Thoughts on John Lennon? Suspicious postcard. ( pizzagate )

submitted by bullzeye

I was going through my John Lennon "Imagine" box set book and came across this postcard which he sent to his PR guy Elliot Mintz in 1978.

https://imgur.com/a/UszH3Sr

The postcard, depicting the young actress from "Lolita" and another image of a young girl, immediately struck me as odd. Then the caption, cryptically reading "just a thought" immediately got my pizzagate-senses tingling.

Is John Lennon or are any of the other Beatles known to be "baddies"? I read an unsourced story of The Beatles going to an underage sex party with Jimmy Saville, but it just seems so far fetched I don't know what to believe!

MFin_Looter_Kangs

If you look at the old Beatlemania clips, how old are those screaming girls? They would wait outside the moptops hotel room for sex.

fartbubbles

Is John Lennon or are any of the other Beatles known to be "baddies"?

No.

kazza64

paul mccartney spends a lot of time on david geffens mega yacht

bopper

Lennon was severely traumatized by the death of Paul, it shaped the remainder of his life, all that it entailed. He hated the replacement.

illuminalto2

The Beatles featured satanist Aliestar Crowley as one of their "admired persons" in the background of the cover of Sgt. Peppers Lonely hearts club band album.

What does this tell us?

Lennon and McCartney also got groovy with reknown satanist pedophile and self proclaimed "fixer" Jimmy Saville (another Epstein level character, trafficking and all).

So yeah.

Lennon was also a raging heroin addict who beat his women as per different biographies about him.

Like so many, I love their music, but it hurts to know the truth.

And now a random opinion with no fact behind it, maybe the Beatles were themselves groomed? Maybe they themselves were abused and then given all the fame and fortune to reinforce the quid pro quo attitude of the twisted music industry?

Just spit balling.

2Smedleys_butler

William s. Burroughs too. Naked lunch is the most disturbing thing I've ever read, but certainly an eye opener, even though Burroughs was a talented but sick fuck

redwing14

satanism or whatever (freemason, zionism, jesuits, ect)is the elitist religion. My guess is that satanist say it is okay because they will enslave the world, and prevent them from endless crime, and give endless pleasure. In return satanist get incredible power, and a 'miniscule' amount of sacrifice. And, I suppose the accurate term is sacrifice. To sacrifice a tiny fraction for the many.

Maybe that is what genesis was representing. There was god(nwo and elite), angels(enlightened woke slaves), adam and eve(slaves), fruit of knowledge. The story is of one of the angels or enlightened slaves tried to fuck up 'paradise'. The only thing was no one is to know about the man behind the curtain, like the movie wizard of oz.

In my estimation china wants to either be a part of it, or control it themselves, jews and elite want the same. The opposition are the christians. Christians in usa have the conservative party, russia has their gov't.

cueanon2

Crowley wasn't "admired." He was depicted as another lonely heart, as in "all the lonely people, where do they all belong?"

The Beatles "got groovy" with Saville? Evidence? What does "groovy" imply or is that simply baseless innuendo?

illuminalto2

Crowley wasn't "admired." He was depicted as another lonely heart, as in "all the lonely people, where do they all belong?"

Sure. The cover also features Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, and ravenous pedophile Oscar Wilde.

Just a bunch of lonely hearts!

The Beatles "got groovy" with Saville? Evidence? What does "groovy" imply or is that simply baseless innuendo?

It was definitely innuendo.

cueanon2

The cover has over 30 people on it including Mae West, Marilyn Monroe, Laurel and Hardy, Carl Jung and Bob Dylan. You're selectively editing for purposes of innuendo.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_images_on_the_cover_of_Sgt._Pepper%27s_Lonely_Hearts_Club_Band

illuminalto2

I'm not selectively editing shit.

I'm factually listing people who were on the cover of Sgt. Pepper's album.

You refuse to weed out the turds in your garden salad and insist that it still tastes good to you.

That's fine. Eat up.

cueanon2

You were trying to imply that everyone on the cover had some kind of connection to pedophilia, which is false. In fact very few of them do.

binrobinro

I didn't see that implied anywhere.

illuminalto2

imply that everyone on the cover had some kind of connection to pedophilia

I never said that EVERYONE on the cover has some kind of connection to pedophilia. Nor did I ever imply it.

I simply pointed out the low hanging fruit.

which is false. In fact very few of them do.

VERY INTERESTING that you persist to defend the beatles, when you openly admit that you KNOW that some of the people on the cover of that album ARE connected to pedophilia.

Very. Interesting.

cueanon2

That's interesting? In what way?

illuminalto2

Interesting to hear you spin your point.

You just admitted that the album cover has more than one pedophile featured on the front.

After twisting my words to try and make me incorrect.

And even though you admit there are pedophiles (and satanists) on the cover of the album, you still persist that it's not a big deal and there could have possibly been no ill intentions behind it.

cueanon2

You mistakenly persist in thinking the cover's purpose is for admiration of the people on it, when it's a depiction of the "lonely hearts club band", a bunch of lonely celebrities with issues who happened to be famous.

Vindicator

Yes, I'd say they are baddies. Here's every submission we have mentioning either "Beatles", "McCartney" or "Lennon": https://searchvoat.co/?t=Beatles+%7C+McCartney+%7C+Lennon&s=Pizzagate&b=on&nsfw=on

illuminalto2

Yeah this times 1,000.

The fuck man.

It's fucked when you know.

cueanon2

"Yeah this times 1,000. It's fucked when you know." Um, care to back that up with evidence or u just pissing into the wind?

illuminalto2

Let's see, cover art depicting dismemberd baby dolls and pizza?

Kind of hard to miss the symbology after PizzaGate revelation.

fartbubbles

cover art depicting dismemberd baby dolls and pizza?

There's no pizza on that album cover. Take the confirmation bias glasses off and have an objective look. It's butchered meat, not pizza.

illuminalto2

Part of album grain, Im having a hard time not seeing the brown/white bits as cooked pizza.

I thought raw meat intially but then two triangle pie shapes seemed to pop out at me, one of john's lap and one on ringo's and I thought pizza.

But I also was trying to figure out what cuts of meat it was, or if some set lurch was made to just go hack at a slab for stage props.

What kind of meat are we looking at here?

cueanon2

You're ignoring the context in which the cover was shot. "Although the photo was intended to be part of a larger work critiquing the adulation afforded the Beatles, the band members insisted it was a statement against the Vietnam War. Others interpreted it as the Beatles protesting the record company's policy of "butchering" their albums for the North American market. In response to outrage from record retailers, the LP was withdrawn and the cover replaced with a shot of the band posed around a steam trunk."

illuminalto2

Right, but in looking up the purpose for the cover's creating, you can find numerous stories and "interpretations".

What is the interpretation of putting more than one pedophile on the cover of your band's album art?

That they were just lonely hearts?

Give me a break.

cueanon2

You're stretching so far you're in danger of snapping like a rubber band.

illuminalto2

I haven't stretched anything.

I'm still standing on my original point that I made at the top.

There are satanists and pedophiles on the cover of Sgt. Pepper album.

You know they are there, think it's cool, and are willing to defend it.

cueanon2

You're either a moron or a shill, likely both, as the significance of the cover is not in any way connected with endorsing pedophilia.

illuminalto2

"Just because I keep the company of pedophiles, doesn't mean I'm a pedophile"

Saville toured with the beatles, he booked them when they were nobody, he helped them break into the music business. He remained friends with them for a long, long time.

Saville was a prolific pedophile and child trafficker.

If you can ignore this fact, then I guess the pedophiles on the cover of the album were just coincidentally placed there because people like Aleistar Crowley were actually famous celebrities who had unfortunate accidents in their lives.

People like Karl Marx, whose communist musings led to the death of 25 million or more in Communist Russia during WW1 are actually just famous celebrities.

Jesus man.

cueanon2

Dude, you're going to have to back up your rant with some evidence. "Saville toured with the beatles, he booked them when they were nobody, he helped them break into the music business. He remained friends with them for a long, long time." Show me the evidence. I'm calling your bluff.

And even if you could do that, which you can't, you'd have to show evidence that John, Paul, George or Ringo advocated for pedophilia at any time in their lives.

rayfarmer

They all are. All of them. You don’t get to that fame without being one of them.

cueanon2

Except that a few of them do, but not a lot.

cueanon2

Very over generalized statement, basically meaningless.

theHare

I fucking hate the Beatles and I absolutely love good music.

volunteerwork2020

All programming music for MK Ultra like that gay Yellow Submarine one.

cueanon2

"good music"? Like what, Green Day? LOL

theHare

Lol, nice one. Green Day is probably shittier than the Beatles for sure. Both suck major gay dicks, fact.

cueanon2

No more than you, though, for sure.

theHare

Noice one mate!

cueanon2

Hey Hare, I'm not even a fan of the Beatles, but they wrote songs, sold millions of records, toured the world and became millionaires. What'd you do?

theHare

Not be a faggot?

cueanon2

What's with the question mark? There seems to be some doubt.

3141592653

Cuz of that photo???

puggy

The photo shows what a cuck he was. He was a creep because he was a horrible father to his sons and first wife. He was a typical limousine liberal Marxist who wrote songs about having no possessions while living like a king. He was so brain addled by time he died that he actually thought Yoko was a talented musician and artist. His solo work is horrible and unlistenable. He was a male feminist who actually wrote a song titled "Woman is the Nigger of the World". I could go on.

redwing14

there are only 2 systems. The people govern themselves (no or small government) or the elite govern the brainless slaves.

Truthseeker3000

THIS!!!!! Yes excellent comment, nailed it.

carmencita

Young actress - Sue Lyon.

Chuckstumor

He described seeing an Elvis movie and seeing all the young girls screaming for the singer made him want that job. All his famous love affairs were with women though. He probably knew some dark and shady people and he did a lot of drugs but I've never heard of any links to adrenochrome. He spent a few years in the early 70s partying hard in LA which is a demon possessed town. I don't think he would have abused kids but a sexualized young girl offering herself to a rockstar seems like something he might have done while drunk or high with the world at his feet. He was no saint but I'm not convinced he was hopelessly evil