Thanks very much for the reply - that question had actually been on my mind for a year and a half. I remember reading somewhere, I think in one of the MSM articles, that Alefantis said that the walk in cooler was at another location (that is, not at Comet) but didn't specify where, or if it was at a property he owned. I wonder where it actually is?

I remember seeing a video in the early days of Pizzagate which showed Alefantis being questioned on the street outside Comet by a couple of guys who had enlarged prints of his Instagram posts. They had the Kill Room picture, and when they confronted him with it he kind of grimaced and turned away, and walked up the street without saying anything. When he came back the subject was changed and he never addressed the Kill Room question, though he did calmly answer questions about the girl with the tape and other things. This is the only time I can think of where Alefantis looked nervous or uncomfortable when being publicly questioned about Pizzagate. Segments of this video still exist, but the part where he responds to the Kill Room picture seems to have been scrubbed from YouTube, and I haven't seen it since 2016.

For instance, in this video https://hooktube.com/watch?v=gKTiUaloDDA at 2.38, it sounds like they're just about to ask him about the Kill Room but the video cuts to another segment before the question is finished.

It's a perfect example of the cultural disconnect at the heart of pizzagate. It's clearly a joke and doesn't exist and Pizzagaters not only take it literally, they've been trying to will it into existence ever since.

You are aware that you are engaging the local shill, right?

Who used this label? And where is the evidence of that?

This is partially my problem you are starting with assumptions.

What the fuck does this mean? The server from Benghazi? WTF does this mean?

It's not all that mysterious. If you substitute the somewhat clearer phrase "because of" for the word "from," it's obvious what FBI Anon is talking about. When the State Department was asked to turn over Clinton's emails relating to Benghazi, they only turned over eight of them. Then it eventually transpired that she was operating a private server, and after several years of delay, she turned over 33,000 emails from that while wiping the rest. From those emails it became apparent that she was engaging in "pay for play" and other corrupt practices relating to the CF. (Well, again technically there was other evidence apart from the emails that helped to establish that point, such as her engagements calendar which showed that the majority of her time that wasn't spent on other government employees was spent on CF donors. But the emails were essential to that finding as well.)

You can play dumb about the meaning of the word "from" and you can express astonishment about the "pay for play" allegations, but these are utterly uncontroversial points. They wouldn't normally merit being called a conspiracy theory, and they stand up quite well regardless of what anyone thinks about Pizzagate. There is, after all, an active FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation right now.

FBI Anon: She has SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war.

Clinton Hack Lawyer: *The emails didn't mention CIA or drones or any names or details because the officials were talking on their "low side" nonsecure emails so they put no real information in them. That's it that's the most dangerous thing on her computer.

Well, yes and no. You've gone over the email chains in many previous threads, and I won't debate the technical issue of how they were classified because (a) you've largely gotten that right, and (b) it's irrelevant.

FBI Anon's response to Question 1-007 is particularly unrevealing and unhelpful, which I imagine is why you focused on that one. Here's another one where FBI Anon made a claim that I have never been able to verify:

FBI Anon 1-049: All I can tell you about the SAPs is HRC had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors. Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason.

As I said, I don't know how FBI Anon knew this, or even if it was true. He very clearly threw in some misinformation and misdirection just to protect himself. I wouldn't waste any time defending the view he expresses of Jews and the Holocaust, for example. When he is asked if he "named the Jew" and he replies "The nose knows," he's almost certainly just fucking with /pol/. Likewise when he tells us that "life exists elsewhere in the galaxy" or "deporting all blacks would be a great thing". But in dozens of his responses, he states his main point very clearly:

FBI Anon 1-030: My message to you and everyone on this board is do not get distracted by Clinton’s e-mails. Focus on the Foundation. All of the nightmarish truth is there. The e-mails will pale in comparison.

FBI Anon 1-040a and 1-040b I will put it to you this way. You have three choices: A) Turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war. The civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences out government, and a civil war begins. B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of public opinion, so the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash. C) You do nothing and watch the unstable political climate to gauge how you will respond. I am confident if Trump wins she will be going to jail.

Here's the main thing that FBI Anon did not say in that first session: That the biggest "nightmare" he was trying to alert us to was child sex trafficking and the CF's involvement in it. He waited until his second AMA to delve into that, for example Question 2-079.

FBI Anon 2-079: Sex rings are popular in all governments, but pedophilia is primarily in British parliament & Saudi Arabia, and that’s why HRC and BC love foreign donors so much. They get paid in children as well as money. Dig deep and you can find it. It will sicken you.

So my broad reply to your nit-picking is that the current cover-up was of the Clinton Foundation's corruption and in particular its child sex trafficking, and that it started when Bill met Loretta on the tarmac.

Clinton Hack Lawyer: So the cover is Seth Rich plus tarmac meeting and what else? What's your best case?

Heh. You probably already realized this, because while you're something of a one-trick pony, you're not stupid. But you're not getting my best case. We've been well past that point for months now. You'll see my best case when it's part of an indictment, or when Glenn Greenwald explains it to everyone on The Intercept . Confronting the shills on Voat was a very, very useful exercise, but it has become mostly played out. As I've said several times, I don't come here in search of information or to convince the handful of people who aren't sockpuppets. I just come to keep you all looking over your shoulders.

However, if you want to keep cherry-picking questions that you think are safe for your side, in hopes of learning something, be my guest. I can play that game.

https://realitycallsshow.com/banned-from-youtube-james-alefantis-instagram-account-images-pizzagate/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BOqd9OZA2TJ/

Really? That's your best reply? LOL! Like I said, low on the Totem pole.