think-

@LoveableSatan : I will remove the post now since it wasn't edited.

Judgejewdy

Amber is a witch whore.

ProfessionalCynic

Amber Tamblyn....seriously? DS was laughing when they made up that name.

sunajAeon

I'm suspicious of any star who worked for these hollyweird pedos, one commentor made a good point about what a star has to have seen and participated in to be a star-now where was Woods all these years? But having said that this is not proof, hearsay, its wrong to assail anyone as a pedo unless you have solid evidence

rickman

No James Wood doesn't get a free pass. It's perfectly reasonable to be disgusted by his behaviour and he's not alone. Many famous men of a certain age have lived through the 60s 70s and 80s when nobody batted an eyelid if they were seen with girls young enough to be their daughters. Thankfully society has changed and its not as tolerated anymore and these men get called out on not accepting they're no longer young men.

But its a different issue altogether. James Woods hits on a 16 year old. It's inappropriate, creepy, gross, whatever you want to call if if you find it offensive. His intentions are clear but its an open and honest pick up attempt. Has he been arrested for possessing videos of toddlers and babies being raped? Has he joked about wanting to do that? Has he made attempts to purchase young children to abuse? Not as far as I know.

I wish certain people would stop trying to muddy the waters by throwing around dumb shit like Roy Moore or this thing with James Woods. It's just a completely different issue and smacks of desperate attempt to move attention away from the truly sick.

3141592653

He did star in a movie about discrediting the mcmartin preschool victims. Not cool

Hortance

So Woods hit on a "mature looking" 16 year old? Kind of indicates he's NOT a pedo, IMO. A young-looking 18 year old would be a better indication.

This just demonstrates the inevitable progression from Pedowood:

  1. Silence. Then....
  2. "Pedophilia problem? We don't have a pedo problem." Now....
  3. "Look! All our accusers are pedos, too."

ClairesDeLuney

Goodness, I sure would love to have earned my downvoat privileges right about now! Bots & shills are slithering around like the vile snakes they are. Their evil nest has been shaken down. It's time to blast nothing but light 24/7 onto these pigs! Remember Q's recent post: "...false, 'violent' narrative push. Ask yourself, why?.."

Shizy

You seem suspicious too! You're on my radar.

ClairesDeLuney

Excuse me? I've been a voat reader for two years; became a registered member around six months ago. I may not comment or upvoat on a regular basis. However, that does not constitute shill or bot behavior.

153sdsd

James woods is cool, he is on our side, perez hillton and salon (I cant believe i have to say this) is not.

Sometimesineedhelp

I know this isn't popular here, but I can't get upset at "pedophiles" that hit on sexually mature young women. I think it's diluting the real issue when we pretend women of childbearing age are "children" because they aren't. I don't care about James Woods either way whatsoever, but as someone who got pregnant in high school at 16 (by another 16 year old) you aren't ever going to convince me it's the same & if you attempt to do so, I take everything else you say with less seriousness.

Vindicator

@LovableSatan , we require linked support for every major claim here on v/pizzagate , as I've already warned you in your other shitpost. Please provide support for "We are allowing James Woods to apparently "represent us" just like all the other celebrities who think they are above us," and "the fact that James Woods has a habit of picking up very young women". One bit of hearsay from "a lady who was 16 when she approached him" does not constitute either a "fact" or a "habit."

This is your second and last warning about honoring our submission requirements. It's also your last 24 Hour Grace flair.

@think- @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall

ESOTERICshade

These spammers are coming with some healthy upvotes too. I don't know if bots can do that but I guess its possible?

Vindicator

If you read the article from v/news I stickied, you would know they are working numerous alts and vote farming in numerous low profile subs, which has been under observation by multiple users for over a year.

Shizy

OP is a spamming shill!

Pizzalawyer

Amber liked older men just like Woods might have been enamored with a girl who probably grew up.quicker than most given her family's background in entertainment

She married David Cross who is 19.years older than her.

Leave James Woods alone.

Vindicator

Nice fact warfare, Pizzalawyer. Upvoated.

Baumalein

never ever is james woods a pedo

pixiesbitch

you do realise that to be a hollywood insider that is, to brush shoulders with the hollywood elite, that you would have gone to grandiose balls, you would have to have partaken in many orgies, probably orgies that involve children, or some form of child abuse. you do realise that, right?

Vindicator

You do realize he's been blacklisted for quite a while, right?

pixiesbitch

You do realise you’re a rude facetious twat, right? NO I did not know he had been blacklisted. But to think that makes him automatically exempt is naive and foolish.

Dig4Dutroux-Holland

Calling someone a rude twat is rude, twat.

pixiesbitch

obviously. it's not for nothing.

MAC712

Color me NOT SHOCKED that accusations like this will be forthcoming. (And not just about James Woods but likely Mel Gibson, Clint Eastwood and beyond). But since James Woods is such a conservative activist he is target zero. I’m going to hold my judgment about James Woods in this regard but generally he’s one of the smartest, most articulate, most logical minds in Hollywood. I kinda suspect a bit more old fashioned morality from him too - but we’ll see.

Pointyball

Salon.com?

derram

https://archive.fo/4Pvwg :

Perez Hilton - James Woods a pedophile? Color me not shocked!! | Facebook

https://archive.fo/T6akY :

In an open letter, Amber Tamblyn destroys James Woods for hitting on her when she was 16 | Salon.com


This has been an automated message.

anoncastillo

16 is the age of consent in many parts of the developed world. 16 year olds are generally a few years past puberty and well developed. Unlike fucking a child, preteen, or early teen girl, there is no significantly greater risk of causing injury or death when fucking a 16 year old. If he starts chasing girls younger than that, let us know. Until then @coopzy did nothing wrong.

AndrewBlazeIt

@LoveableSatan is part of a coordinated effort by spammers to dump on James Woods with no actual evidence.

salon.com

Case in point.