Childline Founder Esther Rantzen Upset that Google will not Censor Those Criticising her for her Alleged Complicity in Covering Up Elite Child Sexual Abuse ( pizzagate )

submitted by Podge512

PG related as it is widely suspected that Rantzen is a gatekeeper and her 'Childline' was a method of identifying and filtering victims of elite child rapists. Moreover, she was informed of her friend Jimmy Savile's in 1994 and did nothing about it. She now pleads the Leon Brittain defence, claiming to remember nothing of being told about her friend's rampant child sexual abuse.

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t14780-esther-rantzen#393221

sore_ass_losers

Here's an interesting summary "Esther Rantzen and the Paedophiles":

https://www.scribd.com/doc/256503576/ESTHER-RANTZEN-and-the-paedophiles

(I'm familiar with one of the items: Child star Ben Fellows said Rantzen had invited her to a party in the New Forest area. He said he was propositioned by adults there. Here it claims ER invited BF to her own party.

I wonder, since ER does have a home in the New Forest. (As my linked document mentions, there was even a pedophile incident in her swimming pool and a man arrested, while she was away.)

Anyway Fellows made some claims about a Sir Kenneth Clarke also. It's interesting that the anti-child abuse website Exaro disputed his claims. BF was charged with 'perverting the cause of justice' but found innocent.)

SearchVoatBot

This submission was linked from this v/pizzagate comment by @sore_ass_losers .

Posted automatically (#9737) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here .

sore_ass_losers

Where do you get the information in the title? From your link I see she is making a comeback as a consultant on some old show she had.

It's very curious that the Aanirfan blog just disappeared from blogspot, which is owned by Google. Did you see my post?:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2847088

At first I thought 'blog removed' meant Google had deleted the whole blog. Perhaps some sort of 'deplatforming' censorship, but especially onerous since years of research is now gone. Aangirfan wasn't right wing but anti-Deep State.

From your headline you could theorize perhaps it was Rantzen's people put pressure on Google to delete. Rantzen popped up regularly on the blog as a likely suspect.

One mystery though is the pre-2014 version of the blog is still live. Why not censor that also, especially since it contains many Rantzen allegations. So now my third theory is Aang and Irfan themselves deleted the blog under pressure. The pre-2014 stuff became inaccessible and was abandoned due to a lost password, I believe. If you lose your password and your contact info is expired, you are SOL. So they would be unable to delete this material.

My first voat-autistic impulse was to post a bunch of archived blog entries re: ER and others. But I consider A & I allies and until I hear what happened, perhaps it's better to keep things low key. The A & I blog entries link to original sources and information about ER and others is available elsewhere on the Net.

I'm going to cut & paste most of this on the other submission.

siegnagel

Ah good old (((Esther))) best pals with Jimmy. Vile horseface harlot.

Far2Long2

Who killed Jill Dando?

turitelle

from the forum

Re: Esther Rantzen

Post by sar Today at 11:23 

[@JimbobJones](https://voat.co/u/JimbobJones) wrote:
Would I be right suggesting Esther Rantzen claims none of the kids abused by Jimmy Savile ever phoned childline? Not ONE of them? . . . Ever? None of them accused him direct to childline?
I am sure some of them MUST have. Then you must ask what happened to that info. Was it "sat upon" if so who had the wherewithall to put the lid on it?
I agree the "charity" sounds bogus and Esther Ratzen sounds like a gatekeeper to me. I can picture a scenario in my head . . . "Now, Esther. You know how we got you those primetime TV shows, and made you the nations darling? Well, we want you to do this little job for us."

...childline was an early warning system for peterfiles. It gathered intel to protect them from investigation. It wasn't set up to help the vulnerable it was set up to help abusers access them and cover up their activity. Any one that facilitated this should be charged.