[x] doubt.¨Allow child pornography"

I wish people used the words they find and not change them in an agenda pushing manner. Even if I agree with the agenda. It makes everything you show less acceptable for people not on your page. (yet)

I'm sure you feel the same way if somebody would post this with "Twitter finally regonising art is harmless" or some shit.

If it does not promote good, but advances evil, it is not art. Objectifying and humiliating children is evil.

voat.co / v / pizzagate / 3614050 Related.

Well, come on, everybody can agree on what is "artistic" and subjective. It's simple.

Fuck off, that's illegal!

Imagine if they gave the same leniency to artistic depictions of the truth.

For those who'd rather go directly to the source instead of a May 11th 2020 article, which is itself based on a newspunch article from December 2019, on a religious site acting as though it's a brand new policy change, here is twitter's media policy: https://archive.is/4C3gp#selection-883.0-919.2

It is also worth noting that the language seen has been in place since at least Oct 2019, having changed some time between May 15th 2019 and Oct 15th, 2019 . So it isn't exactly a new change at all.

Interestingly, in the May 2019 archive, the policy reads:

Media containing adult content is not permitted within live video, profile or header images.

But that explicit mention pertaining to live video is no longer present in the current policy.

I've no doubt that sick fucks will be seeking to exploit the current policy, but as said, this isn't some new revelation.

Just send this to law enforcement and they could order Twitter to shut it down.