Earlier I stated that this was a hoax fitting a pattern of other similar hoaxes ( excessive detail on points that dont matter by whicb to validate the claim - and - personal contact simultaneously.with all the bad guys) . Are-We-Sure pointed out earlier how much detail of the incident was recalled years later when the incident was of no significance to the witness at the time which iundermines credibility. I also expressed wonderment at how earnest these false witnesses are because I feel they believe their own lies, hence there is some degree of mental illness.

Witnesses who believe their own lies will be able to pass a lie detector test. So I remain unconvinced.

hi @ghost7 ,

thanks for sharing, but unfortunately this sub no longer accepts 'share a link' posts (Rule 6, please refer to the rules found in the sidebar.)

we ask you to please resubmit as a 'discuss' post, along with a brief description of its contents and relevance to pizzagate.

or alternatively you could repost, as is, to v/pizzagatewhatever

thanks!

Lie detectors are not a good measure of truth. There's a reason they're not definitive in court. A: if you know what you're doing you can cheat them, and B: if you truly believe what you're saying ("I know for a fact the earth is flat") you'll pass the test too. Don't know if either of those apply here but take polygraphs with a grain of salt

Here's his account of the night he met the cult group of NXIUM if you have not listened to it