Vindicator

@fogdryer , this literally meets NONE of the submission rules. You obviously know that. Are you trolling for a ban? You know we have to ban users that exhibit a repeated disregard for the submission rules. Consider this your warning.

Removing per Rule 4.

@think- @EricKaliberhall

IShallNotFear

It sounds like something worth looking in to. Sometimes when people ask, they really aren't sure. Since you didn't even list a source, I think you already know the answer to your question.

WalnutSauceGoat

Where’s the link? Are you deliberately mocking the moderators, or are you a millennial?

fogdryer

Neither

carmencita

This could be tricky but I think you are smart enough to figure out how to do it. Would be a really great and informative post.

fogdryer

I just gave it to NOM.....

carmencita

Good Idea since the idea was a good one.

NOMOCHOMO

Yes. I have noticed this same pattern with the Freemasonic group connected with JA family.

Ownership of hospitals, elder-care facilities/low cost housing, and summer camps

Just like shriners hospitals. They run "good" "charitable" businesses, but it also gives them access to vulnerable populations

fogdryer

Holy cow

carmencita

Whoops. You beat me to the punch. Almost what I would say. It certainly is worth it, but if it is about the elderly it won't be allowed. Summer camps yes, but the elderly we throw under the bus even though Hillary was connected to a bone business in Cali. Maybe if it can be connected to Children it can be posted.

NOMOCHOMO

If you can prove children visit the elderly/the elders are primary guardians, Mods might allow it

carmencita

Great Connection! Also many are care takers of their Grand Children. If they are not well cared for the Children will end up in CPS. Hopefully @fogdryer will post.