fogdryer

Yep they go back a long way

human_2000

Why does this photo look fake?

swordfish69

Royal agents.

Truthseeker3000

Go to Fergies social media and look at her latest post and statement about Andrew, she’s standing by him as if he’s innocent!! Talking about all he has done for “The Monarchy”. Beatrice and Eugenie are both ritual abuse royals look at the date of birth the numbers always matter. They also put on their own little show wearing the hats as protest at Harry’s wedding which was all over the news. They, especially the red headed bug eyed one, have turned into royals in every sense of the word. As children I feel sorry for their abuse and growing up with a pedofile father but now they are fully into the occult, even wearing Kabbalah bracelets at one point. Fergie is a self proclaimed witch which she said on her social media and promoted a book about witches. They all promote children’s charities which is alarming in itself. Don’t let them fool you, the daughters are not innocent either.

ThrowMeAVoat

The date was chosen because Beatrice, who is fifth in line to the Throne, was born at 8.18pm on 8/8/1988.

Always with these dates. WTF. I'm even highly suspicious that Princess Beatrice was actually born on the day and time stated...

Pizzatemp420

What’s with the blurriness under epstein’s chin? Gives a shopped feeling to the image. Also, what’s with the out of place military uniform? This really feels like a pic of someone else with his head attached.

rickman2

Public photos. Everyone knows about this. Beatrice and Eugene are actually two of the most decent royals. I feel sorry for them for having a father like Prince Andrew.

2017Fallout

Just posted a couple of lunks to remind us of Prince Charles and Jimmy Savile and the pedo Bishop.

2017Fallout

Royals need to hope that the Andrew scandal does not reignite the scandal regarding future king Charles and Jimmy Saville or his pedo vicar. They could end up with major Hewitt's sun Harry on the throne. At least he only dressed as a Nazi.

argosciv

If you've already seen the initial but not the edits, @Vindicator & @EricKaliberhall , changes have been made here which include speculative material that does otherwise speak for itself.

Happy to move said material to a comment, or move it to a pgw submission, or this whole submission to pgw, if you wish.