So sorry, @MolochHunter - just saw that @Vindicator has stickied another post, and we unfortunately cannot sticky more than three at a time. @Vindicator said we cannot link it to the sidebar either, since we ran out of space there.

He is going to do a summary of the Excutive Summary posts (including yours), after he'll be back from his holiday.

Also, we can re-sticky your post in a couple of days when we'll take down one of those currently stickied.

Sure you can. ;-) @Vindicator might want to get back to us re linking your posts to the sidebar, he'll be back tomorrow I think.

No word of "super rich guy swoops in to buy all copies" such as they tried to do with "A conspiracy of Silence"?

😂

I don't have time to pore over the bill. Any chance of getting a link to the "headhunting" clause of the law?

Lawyers do defend guilty parties all the time but very few brag about it later.

This one -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.html

@MolochHunter , thanks for the great post!

Could you please add links here:

2011 Laura Silsby affair, in which Ms Silsby was convicted on a second consecutive attempt to alight across the Dominican border with 33 children without adequate attempts to locate their parents in earthquake ravaged Haiti.

Ms Silsby was extradited after personal intervention from the Clintons

...and Silsby was one of the gests at Chelsea’s wedding.

I will then remove the flair.

Thanks!

in lieu of a better flair option, I'm going to give this an 'IMPORTANT' flair just to get some eyeballs on it.

It's a horrid story. If you know it you won't forget it. She is a horrid person. Horrid.

Please let me know what "facts" you think are contained in that article. There's been about a million fact checks that debunk this. The rest of your post is straight up standard lies about Hillary Clinton.

This lie is straight up bonkers

In fact she values the rapist more and sees it only as an opportunity to further her career.

An opportunity to further her career? That's just ludicrous. She was appointed by a court because the defendant insisted on a female lawyer. She didn't take this case herself. She was ordered by a judge to take it. She didn't have the right to refuse this case.

This is the definition of a psychopath.

No, this is a fake character you created to rip down. You demonize her, give her zero benefit of any doubt, lie about the facts and then make this claim.

The truth of this case, is Hillary Clinton did not put this girl through anything, legal experts said she did nothing unethical and the reporter who interviewed her says she never laughed at the girl once. What this girl went through was not Hillary Clinton's doing. Clinton never questioned her and never had her questioned. It was the prosecutors who grilled her and eventually had her take a polygraph, because the prosecutors believed she wasn't telling the full story of what happened. In fact, you take Hillary Clinton out of this story and this poor woman's story doesn't change a whit.

Do you know of any females who would defend a child rapist that you knew was guilty in a case like this?

You have no idea how our criminal justice system works. Female lawyers defend clients all the time. The American Bar Association says "Defense counsel is essential to the administration of criminal justice" and says

Defense attorneys are ethically bound to zealously represent all clients, those whom they think will be justly found guilty as well as those whom they think are factually innocent.

If she didn't defend her client vigorously, he could appeal his conviction and have it overturned. It's called "appeal due to ineffective counsel." The American system is the government has to prove you are guilty and when you are found guilty, we can say you had a defense and a jury of your peers still found you guilty. This is a system of justice, not a system of tyranny. It's not a kangaroo court you find in dictatorships.

The part when she says she knew he was guilty was due to the fact he plead guilty. She specifically laughing at why polygraphs are not used as evidence. He passed his polygraph and later plead guilty.

For example this claim in the article is false, this "grueling court-ordered psychiatric examination" never took place and the girl never knew anything about this at the time.

Shelton said Clinton accused her during the case of 'seeking out older men', and demanded that the 12-year-old undergo a grueling court-ordered psychiatric examination to determine whether she was 'mentally unstable'.

Clinton filed a request and it was turned down. This exam never happened. A lawyer found the full case files after these news stories came out. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/11/the-facts-about-hillary-clinton-and-the-kathy-shelton-rape-case/?utm_term=.b4a33995e09a

But the court docket, unearthed by Pittsburgh attorney Norma Chase and for the first time made public, shows that one day after Clinton filed a request for psychiatric exam, it was denied by the judge. The court docket for July 28 says Clinton filed her motion for an exam. On July 29, it states: “Hearing on Motion for Psychiatric Examination — Motion denied. Defendant objects.” ( There is also no evidence that Clinton was responsible for arranging Shelton’s polygraph test. )

The questioning she experienced was on behalf of the prosecutor not Clinton. Clinton never got to question her at all and there was no cross examination and no trial.

Shelton said one of her worst memories of the case was being questioned repeatedly by appointed experts.

'It got so bad that I told my mom I wasn't going back, and whatever happened, happened,' said Shelton. 'It's sad that a 12-year-old had to go through what I had to go through, because for days I cried and cried and cried over it.'

Her worst memories have nothing to do with Clinton.

In fact, the victim in this case said in 2008 that she bore no ill will to Clinton would was just doing her job. The people who actually gave her grief in this case were the cops and the prosecutor because they didn't believe her story. This article is the most fact-filled article on the case. It originally came out in 2008. Here's what the woman said.

With all the anguish she’d felt over the case in the years since, there was one thing she never realized — that the lawyer for the man she reviles was none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton.

“I have to understand that she was representing Taylor,” she said when interviewed in prison last fall. “I’m sure Hillary was just doing her job.”........ ...she bears Hillary Rodham Clinton no ill will and was eager to read “Living History” — at least pages 72 and 73, which contain her case.

Hillary was court-appointed to defend this guy and legal ethics say you have to vigorously defend your client. It's part of our system for hundreds of years. It's a check on the government's awesome power to take away your liberty. Legal experts said she did nothing unethical. The guy got a lesser charge, because he the prosecutors had an extremely weak case and he got a plea deal. They didn't fully believe the girl, the cops lost the physical evidence connecting him with the crime and the girl's mother didn't want her to testify. 95% of violent crime convictions in this country are the result of a plea deal.

Shelton said she 'wasn't surprised' that Clinton has yet to express sympathy for the plight she went through as a victim.

This is false too. Clinton was not laughing at this woman. She called the case a terrible case on those very same tapes and said it inspired her to open the first rape hotline in Arkansas. She was laughing at things like the judge wouldn't let her hear evidence against her client because she was a woman. She never laughed about the girl. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/05/19/did-clinton-laugh-about-a-rapists-light-sentence-and-attack-sexual-harassment-victims/?utm_term=.8be93e8e1884

It's a lie because we know that Clinton used Epstein's plane.....that is in fact how they met. However there are no flight records showing Clinton flying to St Thomas.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-

This is actually what happened on the first seven flights Ghana: Clinton teamed up with Peruvian economist Hernando De Soto to help implement De Soto's initiative to grant title to the poor, so that Africans can use their farms, homes, and businesses as collateral for credit. In all of Africa, much of the land is held in common and controlled by tribal chieftains.

Nigeria:Clinton met with hundreds of political and educational leaders, discussing ways to modernize their government and fight against HIV/AIDS.

Rwanda and Mozambique: He visited AIDS clinics, discussed economic issues. He noted that Mozambique, before the devastating floods, had ranked among the top five countries in the world for economic growth for three consecutive years. In Rwanda, Clinton visited the genocide memorial. In a small village, he met a Tutsi woman who lost her husband and son in the genocide and a Hutu woman whose husband was charged with participating in the genocide. Both of them, he said, are working toward reconciliation and integration. He said that the hindrance has been politicians seeking aggrandizement and power, rather than with various groups divided by ethnicity.

South Africa: He met with a group called Young Life, comprising young people dedicated to working to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS. He met with Nelson Mandela to discuss advancing citizen participation. Already advancing the cause, South Africa will have the first foreign branch of Clinton's signature Americorps program and Clinton participated in a televised town hall meeting to discuss and publicize the program.

David Brock is very upset that his precious Hillary is being questioned. I feel bad for David.

Utter fucking bullshit. The IG report says nothing whatsoever about that. How demented do you have to believe that if the FBI covered up this crime, the IG report wouldn't actually um....devote a paragraph or two to this ?