Qanon drop #3632 links to this image showing classified SECRET document bullet point #5. In it the exact words "correct the record" are stated, and it is suggested that "Maybe it's time for an offense as well as a defense".

The full text:

The Agency's posture toward the media is basically defensive, reactive and tongue-tied. What we say is: "no comment:; "that disclosure was wrong and outrageous." Next we wring our hands, send emissaries out to brief key people in the Administration and Congress and correct the record, then hunker back awaiting the next blow. Maybe it's time for an offense as well as a defense and an attempt to get things in better balance. Here are some personal thoughts as to do's and don'ts on this score.

This is a plan to create something. With this CIA document, dated 8 June 1984 , one wonders if this was used to guide Brock in creating his CTR, and possibly in previous iterations of similar projects.

Given the EXACT same wording, I'd say it's worth looking into; Brock and his CTR could be CIA.

For those of you that will say this isn't breaking news, tell me what this is. . Try this one.

Rules checklist:

1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities.

1) Correct the Record - Relevant

2) CTR - Relevant

3) Brock - Relevant

4) CIA - Relevant

2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link.

Linked to Qanon drop, image, archive of cia.gov PDF file... I think we're good here.

2: If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources.

I didn't.

2: If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them.

Opinions:

1) Brock's CTR is a coincidence -> explanation -> same exact wording and function.

2) This is a plan to create something -> explanation -> literally suggesting creating an offensive measure in the text of the document/image

3) it's worth looking into -> explanation -> exact same wording and function

2: Avoid baseless speculation.

Nothing baseless at all.

2: ALL posts must include at least one link.

Multiple links.

3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.

I cannot think of a more succinct and accurate title. Brock, CTR, and CIA are all directly relevant to pizzagate. Come to think of it, so is Q.

3: EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).

Each link is explained. "tell me what this is" and "Try this one" are sources suggesting this is new information, and as such worth posting as BREAKING.

4, 5, and 6, are not applicable. This is not Meta, it is not NSFW, and is not a link post.

Personal note:

I do hope @shewhomustbeobeyed , @heygeorge , @EsotericShade , and the rest of you are having a wonderful day. I sure am!