i read this article and it sounded sort of ‘off’ to me : https://www.newsweek.com/getty-fire-center-museum-art-protection-los-angeles-1468196

Seems rather odd that a fire has happened every time there’s an intentional black out.

Fire risk is ostensibly the reason they've given for the intentional blackouts, so it's not that odd.

I read a news report on Twitter that the fire started next to I-405. The mayor sounds eerily similar to French officials after the Notre Dame fire:

During a press conference, Garcetti said the fire was not caused by an encampment or by someone without housing.

The mayor said investigators were making "good progress'' in determining the cause. They were looking at multiple possibilities.

Monday, LAFD arson investigators along with Los Angeles Department of Water and Power crews were inspecting a power pole along Sepulveda Boulevard in the general area where the blaze started. Terrazas confirmed that crews have identified the fire's point of origin just off the 405 Freeway near Sepulveda Boulevard.

Investigators were also looking at a broken tree branch with a charred end that was on the ground along Sepulveda just south of the Skirball on the west side. The branch was set aside on the ground surrounded by cones.

The Getty itself is reporting it is completely safe from the fires. A perusal of Twitter on the topic shows a massive push of climate "crisis" propaganda, though, including stories about the poor illegal housekeepers and gardeners who showed up to work in evacuation zones because they "weren't notified not to come", as well as the poor prison inmates forced to help fight the fires.

That place is a fortress. Fire could sweep right up the hill and over the Center and the only damage would be soot on the marble.

If it burns down, it will be arson.

Part of the tunnel network, Seattle to San Fran down to Long Beach, then San Diego to Pheonix to the Zoro Ranch. Then down to Ol' Mejico. and of course beyond. Think Little St. James on a global scale.