Glad to see you taking such interest in my posting history. Unfortunately, there is not enough for you to make a full-time career out of it so you will need to find another occupation.

As for "spreading fake news", don't be one of the shoutdown crowd. Totalitarians are not cool.

Sanger is free to defend himself, and his access to the bigger and louder propaganda forums is much greater than mine. He doesn't need you to defend him.

Our job here is to detect the hidden and highly guarded corruption of pedophilia, not guard the reputations of public figures who cast themselves as heroes. "Actual evidence" is precisely the thing that is hard to come by since pedophiles work so diligently to cover their tracks and utilize all the high powered tools of government and technology to do so.

Given that it is the strategy of some pedophiles to give themselves public cover by endorsing charities and loudly denouncing child abuse, etc., Sanger's public declarations should be suspect. Remember this guy? https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-says-columbia-student-who-campaigned-against-sexual-violence-had-child-porn-enticed-minor

I also observe the very calculated and artificially sincere tenor of his recent posts. Another big red flag.

And why, after decades of scandal and the well-known associations between big-tech, government, military intelligence, and media and their the deeply suspicious links to pedophilia rings is Sanger just coming out now with surprise and shock? Yet another big red flag.

We'll see in the end what team he's playing for.

As per my exchange with SandHog above, I think Larry's "awakening" is a bit suspicious. While most of us think the attention his higher profile persona can give to the topic of Pizzagate/pedophilia is a positive thing, that does not mean that Larry himself should be automatically exculpated.

Some would like to cast him as a hero now that he seems aligned with our cause. But I argue that his career and past associations entitle him to greater scrutiny. The tenor of his recent Twitter postings only increases my suspicions. They are strongly contrived and do not read like the average thoughts of a concerned citizen with genuine empathy, but instead as carefully crafted comments intended to convince others that he is genuinely surprised and concerned. In other words, it reads really, really fake. (Reread for yourself and see if you don't sense this.)

Maybe he's being genuine and simply does not have a good grasp of natural language or the normal emotional responses of average people (which would not be uncommon for someone with Asperger's for example, which many intelligent people suffer from, such as Bill Gates). But given his familiarity with digital media/communications/etc., I strongly doubt this. Instead it looks like he is awkwardly trying to mimic what he thinks would be the feelings of normal people to the discovery of Satanic pedophilia networks in the highest halls of power. (It's possible Larry even had help from a PR firm to craft his Tweets.)

I think an obvious explanation for this would be that he is trying to give himself cover for possible association with bad actors. This doesn't necessarily mean he is a pedophile himself. But it suggests to me he at least knows he's been around and had business dealings with bad people, and now needs to definitively distance himself. So still a good guy in this scenario. But not a moral beacon either.

But aside from his comments in 2010 about the Wikipedia forum possibly harboring pedophilia groups, Larry has remained silent on the topic ever since. Meanwhile, the rest of us have been alerted to the situation for many years (Epstein was first sent to prison in 2008), especially awakened when Pizzagate broke in 2016, wringing our hands and shouting to anyone who would listen. So where was Larry's shock and concern during this time? Only once one of the bad guys gets murdered in prison does Larry decide to register his concern and social obligation to root out evil. Strange, no?

So you have to ask, does Larry now fear for his own life, and hence his loud Twitter production? Or is he fearing his own indictment? If so, he would not be alone in trying to get ahead of the coming exposure and prosecution that Trump's DOJ is bringing. But is he an actual offender? Or an unwitting accomplice? Or a genuinely concerned citizen? We don't know.

I of course would be delighted if Larry were indeed a white night and legitimate advocate and now uses his notoriety and contacts to expose the guilty. But his actions suggest to me a different situation.

In terms of Larry's looks, well clearly there is no common look to pedophiles. My comment was a bit extreme. Larry just looks like a garden variety nerd. I am instead keying off of Larry's facial expression/emotional response, which when viewed in light of his Twitter postings, timing, and past associations, makes me deeply suspicious of him. This is intuition working overtime. But in a world where hard facts and evidence of nefarious evil are in short supply, making subtle connections and insights is our most valuable skill.

Of course. My only point is that I think Larry himself deserves special investigation.