drmckoy

I believe it's called: PUBIC AFFAIRS.

FireWalkWithPodesta

So it's basically Hamsa with a pedo swirl. Hamsa is sometimes associated with Goddess Tanit. They used to sacrifice children for Tanit. Yet another coincidence?!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamsa

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanit

kazza64

i had a look down the rabbit hole with this one ...... all i can say is that you'd think michelle would have advised them that their logo is a recognised fbi pedo symbol and that it might attract the wrong element to their organisation ..... being the first lady means she is still privy to cia intel to this day so her and barack know the significance of symbolism .... the ceo was installed in august this year so maybe its a PR campaign in line with the release of her book ..... like she really gives a shit

Z11Mama

It's not about what the symbol means and how to prove what definition is real. If you were going to create a logo you would research the meaning of symbols you want to use. When you see that the native symbol (has anyone verified this?) looks like a pedo symbol you know that you don't want that so you choose something else. Unless you want people to believe it actually could be true.

jervybingly

Goddam tranny

new4now

The Public Allies logo draws on Native American tradition to illustrate the impact individuals can have on their world. The handprint depicted in the logo represents the mark that people leave on their communities and on the people they touch in the course of their lives. The red swirl stands for the energy and idealism that drive people to serve their communities. The seven rays refer to a philosophy regarding the interconnectedness of the generations—the belief that an individual living today has been influenced by the three preceding generations, and will go on to leave a legacy affecting the three generations to go eat.

this is how it is explained

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Allies

carmencita

What a white washing of a pedo symbol. What a crock.

MAGARunner

Well, at least they are creative in their "explanation" of the logo. I don't believe it for a second though.

new4now

me neither