I think CPS has been talked about a lot on this sub but it is interesting to see another case of their overreach. I just had a thought. What if it was the goal of the elite to make American cities so unsafe that taking a dog for a walk would be grounds for CPS taking a child? Maybe I'm giving them too much credit but destruction of normal society does seem to be a re-occurring theme.
You just never know who is out there. In my neighborhood we have two registered kiddie rapists and I notice that some of them seem to have friends in weird places... I notice which cars they drive and where they work together. I notice the attitude that CPS people seem to have. In my life I've experienced knowing two horrible CPS workers and two good ones but I've read far more cases of the corrupt ones. There are always the apologists with an attitude problem who think they're right. Then there was the lady I spoke to in Illinois who seemed pissed I was reporting Greg Chism (Toy Freaks). I always wondered why the hell she seemed so upset.
@EffYouJohnPodesta
, please edit this post to clearly articulate how it is relevant to the sexual abuse of kids by the global elite (Rule 1).
Also, I'm getting sick of flairing your posts because you can't bother to do this stuff. You know what the submission requirements are. You aren't new. You've had plenty of help from the community in editing previously flaired posts -- many of them in the past few weeks. It's not fair to users who honor the community submission requirements, or to mods who have to constantly ask you to edit. Nor is it fair to the others whom we have had to ban for repeated disregard for subverse submission rules for us to keep giving you edit flairs.
Hi Vindicator, I provided a detailed explanation of why I was posting it within the thread but sorry it wasn't explicit enough. I'm sorry you felt that wasn't enough. I will edit it.
"To me this gets to a pretty crucial question of law which is why CPS even exists. They have in most places, completely anonymous reports, the ability to take your children with less than probable cause, the ability to terminate your rights with a standard of clear and convincing evidence / preponderance. You never get to find out who your accuser is for up to a year after a case is ruled out and possibly never otherwise, and they remove kids all the time in cases that have no criminal charges. If it doesn't rise to the level of criminal charges, the right to an attorney, etc. then it shouldn't be a case. Family courts operate without the absolute right to an appointed attorney. It's how the racket exists.
In adoption cases, the records are almost always sealed. So it's nearly impossible for anyone in the public to investigate what is happening."
▼ Factfinder2
The inescapable impression is that the goal of CPS is to make sure as many kids as possible are being abused.
Way too often to be happening by chance,
1) If kids are not being abused at home, CPS snatches and transfers them to abusers.
2) If they are being abused at home, CPS turns a blind eye.
▼ EffYouJohnPodesta
well-put
▼ IShallNotFear
I think CPS has been talked about a lot on this sub but it is interesting to see another case of their overreach. I just had a thought. What if it was the goal of the elite to make American cities so unsafe that taking a dog for a walk would be grounds for CPS taking a child? Maybe I'm giving them too much credit but destruction of normal society does seem to be a re-occurring theme.
▼ EffYouJohnPodesta
You just never know who is out there. In my neighborhood we have two registered kiddie rapists and I notice that some of them seem to have friends in weird places... I notice which cars they drive and where they work together. I notice the attitude that CPS people seem to have. In my life I've experienced knowing two horrible CPS workers and two good ones but I've read far more cases of the corrupt ones. There are always the apologists with an attitude problem who think they're right. Then there was the lady I spoke to in Illinois who seemed pissed I was reporting Greg Chism (Toy Freaks). I always wondered why the hell she seemed so upset.
▼ sore_ass_losers
Wilmette = nice north shore suburb, no shooting.
▼ EffYouJohnPodesta
yeah, I would never let my kid do what this mom did, but I can see how some people think it's safe
▼ sore_ass_losers
What kind of dog it was might be relevant.
▼ EffYouJohnPodesta
good point
▼ Vindicator
@EffYouJohnPodesta , please edit this post to clearly articulate how it is relevant to the sexual abuse of kids by the global elite (Rule 1).
Also, I'm getting sick of flairing your posts because you can't bother to do this stuff. You know what the submission requirements are. You aren't new. You've had plenty of help from the community in editing previously flaired posts -- many of them in the past few weeks. It's not fair to users who honor the community submission requirements, or to mods who have to constantly ask you to edit. Nor is it fair to the others whom we have had to ban for repeated disregard for subverse submission rules for us to keep giving you edit flairs.
@think- @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall
▼ EffYouJohnPodesta
I've edited it and sent you a message.
▼ Vindicator
Thank you for the edit, EYJP. Much better. I have removed the flair.
▼ EffYouJohnPodesta
thank you
▼ EffYouJohnPodesta
Hi Vindicator, I provided a detailed explanation of why I was posting it within the thread but sorry it wasn't explicit enough. I'm sorry you felt that wasn't enough. I will edit it.
"To me this gets to a pretty crucial question of law which is why CPS even exists. They have in most places, completely anonymous reports, the ability to take your children with less than probable cause, the ability to terminate your rights with a standard of clear and convincing evidence / preponderance. You never get to find out who your accuser is for up to a year after a case is ruled out and possibly never otherwise, and they remove kids all the time in cases that have no criminal charges. If it doesn't rise to the level of criminal charges, the right to an attorney, etc. then it shouldn't be a case. Family courts operate without the absolute right to an appointed attorney. It's how the racket exists.
In adoption cases, the records are almost always sealed. So it's nearly impossible for anyone in the public to investigate what is happening."