CDAN Blind - Actress has Assange's Encryption Key in Event of His Death ( pizzagate )

submitted by Cleareyes

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2019/05/blind-item-11_31.html

So Pamela Anderson has it and it can only be used in the event he dies basically? I'm guessing she's being protected by someone and she mainly lives in France these days apparently.

Gothamgirl

Thank you.

PrepareForWar

Jesus, I hope Assange wasn't stupid enough to put his life in that hepatitis ridden whore's hands.

Vindicator

Is someone trying to put a hit on Pamela Anderson? Sheesh.

Cleareyes

ooh that could be it! I'm not sure what to think on this one

Voateringforlife

She cannot be trusted-she probably had a hand in his undoing.

Cleareyes

hmm interesting, thanks! Guess we'll have to see, not sure what else to think or where it'll go from here in that case

theooeht

Don't believe this for a second.

Enty's going off the deep end.

Lansing-Michigan

Am noticing a gate keeper pattern on voat. The vatican , through the mafia , runs enormous numbers of global child sex trafficking rings. ... Yet, Kevin Annett , who busted up a ritual child sacrifice in the basement of a cathedral in Canada, is barely mentioned. And he has taken them on for it as well as taking on queen , anglican church and canadian govt for the same thing.....gate keepers are out full force again. . Enty has never been sued despite some insider unbelievable knowledge of hollywood child rapes on a large scale. Names names and has quite a following. The movement will continue despite those who cast constant shade.

theooeht

Interesting.

And to be effective, you have to have some info correct. Otherwise, you have no credibility which is what enty does.

If we need proof of your assertion, we can only look at the few cases where justice has prevailed. Weinstein, NXIVM, and R. Kelly are three examples. Does anyone see these stories across the front pages? They all but disappeared. You really have to dig to find them, but Meghan Markle's ''nasty'' comment? Splashed EVERYWHERE! And a misquoted rebuttal from our POTUS.

Unfortunately, I agree with you which is sad. There isn't anybody to follow ... well, no one at the forefront. I think only Judicial Watch is actually breaking through w/solid evidence, but it's all buried. And there are a few people on Twitter that I follow, but those accounts have like ... twelve people.

Cleareyes

what would be the purpose of posting that? Any ideas? How would that benefit him? I dont think "going crazy" is sound logic in this case.

theooeht

Well, the thing is that enty has gone and posted false blinds before. One that sticks out is the Henley blind. Remember the teen witnessed her friend die? Then she grew up and married this guy running for Governor of CA and indictments would be brought because the candidate was running because of what his wife knew? Yeah, BULLSHIT! Complete BULLSHIT!

Now if you look above, somebody advanced the theory that the Q crowd has taken over enty's blog. And the above examples does parallel with Q's obviously false posts like As the World Turns Agnes Nixon and the (then) upcoming Emmy Awards. Was supposed to be a yuge announcement. sputter ... sputter ... nothing happens. And then there was RFK, Jr. and the ''mass'' indictments that never materialized, so these follow the same lines except that enty was upset about info that turned out to be false? Think that's what it was. I mean, can you imagine Skankles faking that she was upset about Benghazi or something? Or how about Vince Foster? ''OH, VINCE! I MISS YOU SO MUCH!'' Yeah, no. Soooooo I don't think so.

If we stick with the original blinds, a lot of them were bullshit, but with the Pamela Anderson thing, I think it was Pammie-pooh who got the story posted. She's very proactive in getting her name out there, and God bless her, she does have Assange's ear. So why would she do that? PR? Maybe. Was she trying to protect him? After all, if the Cabal Crew thinks someone has the code, it's really not going to help to get rid of Assange, is it? So IF they were planning on getting rid of Assange, they'd have to get rid of whoever has the code. Now nobody but an idiot would think Assange gave the code to Pammie. Might as well give it to Stormy Daniels while he's at it (and Daniels is another very wrong post by the Q crowd). So maybe it's mutli-layered to: (1) Make enty look stupid; (2) for Pammie to telepraph that she's trying to ''get'' the code (Hey, Assange babykins! I know you gave the code to Bubba, but you really need a backup in case Bubba forgets that big string of numbers), or (3) telegraphing the she knows who has the code! In other words, hey don't worry, momma can get her sticky little hands on the code.

But the thing that gets me, and I haven't seen this mentioned anywhere, is how healthy Assange used to look. Now I know the stories are he hasn't seen a doctor, but he looked great right up until the time his communications with the outside world got cut off and not before. Now all of a sudden, he's grown a beard and and hasn't had a haircut, etc., etc. That was March 2018. Is it possible to go downhill that quickly? Yes, if there's something serious going on. But the video he put out before communications seemed to indicate he was walking around quite freely with the use of disguises.

No doubt Pammie is an asset. She was Hef's fav and Hef was undoubtedly CIA hence all the listening devices and opportunities for blackmail.

If I had to guess, I'd say she put out the fake info to communicate that she access to the code.

Cleareyes

Enty has also brought up stuff that happened. he broke a some scandals before they came out in the news. Mixed bag so i am unsure myself, maybe it would be different if i caught the blinds everyday but i missed a lot there i know. Maybe someone who followed that site more has something to weigh in. A bit of the examples you brought up i missed it myself (RFK, Agnes) so can't comment on something i wasn't there to see, will have to check it out more and come back to discuss i guess.

Very good questions on the pam issue, on this one i don't know what to think yet

theooeht

Yeah, every time her name gets mentioned in connection with Assange, I break out in hives.

I wish I could send him an amulet as protection against succubi.

Cleareyes

Amulet? Succubi are demons and only God can effectively protect you against them.

Isaiah 3:1 In that day the Lord will take away the finery of the anklets, the headbands, and the crescents; the pendants, the bracelets, and the scarves; the headdresses, the armlets, the sashes, the perfume boxes, and the amulets;

Isaiah 2:6 “They are full of superstitions from the East; they practice divination like the Philistines and clasp hands with pagans”

theooeht

Thanks for the clarification, but ...

It was a joke.

Cleareyes

okay great :) have a good day!

1031grnis

How reputable is that site?

Onetime1

Might be an opportune moment for me to chime in re your query "how reputable is that site?"

Completely my opinion only, but I feel the CDAN site has been bought out/taken over by the Q group and is one - of several - channels with which to get information out to the wider public.

Victory Of The Light Twitter account strikes me as another.

It would not surprise me that numerous other outlets never "got legs" and remain in obscurity.

If the original Enty continues to publish moderately scandalous, mostly gossipy tidbits which are interspersed with mind blowing data of the darkest kind, emanating from the Q group, then an effective mechanism is established to slow walk information that the public would otherwise ignore if it were to be dumped en masse on an uninformed populace.

If you all are unaware, we have been engaged in a ferocious Information War for sometime now.

Political divides are apt to be bridged when abominations against children - as just one example - are put into the public domain with irrefutable evidence validating that the evil has been/is taking place.

1031grnis

Thanks for the info.

letsdothis3

If you all are unaware, we have been engaged in a ferocious Information War for sometime now.

It's also a Disinformation and Propaganda War. Be careful.. you're playing with chess here, not chequers checkers.

TrustTheTruth

What is The Truth that NONE of them will ever Share?

We are the reason why Q was created.

Why?

theooeht

UpVoat for you. I like the way you think,but there is one compelling piece of evidence that would contradict this.

The JohnDoe account on twitter has been rapacious in going after and RT'ing a reporter covering the NXIVM trial. There was also an emotional breakdown that entylawyer had over a piece of info that wasn't true? I'm trying to remember here, but he really took it to heart and closed his account down for a few days.

Him/her being so squarely in telling the truth and getting the truth out about NXIVM doesn't jibe with this being taken over by the Q crowd.

Nor does the motional outburst.

Cleareyes

They've posted blinds that were revealed to be true. They have posted blinds that haven't happened as well (publicly known about anyway). They post stuff that supports a lot of what we talk about here, hollywood pedos etc. They've also posted a couple things that implicated trump as one of them (i remember an IMDB pedo list being one). They could be playing the disinfo/protect their ass card there too. Lots of hollywood insiders read that site, so it could also be a tactic to shake the tree or cause panic>mistakes. Some of the guys enty (site operator) says are good guys in hollywood are sketchy so kind of hard to put a finger on but the info provided and insider comments on the blinds can be very revealing at the end of the day.

1031grnis

I'll start following them for the heck of it.