than Horowitz described in testimony. Check the table of contents to get the page numbers. Happy Hunting.

JackBlack1

Can someone explain to me why nobody here ever says Trump is dirty but Clinton is always the very definition of Satan herself? After seeing it enough times, I'm beginning to wonder about this. I know Clinton is dirty and corrupt but Trump is no saint by any means. So why the double standard?

Psalm144-1

All it would take is for Trump to take to twitter to blow the lid off of ALL of this! The fact that there have been ZERO perp walks almost 2 years later is very worrisome. Trump is likely in on this whole thing, otherwise where are the perp walks?!

siegnagel

Trump maybe a womaniser, but the last time I checked they were consenting and legal. There's no crime there. Trump isn't perfect, but the World needs him right now.

Fateswebb

Because we don't have mountains of evidence of trump being dirty like we do Clinton(s) and every time someone comes forth with the very claim it ends up being complete bullshit. If you have something by all means speak up.

GreenDell144

And everyone that has had legit dirt on the Clintons is in the morgue.

Hortance

Which of the other 17 GOP candidates could have beaten her AND the media? (Which is what Trump did.) Seriously, don't mean to be contrary, but the key was the appeal to Rust Belt Reagan Democrats. OH, MI, WI, PA....Nobody else would have done that.

Fateswebb

Well I liked that he wasn't a deep state insider and his policies weren't bad. I would have liked Rand Paul better, but as you point out Rand cant beat the media, the voting fraud, and hillaries league of zombie followers. Trump did damn near the impossible. And they have tried since to find anything they can make up to get him down And have come up with anything even slightly legit yet. So dude that's why...

Vindicator

Hi Orangutan. Please add a description of linked content to the thread so this doesn't have to be removed per Rule 3. Thank you.

Orangutan

Done, thanks. Please remove the 24 hour Grace Period flair?

Vindicator

Thanks. I've removed the flair. However, your description is so vague, the thread probably will not take off like it should. Kennedy is raising the question of pay for play here between Kadzik and Podesta. Someone should spell that out and discuss the implications.

SoSpricyHotDog

Specifically asking in context to comms w/ Kadzik. So awesome that this was requested of Horowitz.

Just more coincidences though... Nothing to see here folks... hahahaha

Orangutan

Relevance: I think this John Podesta communication leak was the thing that started this whole mess. Here is a U.S. Senator asking the top people at the FBI about these particular communications from this individual. Thanks for sharing and re-uploading.

think-

Hi @Orangutan , could you add this comment to the body of the post?

(Just click 'edit', and copypaste the comment.) We can then remove the flair.

Thank you very much for posting here - please don't forget to always add a short description of the link you post.

Rule 3: EACH link in your post must include a description of content

Thanks! Please keep up the good work.

@Vindicator @ben_matlock