Diego Kaplan defending Netflix and his film 'Desire' ( pizzagate )

submitted by Enigmatic_Continuum

Diego Kaplan is saying that there's no child pornography in his film 'Desire'. LOL! I wonder what his definition of child pornography is? He's definitely a pedo. And who are these mothers?

Kaplan disputed the child pornography categorization and told Indiewire that the filming of the scenes was done “under the careful surveillance of the girls’ mothers” and neither of the girls were aware of what they were depicting.

Check out the article for his ridiculous defense. https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/netflix-desire-film-child-pornography-director-statement-1202862741/

My thread when this story broke: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2610730

Enigmatic_Continuum

Hey, thanks! It's very interesting that they're bringing this up again. What does this tell me? It's saying that we're witnessing a war between corporations. It appears that Bezos is doing all he can to run his competition into the ground. Trust not. They're peas in the same pod trying to get us to choose between the lesser of two evils.

Hagen19

Diego Kaplan is of course yet another talmudic kike doing what his kind do best.

Sackajahweeda

Just because there are demon parents out there that will allow this shite DOESNT MAKE IT ANY LESS CP DIEGO!!!

GreenDell144

Yeah, keep polishing that turd, Diego. Nobody’s listening except pedos.

ErrantCognition

This is such an incredible non issue. You guys are faggots

gamepwn

Only faggots are people like you who don't give a fuck until pedophilia ends up getting legalized and our world becomes a nightmare. Fuck you.

Adminstrater

neither of the girls were aware of what they were depicting.

Doesn't make it right.

Sackajahweeda

That phrasing RIGHT THERE tells you this shit isnt right. If it was ALL GOOD WHY NOT CLUE THE KID IN...OH because IT ISNT!!!

Boyakasha

Someone please execute this asshole. FFS.

Shizy

It really doesn't matter how he tries to minimize what he did, the fact remains that what he did legally fits the definition of producing child porn. Netflix needs to be held accountable for distributing this garbage.

Baichu

Netflux will not be accountable because people are paying them money to watch this stuff. THAT is one of the big problems with entertainment, be it tv, movies, netflux whatever, people are paying and watching.

tholinz

Does it matter, legally, if the girls knew what they were being asked to do? It’s still pornography.

Shizy

I would say it's not even a factor based on reading the statutes regarding child pornography and sexual abuse.

Enigmatic_Continuum

Exactly, and the proper authorities need to investigate the mothers and find out how many takes it took to get this scene to his liking. They should also tear apart his studio and computers to find out if he has any CP.

Shizy

Those mothers are disgusting! It's their job to protect those girls yet they watched and allowed them to be exploited!

This guy is a sick POS, I don't doubt he has more CP somewhere. He sounds like a typical pedo saying the kids didn't even know what was going on so it's perfectly ok! Thats pedo logic!

HillBoulder

Everyone has their price.

Sackajahweeda

Junkie parents getting their drugs on or demon parents totally consenting to demon shit they are into themselves.

Shizy

To sell out their own children? I sure as shit don't have a price to allow anyone to do this nasty shit to my kids! Ever!! There's NO excuse for that. They don't deserve those kids

HillBoulder

Obviously yes. You wouldn't do it but lots of people out there would. You may want to come to terms with that.

Shizy

You have no idea who you're talking to! I have worked with the worst of the worst of society including people who pimped their kids for drugs. Looked the other way while their kid was being raped so they would have a place to "crash". I absolutely know how bad people are to their children. My problem with your statements was you seemed to assume everyone is scummy and would hand over their child if the price is right. Absolutely not true.

HillBoulder

I don't care who I'm talking to. Save your emotions for someone who gives a shit.

gamepwn

Thing is it's not just her who wouldn't. I wouldn't and I promise millions of more wouldn't. Maybe you and sick people like you would sell out children but you could offer me an infinite amount of money and the most gorgeous woman in the world and I would still spit in your face or knock you out if I was even offered We don't all have a price to destroy a child's life only moral less greedy pieces of shit.

Shizy

You make assumptions like an asshole and then can't handle being told you're wrong? What a dumbass! Get lost weirdo!

HillBoulder

Like I said, save youe emotions for someone who gives a shit. Thanks, bitch.

HillBoulder

Unfortunately, yes.

Shizy

I'm not sure what your values are or who you associate with, but I know plenty of people who would die before they would allow anything to happen to their child, regardless of money.

HillBoulder

Price doesn't necessarily mean money. I can't believe you're this surprised to find out there are people out there who will sell their children for (insert reason here).

Shizy

I'm sure pedos like to think that any kid can be had for the right price! Sick and creepy that you're so fixated on this!

HillBoulder

Fixated on this? Hahaha wtf.. You sound like my emotionally charged wife. You seem to be fixated on me is much more accurate.

Blacksmith21

Whitehats already have it.

Enigmatic_Continuum

Huh? I've heard nothing about this. Do tell.

Blacksmith21

Notice my immediate downvoats?

Shizy

What's going on with this thread? It's like all the sickos have latched onto it!

Enigmatic_Continuum

Oh, yes! While white hats exist, I don't think there's any way to know what they have and when they'll use it, but we have to have faith that they are indeed working behind the scenes, or we might as well throw in the towel and give in to the psychopaths. The psychopaths are going to eat each other, and they've already started doing this.

Blacksmith21

I don't toss "white hat" out willy-nilly. This is very specific.. The Secret Army of Northern VA. TF/XXXXX. Others. This is MI. This is the tip of the spear. This is going to be revenge for Extortion 17 if nothing else. They have no idea what they've brought upon themselves. Damocles.

ESOTERICshade

I don't toss "white hat" out willy-nilly. This is very specific.. The Secret Army of Northern VA. TF/XXXXX. Others. This is MI. This is the tip of the spear. This is going to be revenge for Extortion 17 if nothing else. They have no idea what they've brought upon themselves. Damocles.

Could have fooled me. You guys have been making up stories about White Hats for months. None of the craziness you guys said would happen ever happened.

Enigmatic_Continuum

Then I'm going to have to bow out of this conversation. I know nothing about any secret army in Northern VA or Extortion 17. If you can't be more explicit, I cannot learn nor contribute.

Blacksmith21

Or you could do some basic research.

Enigmatic_Continuum

OK, now I'm getting a bit offended. I don't do basic research, and I'm more than happy to take 5 minutes of my time to provide someone with info I have to save them the time when I know they are most likely actively working on other research that I may not be privy to.

Blacksmith21

Don't be offending. I'm just saying, if you don't understand something, look it up. You have the sum of man's knowledge at your fingertips. Don't be afraid to use it.

Enigmatic_Continuum

Yeah, you're right. Sorry for my stupidity, laziness, and ignorance. After all, I just joined Voat yesterday and haven't conducted any of my own research as of yet. I'll try not to be such a dumbass in the future and will refrain from asking others to share their knowledge with me.

Blacksmith21

Don't be so sensitive.

RedditIsTheBest111

As a outsider to the conversation, I think you are just blowing smoke. Information that should be so easy for you to provide, comes off as out of reach for you. Instead of helping you just want to beat around and chat.

Blacksmith21

No I don't. Forcing information down someone's throat serves no ones interests.

Trust me, I have plenty of other people IRL I prefer to speak with.

Information is easy to provide. Intelligence is not. And it is often still classified.

Enigmatic_Continuum

Don't be so snarky and condescending.

rarepeeks

Reason you haven't heard about it because blacksmith made it up from thin air. Back when everybody like Hillary and Obama were "going to Gitmo any day" he also posted a picture of John Podesta. He tried to make the sly implication that it was a pic of Podesta in Gitmo. Another user recognized the picture and called his bluff on it so he dropped his Podesta in Gitmo ruse and slinked away.

Blacksmith21

No citation. Once you understand what our collection capabilities are, and who controls the reins, then you can comprehend how powerful "the machine" is.

Watch the first few episodes of Person of Interest. I'm not some TV LARPer, but that will give you a pretty good idea of domestic and OCONUS collection capabilities. The addition of AI into "selector analysis" allowed targeted surveillance to become very easy. Everything can be tracked, right down to DNA.

Viktor Litvenyenko - Dosed with alpha emitters which can be blocked with paper. Satellites tracked his path all over London. Just by his radioactive sweat. Almost 10 years ago.

There is some very serious tech out there.

Back to the original question. AI applications (Palantir) are used to relationship map and help create "target" lists. The predictive modeling already identified Joel Davis and proactively sucked everything of his existence out of the ether.

Can't explain it too much more simply.

Enigmatic_Continuum

Oh, trust me. I know exactly what you're talking about and it's much more powerful than we can imagine, even if we think we can. It's an exciting time to be alive, but very frightening as well.

"Why World War III will be fought on the internet" http://theweek.com/articles/441194/why-world-war-iii-fought-internet

Blacksmith21

That article is a bunch of propagandist-sounding hogwash.

Enigmatic_Continuum

I'm sorry to hear you think that. While it's mainly an opinion piece, keep in mind that it was published in 2015, and I think it sums things up pretty well as to what we're seeing now in regards to fake news, drones, leaked info, and civilian investigations and the creation of memes.

Blacksmith21

It's OK to disagree on the context of an article. It isn't the end of the world... ; )